Abstract
Several important behavioral intervention models have been developed for teaching language to children with autism and two are compared in this paper. Professionals adhering to Skinner’s conceptualization of language refer to their curriculum and intervention programming as applied verbal behavior (AVB). Those primarily focused on developing and using strategies embedded in natural settings that promote generalization refer to their interventions as naturalistic teaching approaches (NTAs). The purpose of this paper is to describe each approach and discuss similarities and differences in terms of relevant dimensions of stimulus control. The discussion includes potential barriers to translation of terminology between the two approaches that we feel can be overcome to allow better communication and collaboration between the two communities. Common naturalistic teaching procedures are described and a Skinnerian conceptualization of these learning events is provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Charlop-Christy, M. H., & Carpenter, M. H. (2000). Modified incidental teaching sessions: A procedure for parents to increase spontaneous speech in their children with autism. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 98–112.
Charlop-Christy, M. H., LeBlanc, L. A., & Carpenter, M. H. (1999). Naturalistic Teaching Strategies (NaTS) to teach speech to Children with Autism: Historical perspective, development, and current practice. California School Psychologist, 4, 30–46.
Drash, P. W., High, R. L., & Tudor, R. M. (1999). Using mand training to establish an echoic repertoire in young children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 16, 29–44.
Duran, E. (1996). Functional language and other language intervention strategies. In E. Duran (Ed.), Teaching students with moderate/severe disabilities, including autism (pp. 50–73). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Fenske, E. C., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (2001) Incidental teaching: A not-discrete-trial teaching procedure. In Maurice, C., Green, G., & Foxx, R. M. (Eds.), Making a Difference: Behaivoral intervention for autism (pp. 75–82). Austin, TX: PROED.
Finkel, A. S. & Williams, R. L. (2001). A comparison of textual and echoic prompts on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior in a six-year old boy with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 61–70.
Hall, G., & Sundberg, M. L. (1987). Teaching mands by manipulating conditioned establishing operations. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 41–53.
Halle, J. W. (1982). Teaching functional language to the handicapped: An integrative model of natural environment teaching techniques. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7, 29–37.
Halle, J. W. (1987). Teaching language in the natural environment: An analysis of spontaneity. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 28–37.
Halle, J. W., Alpert, C. L., & Anderson, S. R. (1984). Natural environment language assessment and intervention with severely impaired preschoolers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 4, 36–56.
Hart, B. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Establishing use of descriptive adjectives in the spontaneous speech of disadvantaged preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 109–120.
Hemmeter, M. L., Ault, M. J., Collins, B. C., & Meyer, S. (1996). The effects of teacher-implemented language instruction within free time activities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 203–212.
Koegel, L. K., Carter, C. M., & Koegel, R. L. (2003). Teaching children with autism self-initiations as a pivotal response. Topics in Language Disorders, 23, 134–145.
Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., Harrower, J. K., & Carter, C. M. (1999). Pivotal response intervention I: Overview of Approach. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 24, 174–185.
Koegel, R. L., Koegel, L. K., & Brookman, L. I. (2003). Empirically supported pivotal response interventions for children with autism. In A. E. Kazdin & J. R. Weisz (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents (pp. 341–357). New York: Guilford Press.
Koegel, R. L., Koegel, L. K., & McNerney, E. K. (2001). Pivotal areas in intervention for autism. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 1, 19–32.
Koegel, R. L., Koegel, L. K., & Surratt, A. (1992). Language intervention and disruptive behavior in preschool children with autism. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 22, 141–153.
Koegel, R. L., O’Dell, M. C., & Koegel, L. K. (1987). A natural language paradigm for teaching non-verbal autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 17, 187–199.
Koegel, R. L., Schreibman, L., Good, A., Cerniglia, L., Murphy, C., & Koegel, L. C. (1989). How to teach pivotal responses to children with autism: A training manual. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California Press.
Laski, K. E., Charlop, M. H., & Schreibman, L. (1988). Training parents to use the Natural Language Paradigm to increase their autistic children’s speech. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 391–400.
Leaf, R., and McEachin, J. J. (1999). A work in progress: Behavior management strategies and a curriculum for intensive behavioral treatment of autism. New York: Different Roads to Learning.
Lovaas O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 55, 3–9.
Lovaas, O. I. (2003). Teaching individuals with developmental delays: Basic intervention techniques. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Lovaas, O. I., Koegel, R. L., Simmons, J. Q., & Long, J. S. (1973). Some generalization and follow-up measures on children with autism in behavior therapy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 131–166.
McEachin, J. J., Smith, T., & Lovaas, O. I. (1993). Long term outcome for children with autism who received early intensive behavioral treatment. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 97, 359–372.
McGee, G. G., Krantz, P. J., Mason, D., & McClannahan, L. E. (1983). A modified incidental teaching procedure for autistic youth: Acquisition and generalization of receptive object labels. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 329–338.
McGee, G. G., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (1985). The facilitative effects of incidental teaching on preposition use by autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 17–31.
McGee, G. G., Morrier, M., & Daly, T. (1999). An incidental teaching approach to early intervention for toddlers with autism. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 133–146.
Michael, J. (1993). Establishing operations. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 191–206.
Michael, J. (2000). Implications and refinements of the establishing operation concept. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 401–410.
Mobayed, K.L., Collins, B. C., Strangis, D. E., Schuster, J.W., & Hemmeter, M. L. (2000). Teaching parents to employ Mand-Model procedures to teach their children requesting. Journal of Early Intervention, 23, 165–179.
Rogers-Warren, A. & Warren, S. F. (1980). Mands for verbalization: Facilitating the display of newly trained language in children. Behavior Modification, 4, 361–382.
Sigafoos, J. & Reichle, J. (1993). Establishing spontaneous verbal behavior. In R. A. Gable & S. F. Warren (Eds.), Strategies for teaching students with Mild to Severe Mental Retardation (pp. 191–230). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Cambridge, MA: Prentice Hall.
Smith, T. (1998). Outcome of early intervention for children with autism. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 6, 33–49.
Smith, T., Donahoe, P. A., & Davis, B. J. (2001). The UCLA Young Autism Project. In J. S. Handleman and S. L. Harris (Eds.), Preschool education programs for children with autism. Austin TX: Pro-Ed.
Stokes, T. F. & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.
Sundberg, M. L., Edicott, K., & Eigenheer, P. (2000). Using intraverbal prompts to establish tacts for children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 17, 89–104.
Sundberg, M. L., Loeb, M., Hale, L., & Eigenheer, P. (2001). Contriving establishing operations to teach mands for information. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 15–29.
Sundberg, M. & Michael, J. (2001). The benefits of Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior for children with autism. Behavior Modification, 25, 698–724.
Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism or other developmental disabilities. Pleasant Hill, CA: Behavior Analysts, Inc.
Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1999). The need for both discrete trial and natural environment language training for children with autism. In P. M. Ghezzi, W. L. Williams, and J. E. Carr (Eds.), Autism: Behavior analytic perspectives (pp. 139–156). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Warren, S. F., McQuarter, R. M., & Rogers-Warren, A. K. (1984). The effects of mands and models on the speech of unresponsive language-delayed preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 43–52.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors would like to thank members of the Esch Behavior Consultants lab for their comments and suggestions on previous versions of the manuscript. A portion of this manuscript was presented as a paper at the May 2005 convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis in Chicago, IL.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LeBlanc, L.A., Esch, J., Sidener, T.M. et al. Behavioral Language Interventions for Children with Autism: Comparing Applied Verbal Behavior and Naturalistic Teaching Approaches. Analysis Verbal Behav 22, 49–60 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393026
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393026