Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Die Bedeutung des Realoptionsansatzes aus Controllingsicht

  • Theorie der Investition
  • Published:
Controlling und Management Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Achleitner, A.-K. /Thoma, G.F.: Handbuch Corporate Finance, Neuwied o. D.

  • Aggarwal, R.: Capital Budgeting Under Uncertainty, New Jersey 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, P.: Traps, Pitfalls and Snares in the Valuation of Technology, Research Technology Management, Vol. 41 (1998), Nr. 5, S. 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, E.H./ Hurry, D.: Strategy Through the Option Lens: An Integrated View of Resource Investments and the Incremental Choice Process, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18 (1993), Nr. 4, S. 760–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brealey, R. / Myers, S. C.: Principles of Corporate Finance, 5. Auflage, New York, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M. / Schwartz, E.: Evaluating Natural Ressource Investments, Journal of Business, Vol. 58 (1985), Nr. 2, S. 135–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M./ Schwartz, E.: A New Approach to Evaluating Natural Resource Investments, in: Chew, D. H. (Hrsg.): The New Corporate Finance, 1993, S. 98–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M. / Trigeorgis, L.: Project Flexibility, Agency, and Competition, Oxford 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby, J. S. / Pitts, C. G. (1997b): Real Options and Capital Investment Decisions, Management Accounting, Vol. 75 (1997), Nr. 10, S. 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, P.: The Valuation of Sequential Exchange Opportunities, Journal of Finance, Vol. 43 (1988), Nr. 5, S. 1235–1256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, K.H./ Charoenwong, C.: Investment Options, Assets in Place, and the Risk of Stocks, Financial Management, Vol. 20 (1991), Nr. 3, S. 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland T./ Koller, T./ Murrin, J.: Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies, 3nd edition, New York 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derman, E.: Model Risk, Risk Management Series, Goldman Sachs.

  • Drukarczyk J.: Unternehmensbewertung, 2. Auflage, München 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, T. W.: Applying ‚Options Thinking’ to R&D Valuation, Research Technology Management, Vol. 39 (1996), Nr. 3, S. 50–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, T. W.: Strategic Thinking: A Foundation for Strategy Formulation Derived from Options Pricing Theory, Increasing Returns Economics, and Complexity Theory, Working Paper, Kodak 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figlewski, S. / Green, C.T.: Market Risk and Model Risk for a Financial Institution Writing Options, Journal of Finance, Vol. 54 (1999), Nr. 4, S. 1465–1499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenadier, S.R./ Weiss, A.M.: Investment in Technological Innovations: An Option Pricing Approach, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 44 (1997), Nr. 3, S. 397–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R. / Abernathy, W.: Managing Our Way to Economic Decline, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 60 (1980), No. 3, S. 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R. / Garvin, D.: Managing as if Tomorrow Mattered, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 60 (1982), No. 3, S. 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, A.: Gestaltung von Controllership. Die Zuordnung von Aufgaben zu Controllern, Wiesbaden 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, U. / Lehmann, H.: Einsatzmöglichkeiten des Realoptionsansatzes in der New Economy aus Controlling-Sicht. In. Controlling, 13. Jg. (2000), Nr. 4, S. 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, U. / Pritsch, G. (1999a): Marktorientierte Investitionsbewertung mit dem Realoptinsansatz: Ein Implementierungsleitfaden für die Praxis, Finanzmarkt und Portfolio Management, 13. Jg. (1999), Nr. 2, S. 121–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester, C. W.: Today’s Options for Tomorrow’s Growth, Harvard Business Review, Vol 62 (1984), Nr. 2, S. 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester, C. W.: Turning Growth Options into Real Assets, in: Aggarwal, Raj (Hrsg.): Capital Budgeting under Uncertainty, 1991, S. 187–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilka, M.: Realoptionen: Optionspreistheoretische Ansätze bei Investitionsentscheidungen unter Unsicherheit, Frankfurt a.M. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klammer, T. P. / Walker, M. C.: The Continuing Increase in the Use of Sophisticated Capital Budgeting Techniques, California Management Review, Vol. 27 (1984), Nr. 1, S. 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe, A. L. / Morris, P. A. / Teisberg, E. O.: When Choosing R & D Projects, Go with Long Shots, in: Research-Technology Management, January-February, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S.: Second Throughts on Paradigms, in: Suppe, Frederick (Hrsg.): The Structure of Scientific Theories, 1977, S. 459–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S.: Die Entstehung des Neuen. Studien zur Struktur der Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 4. Auflage, Frankfurt a.M. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S.: Die Struktur der wissenschaftlichen Revolution, Frankfurt a.M. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilaka, N. / Trigeorgis, L.: The General Flexibility to Switch: Real Options Revisited, International Journal of Finance, Vol. 6 (1994), Nr. 2, S. 778–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander, D. M. / Pinches, G. E.: Challenges to the Practical Implementation of Modeling and Valuing Real Options, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 38 (1998), Special Issue, Real Options: Developments and Concepts, S. 537–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, T. J. / MacGuire, E.: Information Systems and Diffusion, Hershey 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Majd, S./ Pindyck, R.S.: Time to Build, Option Value, and Investment Decisions, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 18 (1987), Nr. 1, S. 7–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. / Siegel, D.: Investment and the Valuation of Firms When There Is and Option to Shut Down, International Economic Review, Vol. 26 (1985), Nr. 2, S. 331–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. / Siegel, D.: The Value of Waiting to Invest, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 101 (1986), Nr. 4, S. 707–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, M.K./Madey, G. R.: Adoption and Implementation of Electronic Data Interchange, in: Larsen, T. J.; McGuire, E.G. (Hrsg.): Information Systems and Diffusion, S. 116-140

  • Meise, F.: Realoptionen als Investitionskalkühl, Oldenbourg 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, A. /Varadarajan, R.: A Model of Marketing Knowledge Use within Firms, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56 Nr. 4, S. 53-71.

  • Merton, R. C.: Applications of Option-Pricing Theory: Twenty-Five Years Later, American Economic Review, Vol. 88 (1998), Nr. 3, S. 343–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. C.: Determinants of Corporate Borrowing, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 5 (1977), Nr. 2, S. 147–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S.C./ Majd, S.: Abandonement Value and Project Life, Advances in Futures and Options Research Vol. 4, (1990), S. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. C.: Fischer Black’s Contribution to Corporate Finance, Financial Management, Vol. 25 (1996), Nr. 4, S. 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuhauser, J. J. / Viscione, J. A.: How Managers Feel about Advanced Capital Budgeting Methods, Management Review, Vol. 62 (1973), Nr. 11, S. 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, N.A.: Scientific Management at Merck, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 72 (1994), Nr. 1, S. 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paddock, J. / Siegel, D. / Smith, J.: Option Valuation of Claims on Real Assets: The Case of Offshore Petroleum Leases, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 53 (1988), Nr. 3, S. 479–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L. D.: Requisite Decision Modelling, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 33 (1982), Nr. 4, S. 303–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L.D.: A Theory of Requisite Decision Models, Acta Psychologica, Vol. 56 (1984), S. 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S.: Irreversible Investment, Capacity Choice, and the Value of the Firm, American Economic Review, Vol. 78 (1988), Nr. 5, S. 969–985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premkumar, G. / Roberts, M.: Adoption of New Information Technologies in Rural Small Business, OMEGA, Vol. 27 (1999), Nr. 4, S. 467–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, M. B. / Conger, S. A.: Information Technology Innovations: A Classification by IT Locus of Impact and Research Approach, The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 26 (1995), Nr. 2&3, Special Double Issue, Diffusion of Technological Innovation, S. 20–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritsch, G.: Realoptionen als Controlling- Instrument. Das Beispiel pharmazeutische Forschung und Entwicklung, Wiesbaden 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, I.: Financial Analysis of Licensing Opportunities, Drug News & Perspectives, Vol. 8 (1995), Nr. 8, S. 509–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M.: Diffusion of Innovations, New York 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, M. J. / Jucker, J. V.: Capital Expenditure Decision Making: Some Tools and Trends, Interfaces, Vol. 9 (1979), Nr. 2, S. 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothkopf, M.: Editorial: Modeling as Aids to Thought, Interfaces, Vol. 26 (1996), Nr. 6, S. 64–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäffer, U.: Controlling für selbstabstimmende Gruppen?, Wiesbaden 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, P. / Keelin, T.: How Smithkline Beecham Makes Better Resource-Allocation Decisions, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76 (1998), Nr. 2, S. 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A.: Administrative Behavior, 2. Auflage, New York 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S.F. / Reddy, V.K./ Zwirlein, T.: Evaluating Strategic Investments, in: Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 27 (1998), Nr. 5, S. 447–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.E. / McCardle, K.F.: Options in the Real World: Lessons learned in Evaluating Oil and Gas Investments, in: Operations Research, Vol. 47 (1999), Nr. 1, S. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: Hauptströmungen der Gegenwartsphilosophie, 5Band 3, 8. Auflage, Stuttgart 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis, L.: Real Options in Capital Investment: Models, Strategies, and Applications, Westport 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis, L.: Real Options: Managerial Flexibility in Resource Allocation, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis, L.: A Conceptual Options Framework For Capital Budgeting, Advances in Futures and Options Research, Vol. 3 (1988), S. 145–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis, L.: A Real Options Application in Natural Resource Investments, Advances in Futures and Options Research, Vol. 4 (1990), S. 153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis, L. / Mason, S.P.: Valuing Managerial Flexibility, Midland Corporate Finance Journal, Vol. 5 (1987), Nr. 1, S. 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hayek, F.A.: Die Theorie komplexer Systeme, Tübingen 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, J. R. / Van Dijk, J. / Jobing, M. / Seeley, D. / Macri, R.: The SIMView Graphical Simulator for Participatory Decision Support: Evoking Systems Wisdom, in: Larsen, T. J.; McGuire, E. G. (Hrsg.): Information Systems and Diffusion, 1998, S. 88–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J.: Einführung in das Controlling, 9. Aufl., Stuttgart 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. / Schäffer, U.: Sicherstellung der Rationalität von Führung als Aufgabe des Controlling? In: DBW, 59. Jg. (1999), S. 731–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. / Schäffer, U. / Bauer, M.: Controller & Manager im Team, Vallendar 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. / Schäffer, U. / Langenbach, W.: Gedanken zur Rationalitätskonzeption des Controlling, Forschungspapier, Nr. 70, WHU Koblenz 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, R. A.: Organizational Innovation: Review. Critique, and Suggested Research Directions, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 31 (1994), Nr. 3, S. 405–431.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. McKinsey & Company, 55 East 52 Street, New York, NY, 10055, USA

    Gunnar Pritsch M.B.A.

  2. Inhaber des Lehrstuhls für Controlling und Telekommunikation, Stiftungslehrstuhl der Deutschen Telekom AG, WHU — Otto-Beisheim-Hochschule, Burgplatz 2, 56179, Vallendar, Deutschland

    Jürgen Weber

Authors
  1. Gunnar Pritsch M.B.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jürgen Weber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gunnar Pritsch M.B.A..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pritsch, G., Weber, J. Die Bedeutung des Realoptionsansatzes aus Controllingsicht. Z Control Manag 48 (Suppl 1), 72–85 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03255758

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03255758

Search

Navigation