Abstract
A factor analysis of the PRF ANDRO reveals a structure reflecting the PRF scales from which the items came. It is argued that there is little value in combining a conglomeration of items from different Personality Research Form scales as has been done with the MASCUL and FEMIN scales of the PRF ANDRO. Rather, relevant intact PRF scales should be considered as separate predictors, for example in regression equations. Alternatively, if single scales are required to represent masculinity and femininity, it is suggested that PRF dominance and nurturance, the scales from which MASCUL and FEMIN draw a plurality of their items respectively, are more suitable than the two PRF ANDRO scales. These latter scales are less internally consistent and show less convergence with other sex-role scales than PRF dominance and nurturance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Antill, J.K. & Cunningham, J.D. (1979). Self-esteem as a function of masculinity in both sexes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 783–795.
Antill, J.K. & Cunningham, J.D. (1980). The relationship of masculinity, femininity, and androgyny to self-esteem. Australian Journal of Psychology, 32, 195–207.
Antill, J.K. & Russell, G. (1980). A preliminary comparison between two forms of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Australian Psychologist, 15, 427–435.
Antill, J.K. & Russell, G. (1982). The factor structure of the BSRI: method and sample comparisons. Australian Journal of Psychology, 34, 183–193.
Bem, S.L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
Bem, S.L. (1975). Sex role adaptability: one consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634–643.
Bem, S.L. (1976). Probing the promise of androgyny. In A.G. Kaplan & J.P. Bean (eds.), Beyond Sex Role Stereotypes: Readings towards a Psychology of Androgyny. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
Berzins, S.L., Welling, M.A. & Wetter, R.E. (1977). The PRF ANDRO Scale User's Manual (Revised). Unpublished paper, University of Kentucky.
Berzins, S.L., Welling, M.A. & Wetter, R.E. (1978). A new measure of psychological androgyny based on the Personality Research Form. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 126–138.
Cattell, R.B. (1965). Factor analysis: an introduction to essentials. (I) the purpose and underlying models, (II) the role of factor analysis in research. Biometrics, 21, 190–215; 405-435.
Cunningham, J.D. & Antill, J.K. (1980). A comparison among five masculinityfemininity-androgyny instruments and two methods of scoring androgyny. Australian Psychologist, 15, 437–445.
Eagly, A.H. (1967). Involvement as a determinant of response to favorable and unfavorable information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph, 7(3, Pt 2).
Heilbrun, A.B. (1976). Measurement of masculine and feminine sex role identities as independent dimensions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 183–190.
Jackson, D. (1974). Personality Research Form Manual. Goshen, NY: Research Psychologists Press.
Jones, W.H., Chernovetz, M.E.O. & Hansson, R.O. (1978). The enigma of androgyny: differential implications for males and females? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 298–313.
Murray, H.A. (1938). Explorations in Personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Spence, J.T., Helmreich, R. & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journa] of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
John K., A., John D., C. A Critical appraisal of the PRF ANDRO scale. Current Psychological Reviews 2, 223–230 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979298
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979298