Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Process knowledge modeling

  • Session 2: Processes
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Modeling — ER '96 (ER 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1157))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 176 Accesses

Abstract

Knowledge is connected to a subject (a theory, a lesson) but Process Knowledge is connected to an object and to its production process. This leads to the need for a specific approach to the actual use of process knowledge models while carrying out processes. Models may then be constructed to guide, support and provide advice or instructions to users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. John Anderson and G. Bower. Human associative memory. Winston-Wiley, Washington D.C., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Armenise, S. Bandinelli, C. Ghezzi and A. Morzenti. A survey and assessment of software process representation formalisms. In: Int. Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 3 (3), 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Larry Bielawski and Robert Lewand. Intelligent systems design: integrating expert systems, hypermedia and databases. New-York: Willey. 1991. 302p.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gary Born. Apache: a pictorial CASE tool for business process engineering. In: Software assistance for business re-engineering. Kathy Spurr, Paul Layell, Leslie Jennison, Neil Richards. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1993. pp. 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Michael L. Brodie, John Mylopoulos and Joachim W. Schmidt. On conceptual modelling. New-York: Springer-Verlag, 1984. 510p.

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. Bush. As we may think. The Atlantic monthly, 176(1), July 1945, pp. 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  7. David Carlson, Sudha Ram. Hyperintelligence: the next frontier. In: Communication of the ACM. vol. 33, n.3. March 1990, pp. 311–321.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. P. Chen. The entity-relationship model. Toward a unified view of data. ACM Trans. Database Syst. V. 1, N.1 (March 1976), pp. 9–36.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Conklin. Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Computer, September 1987, Vol. 2, N.9, pp. 17–41.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bill Curtis, Marc I. Kellner and Jim Over. Process Modeling. In: Communication of the ACM. Sept 1992, V. 35, N.9, pp. 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Laura DeYoung. Hypertext challenges in auditing domain. In: Hypertext'89 proceedings, November 1989. pp169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Scott E. Fahlman. NETL: a system for representing and using real-world knowledge. MIT press, Cambridge, MA, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Faramarz Farhoodi. Caddie: an advanced tool for organisational design and process modelling. In: Software assistance for business re-engineering. Kathy Spurr, Paul Layell, Leslie Jennison, Neil Richards. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1993. pp. 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Franck R. Hickman and al. Analysis for knowledge-based systems, A practical guide to the KADS methodology. New-York: Ellis Horwood, 1989. 190p.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Koichi Hori. A system for aiding creative concept formation. In: IEEE Transaction on systems and cybernetics. Vol. 24, N.6, June 1994, p. 882–894.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ISO. Information Processing — Text and office systems — Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML), ISO 8879, 1986, 155p.

    Google Scholar 

  17. ISO. Information Processing — Text and office systems — Office Document Architecture (ODA) and Interchange format. ISO 8613, 1989, Parts 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Khoshasfian, A. Brad Baker, R. Abnous and K. Shepherd. Intelligent offices. New-York: Willey, 1991. 424p.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tim Korson and John D. McGregor. Understanding object-oriented: a unified paradigm. In: Communication of the ACM Sept 90, Vol33, N.9, pp40–60.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pierre Maret. Process knowledge modeling and re-use. PhD Thesis (in French). National Institute of Applied Sciences (INSA). October 1995. 227p.

    Google Scholar 

  21. V. deMey, O. Nierstrasz. The ITHACA application development environment. In: Visual objects, Tsichritzis (ed.): Genève University, 1993. pp.265.278.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Michael Mills and Clive Mabey. Automating business process re-engineering with the Business Design Facility. In: Software assistance for business re-engineering. Kathy Spurr, Paul Layell, Leslie Jennison, Neil Richards. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1993. pp. 153–176.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Minsky. A framework for representing knowledge. In: P. Winston Ed. The psychology of computer vision, NYC Mc Graw Hill, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chris Moss. The development environment for business process re-engineering. In: Software assistance for business re-engineering. Kathy Spurr, Paul Layell, Leslie Jennison, Neil Richards. Chichester: Wiley and Sons, 1993. pp. 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  25. C. A. Petri, Kommunikation mit Automaten, Schriften des Rheinisch. Westfalischen Institutes für Instrumentelle Mathematik, UniversitÄt Bonn, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Piaget. Understanding causality. New-York: Norton. 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ross Quillian. Semantic memory. In: Semantic information processing (Minsky Ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Arkalgud Ramaprasad. Cognitive process as a basis for MIS and DSS design. In: Management Science. V. 33, N.2, February 1987, pp. 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rank Xerox France. GraphTalk, Metamodeling. Reference manual and Programming Interface, December 1993. 670p.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Colette Rolland, C. Souveyet and M. Moreno M. An approach for defining ways-of-working. In: Information Systems. Vol. 20, N.4, pp337–359. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  31. E. Rosch. Cognitive representation of semantic categories. Journal of experimental psychology: general. N.104, pp. 192–233.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Arvind Sathi, Mark S. Fox and Michael Greenberg. Representation of activity knowledge for project management. In: IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence. V. 7, N.5, September 1985. pp531–552.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Patricia Search. Computer graphics: changing the language of visual com. In: Journal of the society for technical com., vol. 40, n.4, Nov 1993, pp. 629–637.

    Google Scholar 

  34. D. B. Simmons, N. C. Ellis and T. D. Escamilla. Manager associate. In: IEEE Transaction on knowledge and data engi.. V. 5, N.3, June 1993, pp. 426–438.

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. M. Smith and D.C.P. Smith. Database abstraction: aggregation and generalization. ACM Trans. Database Syst. V. 2, N.2 (1977). pp. 105–133.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kathy Spurr, Paul Layell, Leslie Jennison, Neil Richards. Software assistance for business re-engineering. Chichester: Wiley and Sons. 1993. 224p.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jason T. L. Wang and Peter A. Ng. Texpros: an intelligent document processing system. In: International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. V. 2, N.2, 1992. pp. 171–196.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bob Wielinga, Walter Van de Velde, Guus Schreiber and Hans Akkermans. Towards a unification of knowledge modelling approaches. 1993: Simmons (eds.), Spring Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Terry Winograd. Langage as a cognitive process. Vol.1 Syntax. Addison Wesley. 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  40. L. Young. Knowledge-based systems for idea processing support. In: Data Base Fall 1990, pp.27–33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LISI, INSA-Lyon, Bât 502, F-69621, Villeurbanne Cedex, France

    Pierre Maret & Jean-Marie Pinon

Authors
  1. Pierre Maret
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jean-Marie Pinon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Bernhard Thalheim

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Maret, P., Pinon, JM. (1996). Process knowledge modeling. In: Thalheim, B. (eds) Conceptual Modeling — ER '96. ER 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1157. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0019917

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0019917

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61784-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70685-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation