Skip to main content
Log in

The implications of potential boundaries and definitions for understanding American Jewry: Can one size fit all?

  • Article
  • Published:
Contemporary Jewry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper utilizes data from the 2000–2001 National Jewish Population Survey to explore (1) the extent that alternate Jewish population boundaries and related concepts impact on interpretations of American Jewry and (2) tradeoffs between population size, population characteristics, and the potential dynamics of population change based on defining the population more or less broadly. The focus is on how alternative boundaries and definitions impact not only on population size, but intermarriage and Jewish child raising propensities for individuals passing through the childbearing years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alba, Richard. 2006. “On the Sociological Significance of the American Jewish Experience: Boundary Blurring, Assimilation, and Pluralism.”Sociology of Religion 67:347–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • BershtelSara and AllengnGraubard.1992.itSaving Remnants: Feeling Jewish in America. Berkeley, CA: The Free Press.

  • Breslauer, Daniel S. 2001.Creating a Judaism without Religion. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiswick, Barry R. 2002. “American Jewry: An Economic Perspective and Research Agenda.”Contemporary Jewry 23:156–182. Chiswick, Carmel. 1998. “The Economics of Contemporary American Jewish Family Life.”Studies in Contemporary Jewry 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Steven. 2001. “Response to Charles Liebman’s ‘Some Research Proposals for the Study of American Jews’”.Contemporary Jewry 22:115–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Lynn. 1991.Tradition in a Rootless World: Women Turn to Orthodox Judaism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Pergola, Sergio. 2002. “World Jewish Population 2002. ” pp. 601–642 inAmerican Jewish Year Book 2002 vol. 102, edited by D. Singer and L. Grossman. New York: American Jewish Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, Sylvia Barack. 2004.Double or Nothing?: Jewish Families and Mixed Marriage. Lebanon, NH:Brandeis University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider, Calvin. 2002. “Social Science and the Jews: A Research Agenda”Contemporary Jewry 23:196–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, Moshe,and Harriet Hartman. 1996.Gender Equality and American Jews. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, Harriet, and Deborah Kaufman. 2006. “Decentering the Study of Jewish Identity: Opening the Dialogue with Other Religious Groups.”Sociology of Religion 67: 365–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, Samuel C. 2003–2004. “American Jews and Community: A Spectrum of Possibilities.”Contemporary Jewry 24:51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, Dawn S., and Frank L.Mott. 2006. “Secular Pay-Offs to Religious Origins: Gender Differences among American Jews.”Sociology of Religion 67:439–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieval, Hillel. 2003–2004. “Introduction: Jewish Experiences of America.”Contemporary Jewry 24:ix-xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaff, Vivian. 2006. “Defining American Jewry from Religious and Ethnic Perspectives: The Transition to Greater Heterogeneity.”Sociology of Religion 67:415–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaff, VivianZ. 1998. Broken Down by Age and Sex: Projecting the American Jewish Population.Contemporary Jewry 19:2–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaff, Vivian, and Frank L. Mott. 2005. NJPS 2000/01: A Vehicle for Exploring Social Structure and Social Dynamics in the Jewish Population.Contemporary Jewry 25:226–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler-Berkowitz, Laurence. 2006. “An Introduction to the National Jew- ish Population Survey 2000-01.”Sociology of Religion 67:387–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, Lynn Korda. 1994.Jewish Community Services to the Intermarried: Report of the Task Force on the Intermarried and Jewish Affiliation. New York, NY: Council of Jewish Federations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebman, Charles S., and Steven M. Cohen. 1990.Two Worlds of Judaism: The Israeli and American Experience. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebman, Charles S. 2001. “Some Research Proposals for the Study of American Jews.”Contemporary Jewry 22:99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linzer, Norman, David Schnall, and Jerome Chanes, editors. 1998.A Portrait of the American Jewish Community. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Bruce. 2005. “Assimilation, Transformation, and the Long Range Impact of Intermarriage.”Contemporary Jewry 25:50–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Bruce. 2006. “The Legacy of Egon Mayer in the Study of American Jewish Intermarriage.”Contemporary Jewry 26:169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarna, Jonathan D. 2004.American Judaism: A History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semans, Maureen P., and Linda Stone Fish. 2000. “Dissecting Life with a Jewish Scalpel: A Qualitative Analysis of Jewish-Centered Family Life.”Family Process 39:121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United JewishCommunities. 2003.The National Jewish Population Survey 2000-01: Strength, Challenge and Diversity in the American Jewish Population. New York, NY: The Mandell L. Berman Institute, North American Jewish Data Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waite, Linda J. 2002. “The American Jewish Family: What We Know, What We Need to Know.”Contemporary Jewry 23:35–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waxman, Chaim I. 2002. “What We Don’t Know about the Judaism of America’s Jews.”Contemporary Jewry 23:72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank L. Mott.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mott, F.L., Patel, D.B. The implications of potential boundaries and definitions for understanding American Jewry: Can one size fit all?. Cont Jewry 28, 21–57 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03020931

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03020931

Keywords

Navigation