Skip to main content
Log in

Behavioral Language Interventions for Children with Autism: Comparing Applied Verbal Behavior and Naturalistic Teaching Approaches

  • Published:
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several important behavioral intervention models have been developed for teaching language to children with autism and two are compared in this paper. Professionals adhering to Skinner’s conceptualization of language refer to their curriculum and intervention programming as applied verbal behavior (AVB). Those primarily focused on developing and using strategies embedded in natural settings that promote generalization refer to their interventions as naturalistic teaching approaches (NTAs). The purpose of this paper is to describe each approach and discuss similarities and differences in terms of relevant dimensions of stimulus control. The discussion includes potential barriers to translation of terminology between the two approaches that we feel can be overcome to allow better communication and collaboration between the two communities. Common naturalistic teaching procedures are described and a Skinnerian conceptualization of these learning events is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Charlop-Christy, M. H., & Carpenter, M. H. (2000). Modified incidental teaching sessions: A procedure for parents to increase spontaneous speech in their children with autism. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 98–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlop-Christy, M. H., LeBlanc, L. A., & Carpenter, M. H. (1999). Naturalistic Teaching Strategies (NaTS) to teach speech to Children with Autism: Historical perspective, development, and current practice. California School Psychologist, 4, 30–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drash, P. W., High, R. L., & Tudor, R. M. (1999). Using mand training to establish an echoic repertoire in young children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 16, 29–44.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Duran, E. (1996). Functional language and other language intervention strategies. In E. Duran (Ed.), Teaching students with moderate/severe disabilities, including autism (pp. 50–73). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenske, E. C., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (2001) Incidental teaching: A not-discrete-trial teaching procedure. In Maurice, C., Green, G., & Foxx, R. M. (Eds.), Making a Difference: Behaivoral intervention for autism (pp. 75–82). Austin, TX: PROED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, A. S. & Williams, R. L. (2001). A comparison of textual and echoic prompts on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior in a six-year old boy with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G., & Sundberg, M. L. (1987). Teaching mands by manipulating conditioned establishing operations. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 41–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Halle, J. W. (1982). Teaching functional language to the handicapped: An integrative model of natural environment teaching techniques. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7, 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, J. W. (1987). Teaching language in the natural environment: An analysis of spontaneity. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halle, J. W., Alpert, C. L., & Anderson, S. R. (1984). Natural environment language assessment and intervention with severely impaired preschoolers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 4, 36–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Establishing use of descriptive adjectives in the spontaneous speech of disadvantaged preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 109–120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmeter, M. L., Ault, M. J., Collins, B. C., & Meyer, S. (1996). The effects of teacher-implemented language instruction within free time activities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 203–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, L. K., Carter, C. M., & Koegel, R. L. (2003). Teaching children with autism self-initiations as a pivotal response. Topics in Language Disorders, 23, 134–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., Harrower, J. K., & Carter, C. M. (1999). Pivotal response intervention I: Overview of Approach. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 24, 174–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., Koegel, L. K., & Brookman, L. I. (2003). Empirically supported pivotal response interventions for children with autism. In A. E. Kazdin & J. R. Weisz (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents (pp. 341–357). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., Koegel, L. K., & McNerney, E. K. (2001). Pivotal areas in intervention for autism. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 1, 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., Koegel, L. K., & Surratt, A. (1992). Language intervention and disruptive behavior in preschool children with autism. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 22, 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., O’Dell, M. C., & Koegel, L. K. (1987). A natural language paradigm for teaching non-verbal autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 17, 187–199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, R. L., Schreibman, L., Good, A., Cerniglia, L., Murphy, C., & Koegel, L. C. (1989). How to teach pivotal responses to children with autism: A training manual. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laski, K. E., Charlop, M. H., & Schreibman, L. (1988). Training parents to use the Natural Language Paradigm to increase their autistic children’s speech. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 391–400.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Leaf, R., and McEachin, J. J. (1999). A work in progress: Behavior management strategies and a curriculum for intensive behavioral treatment of autism. New York: Different Roads to Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 55, 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, O. I. (2003). Teaching individuals with developmental delays: Basic intervention techniques. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, O. I., Koegel, R. L., Simmons, J. Q., & Long, J. S. (1973). Some generalization and follow-up measures on children with autism in behavior therapy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 131–166.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McEachin, J. J., Smith, T., & Lovaas, O. I. (1993). Long term outcome for children with autism who received early intensive behavioral treatment. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 97, 359–372.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, G. G., Krantz, P. J., Mason, D., & McClannahan, L. E. (1983). A modified incidental teaching procedure for autistic youth: Acquisition and generalization of receptive object labels. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 329–338.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, G. G., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (1985). The facilitative effects of incidental teaching on preposition use by autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 17–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, G. G., Morrier, M., & Daly, T. (1999). An incidental teaching approach to early intervention for toddlers with autism. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 133–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1993). Establishing operations. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 191–206.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (2000). Implications and refinements of the establishing operation concept. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 401–410.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mobayed, K.L., Collins, B. C., Strangis, D. E., Schuster, J.W., & Hemmeter, M. L. (2000). Teaching parents to employ Mand-Model procedures to teach their children requesting. Journal of Early Intervention, 23, 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers-Warren, A. & Warren, S. F. (1980). Mands for verbalization: Facilitating the display of newly trained language in children. Behavior Modification, 4, 361–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigafoos, J. & Reichle, J. (1993). Establishing spontaneous verbal behavior. In R. A. Gable & S. F. Warren (Eds.), Strategies for teaching students with Mild to Severe Mental Retardation (pp. 191–230). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Cambridge, MA: Prentice Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. (1998). Outcome of early intervention for children with autism. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 6, 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T., Donahoe, P. A., & Davis, B. J. (2001). The UCLA Young Autism Project. In J. S. Handleman and S. L. Harris (Eds.), Preschool education programs for children with autism. Austin TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, T. F. & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. L., Edicott, K., & Eigenheer, P. (2000). Using intraverbal prompts to establish tacts for children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 17, 89–104.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. L., Loeb, M., Hale, L., & Eigenheer, P. (2001). Contriving establishing operations to teach mands for information. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. & Michael, J. (2001). The benefits of Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior for children with autism. Behavior Modification, 25, 698–724.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism or other developmental disabilities. Pleasant Hill, CA: Behavior Analysts, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1999). The need for both discrete trial and natural environment language training for children with autism. In P. M. Ghezzi, W. L. Williams, and J. E. Carr (Eds.), Autism: Behavior analytic perspectives (pp. 139–156). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, S. F., McQuarter, R. M., & Rogers-Warren, A. K. (1984). The effects of mands and models on the speech of unresponsive language-delayed preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 43–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda A. LeBlanc Ph.D..

Additional information

The authors would like to thank members of the Esch Behavior Consultants lab for their comments and suggestions on previous versions of the manuscript. A portion of this manuscript was presented as a paper at the May 2005 convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis in Chicago, IL.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

LeBlanc, L.A., Esch, J., Sidener, T.M. et al. Behavioral Language Interventions for Children with Autism: Comparing Applied Verbal Behavior and Naturalistic Teaching Approaches. Analysis Verbal Behav 22, 49–60 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393026

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393026

Key words

Navigation