Abstract
Activities of the retinoic acid receptor (RAR)α and RARγ are important to hematopoiesis. Here, we have investigated the effects of receptor selective agonists and antagonists on the primitive human hematopoietic cell lines KG1 and NB-4 and purified normal human hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Agonizing RARα (by AGN195183) was effective in driving neutrophil differentiation of NB-4 cells and this agonist synergized with a low amount (10 nM) of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 to drive monocyte differentiation of NB-4 and KG1 cells. Treatment of cultures of human HSCs (supplemented with stem cell factor ± interleukin 3) with an antagonist of all RARs (AGN194310) or of RARα (AGN196996) prolonged the lifespan of cultures, up to 55 days, and increased the production of neutrophils and monocytes. Slowing down of cell differentiation was not observed, and instead, hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells had expanded in number. Antagonism of RARγ (by AGN205728) did not affect cultures of HSCs. Studies of CV-1 and LNCaP cells transfected with RAR expression vectors and a reporter vector revealed that RARγ and RARβ are activated by sub-nM all-trans retinoic acid (EC50–0.3 nM): ~50-fold more is required for activation of RARα (EC50–16 nM). These findings further support the notion that the balance of expression and activity of RARα and RARγ are important to hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell expansion and differentiation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Retinoic acid receptors (RARs) are members of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, and there are three main isoforms of RAR in vertebrates: RARα, β, and γ (Chambon 1996; Sucov and Evans 1995). RARs form heterodimers with retinoid X receptors which bind to retinoic acid response elements (RAREs) in the promoter/enhancer regions of target genes to either activate or repress gene transcription (Kastner et al. 1997). Activation versus repression of transcription by RARs is affected by binding or otherwise of the natural ligand all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) which influences the recruitment of either corepressors or coactivators of transcription (Niederreither and Dollé 2008). In the absence of ATRA, RARα binds the silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptor/nuclear receptor corepressor family of corepressors resulting in the formation of a histone deacetylase repressor complex at RAREs and repression of transcription. Binding of ATRA to RARα leads to the release of corepressors, recruitment of coactivators, and gene transcription. In contrast to RARα, β and γ have been reported to activate gene transcription without having bound ligand, and in this case, binding of ATRA serves to increase activation (Farboud et al. 2003; Hauksdottir et al. 2003).
RARs are important regulators of vertebrate development as to cells making fate decisions and then undergoing differentiation (reviewed in Mendoza-Parra and Gronemeyer 2013). Expression of the different isoforms varies temporally during development and, in regard to cell type, pointing to the isoforms having different functions rather than functional redundancy (Dollé et al. 1990; Germain et al. 2006; Kastner et al. 1995). Findings from RAR-knockout mice emphasize the importance of RARs to development. Ocular defects and reduced body weight are seen in RARβ-knockout mice, RARβ-knockout mice have severe defects, and knockout of two or more receptors is generally lethal (Ghyselinck et al. 1997; Li et al. 1993; Lohnes et al. 1993; Subbarayan et al. 1997). There are not obvious defects in the RARα-knockout mouse, and in humans, abnormality in regard to expression/function of this isoform is associated with malignancy. In acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), chromosome translocations lead to chimeric RARα proteins that result in a block in myeloid cell differentiation at the promyelocyte stage (reviewed in Ablain and de Thé 2014). As to other isoforms and malignancy, RARγ is reported to be an oncogene in hepatocellular carcinoma (Yan et al. 2010).
RARα and RARγ are important regulators of the differentiation of hematopoietic cells. Agonizing RARα, using ATRA or a selective agonist, promotes the differentiation of normal myeloid progenitor cells (Gratas et al. 1993) and promyeloid cell lines, such as HL60 cells, which respond by differentiating towards neutrophils (Breitman et al. 1980). ATRA may also be involved in specifying a granulocyte fate, as this agent appears to orient pluripotent hematopoietic progenitors towards the granulocyte lineage (Tocci et al. 1996). In keeping with these roles for RARα, the RAR fusion proteins that arrest myeloid differentiation of APL cells function as dominant-negative inhibitors of wild-type RARα (reviewed in Tsai and Collins 1993; Yan et al. 2010). A shift provoked by the fusion proteins to attract a novel repertoire of corepressors has been proposed to contribute to this action (Mengeling et al. 2011). Though ATRA clearly promotes neutrophil differentiation, the influence of RARα is modulatory: RARα is dispensable as evidenced by RARα−/− mice which make neutrophils. Kastner concluded that RARα modulates granulopoiesis in a bi-directional manner, with ligand-bound receptor promoting differentiation and ligand-free receptor inhibiting it (Kastner et al. 2001).
Agonizing RARγ appears to oppose the ligand-driven action of RARα by interfering with the capacity of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) to undergo differentiation and promoting self-renewal and/or proliferation. A reduced number of HSCs in the γ-knockout mouse highlight the importance of RARγ to hematopoiesis, and loss of RARγ also abrogated the capacity of ATRA to potentiate the maintenance of HSC in culture. Purton et al. (2006) concluded that RARγ plays a critical role in regulating whether HSC self-renew and maintain their pluripotency versus embark on differentiation. Like RARα, the role of RARγ is modulatory, as HSCs are still present in the knockout mouse. That RARγ has a role in allowing cells to maintain pluripotency, is further supported by the finding that addition of RARγ to the Yamanaka cocktail of transcription factors used to generate induced pluripotent stem cells from somatic cells improves the efficiency, by which these cells can be generated (Wang et al. 2011).
Here, we utilized agonists and antagonists of RARs that are highly selective for RAR receptor isoforms to examine further the influence of RARα and RARγ on the growth and differentiation of promyeloid cell lines and normal human HSCs. In regard to the reported constitutive activity of RARγ, we examine whether transactivation of RARα and RARγ is differentially regulated by ATRA as to concentration dependence.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and Antibodies
1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25D) was obtained from Cayman Europe (Tallinn, Estonia), while ATRA and TTNPB were from Sigma (St Louis, MO, USA). The compounds were dissolved in absolute ethanol at a concentration of 10 µM and stored at −20 °C. The synthetic retinoids AGN195183, AGN194310, AGN196996, and AGN205728 were synthesized at the Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica. Their synthesis, development, and specificities have been described previously (Hughes et al. 2006; Johnson et al. 1995; Klein et al. 1996; Nagpal et al. 1995; Nagpal and Chandraratna 1996, 2000; Teng et al. 1996). Retinoids were dissolved in 50 % methanol/50 % dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) at a concentration of 10 mM (stored at −20 °C), and this stock was diluted using culture medium to the required concentration. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies to RARα (sc-550), RARβ (sc-552), and to actin (sc-1616), and a mouse monoclonal antibody to HDAC1 (sc-7872) were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.
Cell Lines
NB-4 and KG1 cells were obtained from the German Resource Center for Biological Material (DSMZ GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany). The cells were grown in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA). Cells were grown at 37 °C in 5 % CO2. Cell differentiation of NB-4 and KG1 cells was induced by incubating with 10 nM 1,25D ± 1 µM ATRA or 100 nM retinoids for 96 h.
Primary Cultures of Human CD34+ve Cells
The cells used were CD34+ve cells purified from the blood of normal human adult donors and post-mobilization of stem cells to the blood. Cells obtained and purified in this manner are used routinely by the National Blood Service Stem Cell Laboratory in Birmingham for bone marrow transplantation. Ethics approval for the use of adult human blood-mobilized stem cells (CD34+vehuHSC) was from the West Midlands Research Ethics Committee. Informed consent was obtained by the regional National Blood Service Stem Cell Laboratory in Birmingham. CD34+ve cells were purified to 99 % CD34+ve, 97 % CD133+ve, >99 % lineage−ve (n = 15) using an anti-CD34 monoclonal antibody, immunomagnetic beads, and a CliniMACS magnetic separator. Purified cells were plated at 5 × 105 cells/ml in microtiter wells in 200 μl of either RPMI-1640 medium (R and D Systems, Abingdon, UK) or HPGMTM hematopoietic growth medium (Lonza, UK) containing either 10 % FBS or 10 % human serum, antibiotics (100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin) and stem cell factor (SCF), interleukin (IL)-3, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) (all from R and D Systems Abingdon, UK) as stated in the results. Cultures were fed every 2–3 days (with fresh compound), split into microtiter wells, and then expanded into 2 ml Costar wells to maintain a cell density of between 2.5 and 10 × 105 cells/ml. Cells were grown at 37 °C in 5 % CO2. Viable cells were enumerated by phase contrast microscopy (400× magnification).
Assays for Progenitor Cells
Assays for week-five cobblestone area forming cells (CAFC), long-term culture-initiating cells (LTC-IC), and colony-forming units (CFU) were performed at the Stem Cell Laboratory at the National Blood Service Stem Cell Laboratory using standard procedures and methods, as described by other workers (de Wynter and Ploemacher 2001; Denning-Kendall et al. 1996; Nicol et al. 1996). CFU assays were performed using MethocultTM GF H8444 (StemCell Technologies) and in 35 mm petri dishes. The presence of CAFC was scored as the presence of 12 or more closely associated and small cells that were embedded in the MS5 cell feeder layer and blind by an experienced reader. The nature of CFUs, as to colony-forming unit-granulocyte/erythroid/megakaryocyte/monocyte (CFU-GEMM), colony-forming unit-granulocyte/macrophage (CFU-GM), burst-forming unit-erythroid (BFU-E), and colony-forming unit-erythroid (CFU-E), was scored blind at the service by a person who routinely reads colony assays and is accredited. The nature of colonies was confirmed by sampling colonies and staining cytocentrifuged preparations of cells.
Assessment of Cell Differentiation
The expression of differentiation markers at the cell surface was determined by flow cytometry. Differentiation of NB-4 and KG1 cells was measured by staining using the monoclonal antibodies CD11b-FITC and CD14-PE and appropriately labeled isotype controls (all from ImmunoTools, Friesoythe, Germany). Differentiation of human CD34+ve cells was measured by triple-color staining using various cocktails of phycoerythrin-, fluorescein isothyocyanate-, and PerCP-monoclonal antibodies (from Becton–Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). The markers used to identify cell populations were as follows: CD45+ve leukocytes; CD34+ve/CD133+ve HSCs; CD33+ve/CD13+ve immature myeloid; CD117+ve myeloblasts and promyelocytes; CD11b+ve/CD15+ve mature myeloid; CD11b+ve/CD65+ve neutrophils; CD11b+ve/CD14+ve monocytes; glycophorin+ve A erythroid cells; CD61+ve megakaryoblasts and platelets; CD2+ve/CD5+ve/CD7+ve T cells and NK cells; CD56+ve NK cells; CD19+ve/CD20+ve B cells; and CD10+ve B lymphocyte progenitors; and present on mature neutrophils and DR+ve progenitors and present on mature monocytes. The cells were stained with 1 µl of the fluorescently labeled antibody (or the appropriate control immunoglobulin) for 1 h on ice. Next, they were washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and suspended in 0.5 ml PBS supplemented with 0.1 % bovine serum albumin (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) prior to analysis on FACS Calibur flow cytometer (Becton–Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). The acquisition parameters were set for an isotype control. Cells were analyzed using a FACSCalibur, and data analysis was performed using the CellQuest Pro software (Becton–Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA).
Measurement of mRNA and Protein Levels for RARs
Isolation of total RNA, reverse transcription into cDNA, and real-time PCR reactions were performed as described previously (Gocek et al. 2012), using the CFX Real-time PCR System (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., CA, USA). The RARA, RARB, and RARG primers were obtained from RealTimePrimers.com (Real Time Primers, LLC, PA, USA), and GAPDH primers were as published (Baurska et al. 2011). Quantification of gene expression was analyzed with the ΔΔCq method using GAPDH as the endogenous control. Primer efficiencies were measured in all cell lines using a real-time PCR reaction based on the slope of the standard curve. The results were normalized to primer efficiencies to compare gene expression in different cell lines. Real-time PCR assays were performed at least in triplicate.
Western Blotting
The cytosolic and nuclear lysates were obtained using NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Worcester, MA, USA) according to the user’s manual. 6 × 106 cells per sample were washed with PBS and lysed in 200 μl of cytoplasmic extraction buffer, and centrifuged, and the remaining pellets were lysed in 100 μl of nuclear extraction buffer. The buffers contained a cocktail of protease inhibitors (BioTools, Inc., Jupiter, FL, USA). The lysates obtained were denatured by adding five times sample buffer and boiling for 5 min. For Western blotting, 25 μl of each lysate were separated on 10 % SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were then dried, and incubated sequentially with primary antibody (3 h) and a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1 h) at room temperature. The protein bands were visualized by chemiluminescence (Santa Cruz).
Retinoid Receptor Transactivation Assays
For transactivation studies, we used CV-1 kidney fibroblast cells and LNCaP prostate adenocarcinoma cells that can be readily and reproducibly transfected with plasmids and reporters. Transactivation assays using CV-1 cells were undertaken essentially as described previously (Nagpal et al. 1995). Briefly, CV-1 cells were transiently transfected with a plasmid-containing ERE-tk-Luc promoter-reporter construct using Lipofectamine as described in the manufacturer’s protocol (Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK). ERE-tk-Luc transcript comprises a luciferase reporter under control of an estrogen receptor response element. The cells were also transiently transfected with expression vector encoding a fusion protein containing the ligand-binding domain of RARα, RARβ, or RARγ fused to an estrogen receptor DNA-binding domain. Twenty-four hours after transfection, the cells were treated with retinoids under test for 16 h in culture medium-containing 2.5 % charcoal-treated FBS and lysed for determination of luciferase and β-galactosidase activities. Luciferase activity was measured using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter 100 Assay System (Promega, Southampton, UK), and β-galactosidase activity was determined by colorimetric assay. The reporter activity was normalized against β-galactosidase activity. The transactivation data are presented as the percentage ± SEM of the maximal response produced by 1 μM ATRA. The prostate adenocarcinoma cell line LNCaP was transiently transfected with a pSG5-RARα1 or pSG5-RARγ1 mammalian expression vector together with a pT109-DRG5-luc luciferase reporter under the control of a DR5G RARE (constructed by Dr. Kevin Petrie and Arthur Zelent, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK). Cells were transfected using Lipofectamine according to the manufacturer’s instructions and treated and assayed as above.
Statistical Analyses
All assays were performed in triplicate. Results were statistically analyzed by a one-way ANOVA and Student’s t test to determine the significance of differences in values obtained from control and treated groups using the Sigmastat™ software package (Systat Software Inc. London). Difference in statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Concentration response curves were fitted to the Hill equation and ED50s estimated using the SigmaPlot™ software package (version 10 containing the “pharmacology” module, Systat Software Inc. London).
Results
Pharmacological Properties of the Synthetic RAR Isoform-Specific Retinoids
The RAR-selective compounds are highly specific agonists and antagonists as reported elsewhere (Hammond et al. 2002; Hughes et al. 2006; Nagpal et al. 1995). The agonists stimulate transactivation in CV-1 cells transfected with an appropriate RAR expression vector and reporter construct. The antagonists failed to do so for RAR transfected CV-1 cells, and instead, blocked ATRA- and TTNPB-stimulated RAR transactivation in a dose responsive fashion. The binding affinities of compounds at individual isoforms of RAR and RXR are shown in Table 1. The receptor selective α agonist AGN195183 binds with a high affinity to RARα (ED50 20.1 nM). The pan-antagonist AGN194310 and receptor selective α antagonist AGN196996 and γ antagonist AGN205728 bind with high affinities to all RARs (ED50 4.3, 5, and 2 nM), RARα (ED50 3.9 nM), and RARγ (ED50 3 nM), respectively.
Agonizing RARα Drives Differentiation of NB-4 and KG1 Cells
The human promyeloid cell line HL60 differentiates towards neutrophils in response to ATRA (Breitman et al. 1980). Previously, we used agonists and antagonists of RAR isoforms and retinoid X receptor and a HL60 sub-line that expresses a dominant-negative RARα to show that ATRA-provoked differentiation of HL60 cells requires activation of RARα which forms heterodimers with retinoid X receptor (Hughes et al. 2006).
The NB-4 cell line harbors one copy of the wild-type RARA gene and one copy of the PML-RARA fusion gene, which encodes the fusion protein PML-RARα (Lanotte et al. 1991). KG1 cells express the fusion gene FGFR1OP2-FGFR1 encoding the fusion protein FOP2-FGFR1 which activates the STAT signaling pathways (Gu et al. 2006). The expression levels of RARA, RARB, and RARG genes in these cells were measured, relative to GAPDH expression levels, using Real-time PCR. Figure 1a shows that both cell lines express high levels of RARB, moderate levels of RARA, while RARG mRNA is almost undetectable. The presence of respective proteins in cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions of lysates, prepared from equal numbers of NB-4 and KG1 cells, was investigated by Western blotting (Fig. 1b). Comparison of Fig. 1a and b reveals that the levels of protein and mRNAs do not match. The RARα isoform was readily detected in lysates and the antibodies against RARβ and RARγ did not give a detectable signal. RARα was detected only in lysates of the nuclei of both cell lines with KG1 cells expressing RARα at a higher level than NB-4 cells, when normalized to the level of histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1), which also confirmed the purity of nuclear lysates.
Figure 1c shows that NB-4 cells differentiated towards monocytes (CD11b+ve/CD14+ve) to a small extent when treated with a high dose (1 μM) of ATRA (~10 % CD11b+ve/CD14+ve cells) and a low dose (10 nM) of 1,25D (~6 % CD11b+ve/CD14+ve cells). The combined use of 10 nM 1,25D and 1 μM ATRA increased the level of monocyte differentiation to ~36 %. Figure 1c shows that 100 nM of the α agonist AGN195183 effectively induced neutrophil differentiation of NB-4 cells to a level of 40 % CD11b+ve/CD14−ve cells. AGN195183 was also more effective than ATRA when used in combination with 10 nM 1,25D to induce monocyte differentiation. 100 nM of AGN195183 was sufficient, as compared with 1 μM ATRA, to give rise to 40 % CD11b+ve/CD14+ve cells. Pan, α, and γ antagonists had no effect on NB-4 cells when used alone, and the antagonists did not have an appreciable effect when used with 10 nM 1,25D as compared with the use of 1,25D alone.
Figure 1d shows that treatment of KG1 cells with ATRA and the α agonist AGN195183 led to a low level of neutrophil differentiation of between 5 and 10 % CD11b+ve/CD14−ve cells. Both ATRA and AGN195183 when used in combination with 10 nM 1,25D resulted in a significant level of differentiation towards monocytes. Percentages of CD11b+ve/CD14+ve cells were 26 and 18 %, respectively. Again, the α agonist was observed to be more potent than ATRA, as this agent was used at 100 nM compared to 1 μM ATRA. The pan, α, and γ antagonists had no effect on KG1 cells when used alone and together with 1,25D. Representative histograms which show the levels of differentiation induced by the α agonist, 1,25D or both agents are presented in Fig. 1e for NB-4 cells and in Fig. 1f for KG1 cells.
Antagonism of RARs Increases the Production of Myeloid Cells by CD34+vehuHSC-Initiated Cultures
The phenotype of the CD34 column purified cells as to surface markers associated with hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells was 95.3 ± 1.7 CD133+ve, 98.1 ± 0.6 CD34+ve, 84.7 ± 4.7 CD117+ve, 90.1 ± 3.0 CD38+ve, and 91.1 ± 3.0 HLA-DR+ve (n = 15 donors). The levels of contamination by myeloid- (CD14, CD15, CD11b and CD64), erythroid- (glycophorin A), T-cell- (CD3, CD5, CD7, CD8 and CD27), and B-cell lineage- (CD19) associated cells were 0.9 ± 0.1, 0.8 ± 0.1, 1.0 ± 0.1, and 1.6 ± 0.5, respectively.
CD34+vehuHSC spontaneously and progressively mature giving rise largely to mature myeloid cells when cultured in a various growth media, sources of serum, and often SCF and IL-3. As such, CD34+veHSC cannot be reliably expanded in culture. To obtain differentiating myeloid cells from CD34+vehuHSC in numbers sufficient for biochemical studies, we have routinely cultured these cells in a low amount of human recombinant IL-3 ± G-CSF (Mountford et al. 1994). From past studies 10 % FBS, 100 ng/ml SCF, 5 ng/ml IL-3, and 30 ng/ml G-CSF give the best yield of mature myeloid cells from CD34+vehuHSC. We used these conditions as a benchmark to the optimal generation of myeloid cells.
Control cultures (FBS, SCF, and IL-3) of CD34+veHSC and cultures supplemented with either the pan-RAR antagonist AGN194310 or G-CSF progressively differentiated giving rise mostly to neutrophils and monocytes. During the lifespan of the cultures, the percentage of erythroid cells (glycophorin A) varied between 5 and 8 %, megakaryocyte lineage cells (CD61) were between 7 and 9 %, and B lymphocytes (CD19/CD20) and T lymphocytes/NK cells (CD2/CD3/CD7/CD56) were <1 %. In control cultures, cell production peaked at day 20 with around 1 × 107 cells generated, and mature neutrophils and monocytes were present in almost equal proportions (Fig. 2b). After day 20, cell production declined rapidly and the cultures had started to expire (cell density <0.5 × 105/ml) by day 30. The addition of 10 nM of the pan-antagonist AGN194310 led to a substantial and sustained increase in cell production, as revealed by the cumulative cell number. By day 20, around fourfold more cells had been produced in the antagonist-treated cultures than in control cultures, and the antagonist-treated cultures were maintained for as long as 55 days. An almost identical kinetic was observed for cultures supplemented with 100 nM AGN194310 (data not shown). Increased cell production by the antagonist-treated cultures up to day 20 was not attributable to a higher level of dead/apoptotic cells in control cultures, as few dead/apoptotic cells were present in both culture conditions, as observed by phase contact microscopy when counting cells and cells gated out in FACS analyses. As seen for control cultures, similar numbers of mature neutrophils and monocytes were produced in the antagonist-treated cultures (Fig. 2). The kinetic of increased production of total and myeloid cells by cultures treated with the pan-antagonist AGN194310 was not significantly different from the kinetic observed for cultures supplemented with 30 ng/ml G-CSF (Fig. 2a, b). G-CSF-supplemented cultures were maintained for as long as 55 days and also had produced fourfold more cells by day 30. We examined the extent to which cultures differentiated at similar or different rates by measuring the appearance of CD11b+ve cells (neutrophils and monocytes) and disappearance of CD33+ve immature myeloid cells. As to all culture conditions, CD11b+ve-differentiated myeloid cells appeared at a similar rate (Fig. 2a), and immature myeloid cells declined at the same rate (data not shown).
Short-Term Expansion of CD34+vehuHSC and Progenitors Underlies Antagonist-Driven Increased Myeloid Cell Production
The RAR antagonist AGN194310 did not slow down myeloid cell differentiation, and therefore, we examined whether enhanced expansion of CD34+vehuHSC and progenitors might underlie the increased production of myeloid cells and extended lifespan of cultures. In a series of experiments, various medium conditions were compared to optimize viability of the purified CD34+vehuHSC at the start of experiments. We examined the use of RPMI-1640 versus various hematopoietic growth media, different sera (FBS, horse and human), serum-free medium, SCF ± IL-3, and culturing the cells in normal oxygen levels (20 %), and at hypoxic conditions (1 %). Cell viability measurements and visual inspection of cultures at early time points revealed improved starting cell viability when CD34+vehuHSC cells were cultured in the hematopoietic growth medium HPGMTM supplemented with 10 % human serum and in normal oxygen levels. The addition of 100 ng/ml SCF was sufficient to ensure high starting cell viability. In all the above experiments, the levels of expansion of lineage−ve/CD133+ve/CD34+vehuHSC varied five- to eightfold by ~day 30.
Figure 3a shows an ~eightfold level of expansion of lineage−ve/CD133+ve/CD34+vehuHSC at day 30 when these cells were cultured in HPGMTM supplemented with 10 % human serum and 100 ng/ml SCF. The addition of the pan-antagonist AGN194310, at 100 nM, led to an increase in the rate of expansion of lineage−ve/CD133+ve/CD34+vehuHSC and the level of expansion of these cells, was increased to ~18-fold at day 30 (mean value for seven donors). Antagonizing RARα was sufficient to enhance expansion of lineage−ve/CD133+ve/CD34+ve huHSC and antagonizing RARγ did not improve cell expansion (Fig. 3a). In experiments using a further eight different donors, we used the pan-antagonist and the α antagonist. For all 15 donors, antagonizing either all RARs or RARα enhanced expansion of lineage−ve/CD133+ve/CD34+ve cells to the extent of around 20-fold, as compared to an 8–10-fold expansion seen in control cultures. Enhanced expansion occurred when cells from some donors were cultured in both flasks and wells.
For CD34+vehuHSCs cultured in wells for 2 weeks in the presence and absence of the pan-RAR antagonist AGN194310 (at 100 nM), we examined the presence of week-five CAFC, by plating onto MS5 feeder cells, and whether established week-five CAFC cultures were able to produce CFUs, to measure the presence of LTC-IC. CAFC and LTC-IC were only present in pan-RAR-antagonized wells (two donors). For 2 donors and at 2 weeks, we also examined the presence of CFUs in cultures grown in the presence and absence of the pan-antagonist AGN194310 (at 100 nM). As to culture of cells with the pan-antagonist AGN194310 vs control cultures, CFU-GEMM were 3 % of the total colony-forming units versus not detected, CFU-GM were 56 vs 93 %, and BFU-E together with CFU-E were 41 vs 7 %. The presence of the antagonist led to increases in the total number of CFUs, CFU-GEMM, and CFU-GM of between 10- and 30-fold. In control cultures, BFU-E/CFU-Es were at a very low level (7 % of total colonies) and the presence of the antagonist led to a high value for the expansion of these CFUs of 80- to 110-fold (Fig. 3b). This increase in BFU-E/CFU-E might be related to antagonism of the effect of ATRA that is present in FBS, as ATRA can specify a granulocyte fate (Tocci et al. 1996). Despite the sustained presence of CFUs, including maintenance of CFU-GEMM, in antagonist-treated cultures, these cultures gradually differentiated to produce neutrophils and macrophages, as shown in Fig. 2.
Selective Transactivation of RARα, RARβ, and RARγ by ATRA Is Concentration Related
The RARγ antagonist did not have an effect on the expansion of lineage−ve/CD133+ve/CD34+vehuHSC (Fig. 3), and the kinetics of the production of total cells, neutrophils, and monocytes observed for RARγ antagonist-treated cultures were identical to those shown for the control culture in Fig. 2. By day 20, around fourfold more cells (largely myeloid) had been produced in the α antagonist-treated cultures than in the γ antagonist-treated and control cultures.
A closed helix 12 conformation in RARγ, and RARβ has been reported to block binding of corepressors, and these RARs may activate expression of target genes in the absence of ligand (Farboud et al. 2003; Hauksdottir et al. 2003). We examined the levels of ATRA required to agonize RARs by transfecting CV-1 and LNCaP cells with an expression vector for each of the RAR isoforms together with an RAR reporter construct and treating these cells with ATRA. At concentrations below 10−9 M, preferential transactivation of RARβ and RARγ was observed (EC50’s = 0.39 × 10−9 and 0.36 × 10−9 M, respectively), with maximal activation occurring at ~5 × 10−9 M ATRA. ATRA had a minimal effect on transactivation via RARα at concentrations below 10−9 M (EC50 = 12 × 10−9 M) and a maximal effect was not observed until the ATRA concentration approached 10−7 M (Fig. 4a). Figure 4b shows LNCaP cells transfected with an expression vector for RARγ and reporter plasmid that ATRA also stimulated transactivation at sub-nanomolar concentrations (EC50 = 2.4 ± 1.0 × 10−10 M). Much higher concentrations of ATRA were required to produce significant transactivation of RARα for LNCaP cells transfected with this isoform (EC50 = 1.9 + 0.4 × 10−8 M) (Fig. 4b). These findings reveal that a tissue concentration of ATRA of ~10−9 M and below will selectively activate RARγ, and a much higher concentration (≫10−9 M) is required to maximally activate RARα.
Discussion
Previous studies have shown that agonizing RARα is sufficient to drive growth arrest and neutrophil differentiation of the promyeloid cell line HL60. Similarly, the RARα agonist was effective in driving neutrophil differentiation of NB-4 cells, and like ATRA, it enhanced monocyte differentiation of NB-4 and KG1 cells when used in combination with a low dose of 1,25D. In regard to the later, the RARα agonist was more potent than ATRA, as was used at 100 nM vs 1 μM ATRA. These findings are in keeping with activation of RARα which promotes myeloid cell differentiation.
Antagonizing RARs in cultures of CD34+vehuHSCs increased the generation of mature neutrophils and monocytes and prolonged the lifespan of the culture. We did not see a slowing down of differentiation, and the increased myeloid cell production was due to the enhancement of the short-term expansion of CD34+vehuHSC and progenitor cells. Abrogating RARα activity was sufficient to enhance expansion of CD34+vehuHSC and increase myeloid cell production. The improved level of expansion of CD34+vehuHSC may not be sufficient to be of benefit to rapidly expanding these cells in the case of an inadequate harvest for transplantation. However, RAR antagonist-provoked increased neutrophil production may be of benefit to patients with neutropenia if the effect can be seen in vivo.
Early work by Purton et al. (1999) highlighted the importance of retinoids to the differentiation of primitive hematopoietic cells. These workers showed that ATRA delays the differentiation of precursor cells, enhances the terminal maturation of progenitors that are committed to granulocyte/monocyte differentiation (Purton et al. 1999), and enhances the long-term repopulating activity of cultured HSCs (Purton et al. 2000). Walkley et al. (2002) and Chee et al. (2013) administered the pan-antagonist AGN194310 to mice and observed increases in myeloid progenitor cells and mature myeloid cells. As such, findings from these mouse studies and the CD34+vehuHSC culture experiments are in agreement. An AGN194310-provoked expansion of granulopoiesis was not seen in knockout mice lacking the receptor for G-CSF (G-CSFR) and Chee et al. (2013) hypothesized that G-CSFR signaling and RARs interact to regulate myeloid cell differentiation. In this regard, similar enhancement of myelopoiesis was seen in cultures of CD34+vehuHSC supplemented with either AGN194310 or G-CSF: the pan-antagonist appears to mimic the presence of G-GSF. The antagonist-provoked expansion of myelopoiesis may not be intrinsic to mouse and human HSC, and Chee and co-workers (2013) have concluded that the increase in myeloid cells in mice treated with AGN194310 was due to an increased production of G-CSF. This is a possibility for AGN19430-treated cultures of CD34+vehuHSC, as macrophages appear early, increase in number, and produce G-CSF (Chang et al. 2015; Demetri and Griffin 1991; Hareng and Hartung 2002). Even so, pathways that are both GSF-independent and RAR-independent exist to ensure granulopoiesis, as neutrophils are produced in mice doubly null for G-CSF and RARα or RARγ (Chee et al. 2013).
It was surprising to observe that the RARγ antagonist did not significantly affect cultures of CD34+vehuHSC, as Purton and co-workers have reported that RARγ-knockout mice have a reduced number of HSC. These workers also investigated the repopulating capacity of lineage−vec-kit+veSca1+ve (LSK+) cells from wild-type, RARγ+/+, RARα−/−, and RARγ−/−-mutant mice after culturing these cells for 14 days with ATRA. The findings from these experiments led to the conclusion that RARγ mediates the balance between HSC self-renewal and differentiation (Purton et al. 2006). However, the findings from studies of the influence of RARγ on cultures of CD34+vehuHSC and mouse LSK+ cannot be compared directly for two reasons. The absence of receptor (null mice) and use of ATRA, in the case of the mouse LSK+ experiments, is not the same as the presence of antagonized or otherwise RARγ as to the CD34+vehuHSC experiments. In addition, mouse LSK+ cells and CD34+vehuHSC are different in the extent of their cellular heterogeneity. In particular, CD34+vehuHSC are a less pure population of “true” stem cells which may have precluded seeing an effect on cells that are repopulating.
The role of RARγ is confounded by reports that this receptor does not repress and functions as an agonist when ligand is absent/undetectable (Farboud et al. 2003; Hauksdottir et al. 2003). We examined the possibility that RARγ is activated by an exceedingly low level of ATRA. Indeed, reporter assays revealed that ATRA activates RARγ at sub-nanomolar concentrations (10−10 M): a much higher concentration is required to activate RARα (10−8 M). The importance of this preferential activation is the overall tissue level of ATRA is low, as measured by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (Bleul et al. 2015), and RARs will be differentially activated, as the local concentration varies. In particular, the levels of ATRA in embryonic tissues are tightly controlled, gradients affect differential gene expression, and correct development (Rhinn and Dollé 2012), and boundaries are controlled by the ATRA-metabolizing enzyme retinaldehyde reductase DHRS3 (Billings et al. 2013). In vitro, stem cell differentiation can be regulated by controlling the ATRA gradient in a 3D scaffold (Tzezana et al. 2012). A striking example of the influence of local increase in the level of ATRA is that production by dendritic cells in the gut imprints the phenotype and gut homing tropism of effector T cells (Iwata et al. 2004).
In this study, a pharmacological amount of ATRA (1 μM) was used to differentiate NB-4 and KG1 cells, which is in keeping with activation of RARα to favor differentiation. Nanomolar ATRA should just lead to transactivation of RARγ, and the physiological importance of selectively activating RARγ has been revealed by treating zebra fish embryos with a low amount (10 nM) of an RARγ agonist (AGN205327). Stem cell populations were maintained at the expense of the development of bones and neural ganglia from cranial neural crest stem cells and pectoral and caudal fins from mesodermal stem cells. Appropriate development was restored by agonist washout or reversal with the RARγ antagonist. Hence, RARγ remaining in its non-ligand bound state or at a low level of activation is important to whether the above stem cell populations make a decision to adopt a fate and/or differentiate (Wai et al. 2015).
In summary, the findings reported here and by other workers support the notion that the balance of expression of RARα and RARγ and activities of these receptors, which can be governed by the local availability of ATRA, are important to HSCs retaining this status or embarking on myeloid cell differentiation. RARs and G-CSF appear to cooperate in their action which is of particular interest as growth factors, that include G-CSF, GM-CSF, M-CSF, erythropoietin, and Flt3 ligand, can instruct cell-fate decisions (reviewed in Brown et al. 2015; Grover et al. 2014; Metcalf 1991; Metcalf and Burgess 1982; Mossadegh-Keller et al. 2013; Rieger et al. 2009; Tsapogas et al. 2014). An understanding of the cooperative actions of RARs and G-CSF may well provide a better resolve to how HSCs govern their status.
References
Ablain J, de Thé H (2014) Retinoic acid signaling in cancer: the parable of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Int J Cancer 135:2262–2272
Allegretto E, McClurg MR, Lazarchik SB et al (1993) Transactivation properties of retinoic acid and retinoid X receptors in mammalian cells and yeast. Correlation with hormone binding and effects of metabolism. J Biol Chem 268:26625–26633
Baurska H, Klopot A, Kielbinski M et al (2011) Structure-function analysis of vitamin D2 analogs as potential inducers of leukemia differentiation and inhibitors of prostate cancer proliferation. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 126:46–54
Billings SE, Pierzchalski K, Butler Tjaden NE et al (2013) The retinaldehyde reductase DHRS3 is essential for preventing the formation of excess retinoic acid during embryonic development. FASEB J 27:4877–4889
Bleul T, Rühl R, Bulashevska S et al (2015) Reduced retinoids and retinoid receptors’ expression in pancreatic cancer: a link to patient survival. Mol Carcinog 54:870–879
Breitman T, Selonick S, Collins S (1980) Induction of differentiation of the human promyelocytic leukemia cell line (HL-60) by retinoic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:2936–2940
Brown G, Mooney CJ, Alberti-Servera L et al (2015) Versatility of stem and progenitor cells and the instructive actions of cytokines on hematopoiesis. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 52:168–179
Chambon P (1996) A decade of molecular biology of retinoic acid receptors. FASEB J 10:940–954
Chang SF, Lin SS, Yang HC et al (2015) LPS-induced G-CSF expression in macrophages is mediated by ERK2, but not ERK1. PLoS One 10:e0129685
Chee LC, Hendy J, Purton LE et al (2013) The granulocyte-colony stimulating factor receptor (G-CSFR) interacts with retinoic acid receptors (RARs) in the regulation of myeloid differentiation. J Leukoc Biol 93:235–243
de Wynter E, Ploemacher R (2001) Assays for the assessment of human hematopoietic stem cells. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 15:23–27
Demetri GD, Griffin JD (1991) Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and its receptor. Blood 78:2791–2808
Denning-Kendall P, Donaldson C, Nicol A et al (1996) Optimal processing of human umbilical cord blood for clinical banking. Exp Hematol 24:1394–1401
Dollé P, Ruberte E, Leroy P et al (1990) Retinoic acid receptors and cellular retinoid binding proteins. I. A systematic study of their differential pattern of transcription during mouse organogenesis. Development 110:1133–1151
Farboud B, Hauksdottir H, Wu Y et al (2003) Isotype-restricted corepressor recruitment: a constitutively closed helix 12 conformation in retinoic acid receptors beta and gamma interferes with corepressor recruitment and prevents transcriptional repression. Mol Cell Biol 23:2844–2858
Germain P, Chambon P, Eichele G et al (2006) International union of pharmacology. LX. Retinoic acid receptors. Pharmacol Rev 58:712–725
Ghyselinck NB, Dupé V, Dierich A et al (1997) Role of the retinoic acid receptor beta (RARbeta) during mouse development. Int J Dev Biol 41:425–447
Gocek E, Marchwicka A, Baurska H et al (2012) Opposite regulation of vitamin D receptor by ATRA in AML cells susceptible and resistant to vitamin D-induced differentiation. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 132:220–226
Gratas C, Menot ML, Dresch C et al (1993) Retinoid acid supports granulocytic but not erythroid differentiation of myeloid progenitors in normal bone marrow cells. Leukemia 7:1156–1162
Grover A, Mancini E, Moore S et al (2014) Erythropoietin guides multipotent hematopoietic progenitor cells toward an erythroid fate. J Exp Med 211:181–188
Gu T, Goss VL, Reeves C et al (2006) Phosphotyrosine profiling identifies the KG-1 cell line as a model for the study of FGFR1 fusions in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 108:4202–4204
Hammond L, Brown G, Keedwell R et al (2002) The prospects of retinoids in the treatment of prostate cancer. Anticancer Drugs 13:781–790
Hareng L, Hartung T (2002) Induction and regulation of endogenous granulocyte colony-stimulating factor formation. Biol Chem 383:1501–1517
Hauksdottir H, Farboud B, Privalsky M (2003) Retinoic acid receptors beta and gamma do not repress, but instead activate target gene transcription in both the absence and presence of hormone ligand. Mol Endocrinol 17:373–385
Heyman R, Mangelsdorf D, Dyck J et al (1992) 9-cis retinoic acid is a high affinity ligand for the retinoid X receptor. Cell 68:397–406
Hughes P, Zhao Y, Chandraratna R et al (2006) Retinoid-mediated stimulation of steroid sulfatase activity in myeloid leukemic cell lines requires RARalpha and RXR and involves the phosphoinositide 3-kinase and ERK-MAP kinase pathways. J Cell Biochem 97:327–350
Iwata M, Hirakiyama A, Eshima Y et al (2004) Retinoic acid imprints gut-homing specificity on T cells. Immunity 21:527–538
Johnson A, Klein E, Gillett S et al (1995) Synthesis and characterization of a highly potent and effective antagonist of retinoic acid receptors. J Med Chem 38:4764–4767
Kastner P, Mark M, Chambon P (1995) Nonsteroid nuclear receptors: what are genetic studies telling us about their role in real life? Cell 83:859–869
Kastner P, Mark M, Ghyselinck N et al (1997) Genetic evidence that the retinoid signal is transduced by heterodimeric RXR/RAR functional units during mouse development. Development 124:313–326
Kastner P, Lawrence HJ, Waltzinger C et al (2001) Positive and negative regulation of granulopoiesis by endogenous RARalpha. Blood 97:1314–1320
Klein E, Pino ME, Johnson AT et al (1996) Identification and functional separation of retinoic acid receptor neutral antagonists and inverse agonists. J Biol Chem 271:22692–22696
Lanotte M, Martin-Thouvenin V, Najman S et al (1991) NB4, a maturation inducible cell line with t(15;17) marker isolated from a human acute promyelocytic leukemia (M3). Blood 77:1080–1086
Li E, Sucov HM, Lee KF et al (1993) Normal development and growth of mice carrying a targeted disruption of the alpha 1 retinoic acid receptor gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:1590–1594
Lohnes D, Kastner P, Dierich A et al (1993) Function of retinoic acid receptor gamma in the mouse. Cell 73:643–658
Mendoza-Parra M-A, Gronemeyer H (2013) Genome-wide studies of nuclear receptors in cell fate decisions. Semin Cell Dev Biol 24:706–715
Mengeling BJ, Phan TQ, Goodson ML et al (2011) Aberrant corepressor interactions implicated in PML-RAR(alpha) and PLZF-RAR(alpha) leukemogenesis reflect an altered recruitment and release of specific NCoR and SMRT splice variants. J Biol Chem 286:4236–4247
Metcalf D (1991) Lineage commitment of hemopoietic progenitor cells in developing blast cell colonies: influence of colony-stimulating factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:11310–11314
Metcalf D, Burgess AW (1982) Clonal analysis of progenitor cell commitment of granulocyte or macrophage production. J Cell Physiol 111:275–283
Mossadegh-Keller N, Sarrazin S, Kandalla PK et al (2013) M-CSF instructs myeloid lineage fate in single haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 497:239–243
Mountford JC, Bunce CM, French PJ et al (1994) Intracellular concentrations of inositol, glycerophosphoinositol and inositol pentakisphosphate increase during haemopoietic cell differentiation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1222:101–108
Nagpal S, Chandraratna R (1996) Retinoids as anti-cancer agents. Curr Pharm Design 2:295–316
Nagpal S, Chandraratna R (2000) Recent developments in receptor-selective retinoids. Curr Pharm Des 6:919–931
Nagpal S, Athanikar J, Chandraratna RA (1995) Separation of transactivation and AP1 antagonism functions of retinoic acid receptor alpha. J Biol Chem 270:923–927
Nicol A, Nieda M, Donaldson C et al (1996) Cryopreserved human bone marrow stroma is fully functional in vitro. Br J Haematol 94:258–265
Niederreither K, Dollé P (2008) Retinoic acid in development: towards an integrated view. Nat Rev Genet 9:541–553
Purton L, Bernstein I, Collins S (1999) All-trans retinoic acid delays the differentiation of primitive hematopoietic precursors (lin-c-kit+Sca-1(+)) while enhancing the terminal maturation of committed granulocyte/monocyte progenitors. Blood 94:483–495
Purton L, Bernstein I, Collins S (2000) All-trans retinoic acid enhances the long-term repopulating activity of cultured hematopoietic stem cells. Blood 95:470–477
Purton LE, Dworkin S, Olsen GH et al (2006) RARgamma is critical for maintaining a balance between hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. J Exp Med 203:1283–1293
Rhinn M, Dollé P (2012) Retinoic acid signalling during development. Development 139:843–858
Rieger MA, Hoppe PS, Smejkal BM et al (2009) Hematopoietic cytokines can instruct lineage choice. Science 325:217–218
Subbarayan V, Kastner P, Mark M et al (1997) Limited specificity and large overlap of the functions of the mouse RAR gamma 1 and RAR gamma 2 isoforms. Mech Dev 66:131–142
Sucov HM, Evans RM (1995) Retinoic acid and retinoic acid receptors in development. Mol Neurobiol 10:169–184
Teng M, Duong T, Klein E et al (1996) Identification of a retinoic acid receptor alpha subtype specific agonist. J Med Chem 39:3035–3038
Tocci A, Parolini I, Gabbianelli M et al (1996) Dual action of retinoic acid on human embryonic/fetal hematopoiesis: blockade of primitive progenitor proliferation and shift from multipotent/erythroid/monocytic to granulocytic differentiation program. Blood 88:2878–2888
Tsai S, Collins S (1993) A dominant negative retinoic acid receptor blocks neutrophil differentiation at the promyelocyte stage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:7153–7157
Tsapogas P, Swee LK, Nusser A et al (2014) In vivo evidence for an instructive role of fms-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) ligand in hematopoietic development. Haematologica 99:638–646
Tzezana R, Reznik S, Blumenthal J et al (2012) Regulation of stem cell differentiation by control of retinoic acid gradients in hydrospun 3D scaffold. Macromol Biosci 12:598–607
Wai H, Kawakami K, Wada H et al (2015) The development and growth of tissues derived from cranial neural crest and primitive mesoderm is dependent on the ligation status of retinoic acid receptor γ: evidence that retinoic acid receptor γ functions to maintain stem/progenitor cells in the absence of retinoic acid. Stem Cells Dev 24:507–519
Walkley C, Yuan Y, Chandraratna R et al (2002) Retinoic acid receptor antagonism in vivo expands the numbers of precursor cells during granulopoiesis. Leukemia 16:1763–1772
Wang W, Yang J, Liu H et al (2011) Rapid and efficient reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells by retinoic acid receptor gamma and liver receptor homolog 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:18283–18288
Yan TD, Wu H, Zhang HP et al (2010) Oncogenic potential of retinoic acid receptor-gamma in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res 70:2285–2295
Acknowledgments
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development, and demonstration under Grant agreement no. 315902. One author AC gratefully acknowledges receipt of a Marie Curie Research Fellowship. GB, EM, AM, and KMT are participants within the Marie Curie Initial Training Network DECIDE (Decision-making within cells and differentiation entity therapies). AM is recipient of the Grant PRELUDIUM No 2013/11/N/NZ3/00197 from the National Science Centre in Poland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest
Human CD34+ve cells were purified from the blood of normal human adult donors and post-mobilization of stem cells to the blood. Ethics approval for the use of adult human blood-mobilized stem cells (CD34+vehuHSC) was from the West Midlands Research Ethics Committee. Informed consent was obtained by the regional National Blood Service Stem Cell Laboratory in Birmingham.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, G., Marchwicka, A., Cunningham, A. et al. Antagonizing Retinoic Acid Receptors Increases Myeloid Cell Production by Cultured Human Hematopoietic Stem Cells. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 65, 69–81 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-016-0411-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-016-0411-0