Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Flow-velocity-dependent effects of turbid water on periphyton structure and function in flowing water

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Aquatic Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Land-use change, human activities, and dam management supply highly turbid water with high flow velocity; however, little is known about its effect on river ecosystems. Here, we studied the effects of flow velocity and suspended silt concentration on periphyton structure and function using experimental channels. The effects of flow velocity on algal biomass in the periphyton community depended on the suspended silt concentration; flow velocity decreased chlorophyll a in low concentrations of suspended silt (clear water), but not in moderate or high concentrations (turbid water). Filamentous cyanobacteria density was significantly influenced by flow velocity, whereas densities of non-filamentous cyanobacteria, green algae, and diatoms were not. Thus, flushing effects on attached algae, especially filamentous cyanobacteria, were exerted in clear but not in turbid waters, perhaps because algal assemblages were resistant to water current through the binding of large amounts of silt by extracellular polymeric substances. Inorganic matter and its ratio in the periphyton community decreased with flow velocity, but increased with suspended silt concentration, irrespective of flow velocity. Periphyton function, assessed by maximum photosynthesis rates and light-use efficiency, was influenced by flow velocity and suspended silt concentration through changes in periphyton structure. Flood events would be expected to refresh the periphyton community by removing senescent algae and deposited fine particles. However, we demonstrated that algae and silt in the periphyton community exposed to turbid waters with human-induced silt may accumulate, irrespective of flow velocity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe T, Sasaki S, Aizawa S, Hashimoto T, Yamanoi K (2014) Inflow of sediment from thinning zone to a stream through strip roads. Hoppou Shinrin Kenkyu 62:91–94 (Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthington A (2012) Environmental flows: saving rivers in the third millennium. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Asaeda TM, Rashid H (2012) The impacts of sediment released from dams on downstream sediment bar vegetation. J Hydrol 430–431:25–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates DM, Chambers JM (1992) Nonlinear models. In: Chambers JM, Hastie TJ (eds) Statistical models in S. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, pp 421–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Battin TJ, Kaplan LA, Newbold JD, Hansen CME (2003) Contributions of microbial biofilms to ecosystem processes in stream mesocosms. Nature 426:439–442

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beaulieu JJ, Arango CP, Balz DA, Shuster WD (2013) Continuous monitoring reveals multiple controls on ecosystem metabolism in a suburban stream. Freshw Biol 58:918–937

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beschta RL, Jackson WL (1979) The intrusion of fine sediments into a stable gravel bed. J Fish Res Board Can 36:204–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs BJF, Thomsen HA (1995) Disturbance of stream periphyton by perturbations in shear stress: time to structural failure and differences in community resistance. J Phycol 31:233–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Branco CCZ, Júnior ON, Peres CK (2010) Effects of artificial substratum types and exposure time on macroalgal colonization in a tropical stream. Fund Appl Limnol 178:17–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso-Leite R, Guillermo-Ferreira R, Novaes MC, Fajar Tonetto A (2015) Microhabitat hydraulics predict algae growth in running systems. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 15:49–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline LD, Short RA, Ward JV (1982) The influence of highway construction on the macroinvertebrates and epilithic algae of a high mountain stream. Hydrobiologia 96:149–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Dade WB, Friend PF (1998) Grain-size, sediment-transport regime, and channel slope in alluvial rivers. J Geol 106:661–675

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies–Colley RJ, Hickey CW, Quinn JM, Ryan PA (1992) Effects of clay discharges on streams. 1. Optical-properties and epilithon. Hydrobiologia 248:215–234

    Google Scholar 

  • De Brouwer JFC, Wolfstein K, Ruddy GK, Jones TER, Stal LJ (2005) Biogenic stabilization of intertidal sediments: the importance of extracellular polymeric substances produced by benthic diatoms. Microb Ecol 49:501–512

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds WK, Brock J (1998) A portable flow chamber for in situ determination of benthic metabolism. Freshw Biol 39:49–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Eloranta P, Kunnas S (1979) The growth and species communities of the attached algae in a river system in central Finland. Arch Hydrobiol 86:27–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flinders CA, Hart DD (2009) Effects of pulsed flows on nuisance periphyton growths in rivers: a mesocosm study. River Res Appl 25:1320–1330

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An R companion to applied regression, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Francoeur SN, Biggs BJF (2006) Short-term effects of elevated velocity and sediment abrasion on benthic algal communities. Hydrobiologia 561:59–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbersdorf SU, Jancke T, Westrich B, Paterson DM (2008) Microbial stabilization of riverine sediments by extracellular polymeric substances. Geobiology 6:57–69

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon ND, McMahon TA, Finlayson BL, Gippel CJ, Nathan RJ (2004) Stream Hydrology: an introduction for ecologists, 2nd edn. Wiley, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Graba M, Sauvage S, Moulin FY, Urrea G, Sabater S, Sanchez-Perez JM (2013) Interaction between local hydrodynamics and algal community in epilithic biofilm. Water Res 47:2153–2163

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham AA (1990) Siltation of stone-surface periphyton in rivers by clay-sized particles from low concentrations in suspension. Hydrobiologia 199:107–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall RO, Thomas S, Gaiser EE (2007) Measuring freshwater primary production and respiration. In: Fahey TJ, Knapp AK (eds) Principles and standards for measuring primary production. Oxford University, New York, pp 175–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauer FR, Lamberti GA (2006) Methods in stream ecology, 2nd edn. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill WR, Boston HL (1991) Community-development alters photosynthesis–irradiance relations in stream periphyton. Limnol Oceanogr 36:1375–1389

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horner RR, Welch EB, Seeley MR, Jacoby JM (1990) Responses of periphyton to changes in current velocity, suspended sediment and phosphorus concentration. Freshw Biol 24:215–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes HBN (1970) The ecology of running waters. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool

    Google Scholar 

  • Jassby AD, Platt T (1976) Mathematical formulation of relationship between photosynthesis and light for phytoplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 21:540–547

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jowett IG, Biggs BJF (1997) Flood and velocity effects on periphyton and silt accumulation in two New Zealand rivers. New Zeal J Mar Fresh 31:287–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Koizumi I, Kanazawa Y, Tanaka Y (2013) The fishermen were right: experimental evidence for tributary refuge hypothesis during floods. Zoolog Sci 30:375–379

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kondolf GM, Gao Y, Annandale GW, Morris GL, Jiang E, Zhang J, Cao Y, Carling P, Fu K, Guo Q, Hotchkiss R, Peteuil C, Sumi T, Wang H-W, Wang Z, Wei Z, Wu B, Wu C, Yang CT (2014) Sustainable sediment management in reservoirs and regulated rivers: experiences from five continents. Earth’s Future 2:256–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurashige Y, Ikejiri K, Suzuki S, Hirakawa K (2005) Sandy sediment supply due to intensive cultivation in the Toberi River basin, Hokkaido, Japan. Trans Jpn Geomorphol Union 26:131–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb MP, Finnegan NJ, Scheingross JS, Sklar LS (2015) New insights into the mechanics of fluvial bedrock erosion through flume experiments and theory. Geomorphology 244:33–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Minami S, Otsuki H, Liu BY, Ashida K (2004) Prediction of concerted sediment flushing. J Hydraul Eng-ASCE 130:1089–1096

    Google Scholar 

  • Losee RF, Wetzel RG (1993) Littoral flow rates within and around submersed macrophyte communities. Freshw Biol 29:7–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce JJ, Lapointe MF, Roy AG, Ketterling DB (2013) The effects of sand abrasion of a predominantly stable stream bed on periphyton biomass losses. Ecohydrology 6:689–699

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick PV, Stevenson RJ (1991) Mechanisms of benthic algal succession in lotic environments. Ecology 72:1835–1848

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake Y, Akiyama T (2012) Impacts of water storage dams on substrate characteristics and stream invertebrate assemblages. J Hydro Environ Res 6:137–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Mochizuki S, Kayaba Y, Tanida K (2006) Drift patterns of particulate matter and organisms during artificial high flows in a large experimental channel. Limnology 7:93–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori T, Saitoh T (2014) Flood disturbance and predator-prey effects on regional gradients in species diversity. Ecology 95:132–141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris GL, Fan J (1998) Reservoir sedimentation handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakano S, Takeshita A, Ohtsuka T, Nakai D (2006) Vertical profiles of current velocity and dissolved oxygen saturation in biofilms on artificial and natural substrates. Limnology 7:213–218

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson C, Reidy CA, Dynesius M, Revenga C (2005) Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science 308:405–408

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oeurng C, Sauvage S, Coynel A, Maneux E, Etcheber H, Sanchez-Perez J-M (2011) Fluvial transport of suspended sediment and organic carbon during flood events in a large agricultural catchment in southwest France. Hydrol Process 25:2365–2378

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peeters ETHM., Brugmans BTMJ., Beijer JAJ, Franken RJM (2006) Effect of silt, water and periphyton quality on survival and growth of the mayfly Heptagenia sulphurea. Aquat Ecol 40:373–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Schälchli U (1992) The clogging of coarse gravel river beds by fine sediment. Hydrobiologia 235:189–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneck F, Melo AS (2012) Hydrological disturbance overrides the effect of substratum roughness on the resistance and resilience of stream benthic algae. Freshw Biol 57:1678–1688

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvester NR, Sleigh MA (1985) The forces on microorganisms at surfaces in flowing water. Freshw Biol 15:433–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinman AD, Mcintire CD (1990) Recovery of lotic periphyton communities after disturbance. Environ Manage 14:589–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson RJ (1990) Benthic algal community dynamics in a stream during and after a spate. J N Am Benthol Soc 9:277–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson J (2014) Ecological assessments with algae: a review and synthesis. J Phycol 50:437–461

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL (1996) Algal ecology. Academic, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudo M, Miki T, Masuda Y (2009) Research on characteristics of turbid water effluent from paddy fields during the paddling and the transplanting period. Trans JSIDRE 260:7–13 (Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Takao A, Kawaguchi Y, Minagawa T, Kayaba Y, Morimoto Y (2008) The relationships between benthic macroinvertebrates and biotic and abiotic environmental characteristics downstream of the Yahagi dam, central Japan, and the state change caused by inflow from a tributary. River Res Appl 24:580–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamooh F, Meysman FJR, Borges AV, Marwick TR, Van den Meersche K, Dehairs F, Merckx R, Bouillon S (2014) Sediment and carbon fluxes along a longitudinal gradient in the lower Tana River (Kenya). J Geophys Res-Biogeo 119:1340–1353

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanida K, Mitsuhashi H, Fujitani T (1999) A simple acrylate fiber sampler for stream periphyton. Jpn J Limnol 60:619–624 (Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiğrek Ş, Aras T (2011) Reservoir sediment management. CRC, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonetto AF, Cardoso-Leite R, Novaes MC, Guillermo-Ferreira R (2014) The relationship between macroalgal morphological complexity and hydraulic conditions in stream habitats. Hydrobiologia 747:33–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Van De Koppel J, Herman PMJ, Thoolen P, Heip CHR (2001) Do alternate stable states occur in natural ecosystems? evidence from a tidal flat. Ecology 82:3449–3461

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters TF (1995) Sediments in streams: sources, biological effects, and control. AFS Monographs, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellnitz T, Rader RB (2003) Mechanisms influencing community composition and succession in mountain stream periphyton: interactions between scouring history, grazing, and irradiance. J N Am Benthol Soc 22:528–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood PJ, Armitage PD (1997) Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Environ Manage 21:203–217

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada H, Nakamura F (2002) Effect of fine sediment deposition and channel works on periphyton biomass in the Makomanai River, northern Japan. River Res Appl 18:481–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Y, Giordano M, Gao K (2015) Photochemical responses of the diatom Skeletonema costatum grown under elevated CO2 concentrations to short-term changes in pH. Aquat Biol 23:109–118

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Yasumitsu Kato, Yuki Fukuda, Masaki Ozaki, Takao Aikawa, and Manabu Kume for their help in the field and with the laboratory experiments. We thank the staff of the ARRC for their logistical support. This study was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24710039, 14J09569).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Aqua Restoration Research Centre, Public Works Research Institute, Kawashima Kasada-machi, Kakamigahara, 501-6021, Japan

    Terutaka Mori, Yukio Miyagawa, Yukio Onoda & Yuichi Kayaba

  2. Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Meguro, Tokyo, 153-8902, Japan

    Terutaka Mori

Authors
  1. Terutaka Mori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yukio Miyagawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yukio Onoda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuichi Kayaba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terutaka Mori.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 38 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 53 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mori, T., Miyagawa, Y., Onoda, Y. et al. Flow-velocity-dependent effects of turbid water on periphyton structure and function in flowing water. Aquat Sci 80, 6 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-017-0552-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-017-0552-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation