Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of two wind algorithms of ENVISAT ASAR at high wind

  • Published:
Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Two wind algorithms of ENVISAT advanced synthetic aperture radar (ASAR), i. e. CMOD4 model from the European Space Agency (ESA) and CMOD_IFR2 model from Quilfen et al., are compared in this paper. The wind direction is estimated from orientation of low and linear signatures in the ASAR imagery. The wind direction has inherently a 1801 ambiguity since only a single ASAR image is used. The 1801 ambiguity is eliminated by using the buoy data from the NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) buoys moored in the Pacific. Wind speed is obtained with the two wind algorithms using both estimated wind direction and normalized radar cross section (NRCS). The retrieved wind results agree well with the data from Quikscat. The root mean square error (RMSE) of wind direction is 2.801. The RMSEs of wind speed from CMOD4 model and CMOD_IFR2 model are 1.09 m/s and 0.60 m/s respectively. The results indicate that the CMOD_IFR2 model is slight better than CMOD4 model at high wind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alpers, W. and B. Brummer, 1994. Atmospheric boundary layer rills observed by the synthetic aperture radar aboard the ERS-1 satellite.J. Geophys. Res. 99(C6): 12 613–12 621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentamy, A., Y. Quilfen, P. Queuffeulou and A. Cavanie, 1994. Calibration of the ERS-1 scatterometer C-band mode. Tech. Rep. RSMAS p. 1:72.

  • Fetterer, F., D. Gineris and C. S. Wackerman, 1998. Validating a scatterometer wind algorithm for ERS-1 SAR.IEEE Trans. Geophys. Remote Sensing 36(2): 479–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerling, T. W., 1986. Structure of the surface wind field from the Seasat SAR.J. Geophys. Res. 91(C2): 2 308–2 320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannessen, J. A., P. W. Vachon and O. M. Johannessen, 1994. ERS-1 SAR imaging of marine boundary layer processes. ESA EOQ 46, Eur. Space Agency, p. 1–256, Paris, France.

  • Quilfen, Y. and A. Bentamy, 1994. Calibration/validation of ERS-1 scatterometer precision products. Proceedings of IGARSS'94. IEEE press, Piscataway, USA, p. 945–947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quilfen, Y., B. Chapron, T. Elfouhaily, K. Katsaros and J. Tournadre, 1998. Observation of tropical cyclones by high-resolution scatterometry.J. Geophys. Res. 103(c4): 7 767–7 786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoffelen, A. and D. L. Anderson, 1997. ERS-1 scatterometer data characteristic and wind retrieval skill. Proc. First ERS-1 Symp., Noordwijk. ESA, The Netherlands. p. 1–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valwnzuela, G. R., 1978. Theories for interaction of electromagnetic and oceanic waves: A review.Boundary Layer Meteorol. 13: 61–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hou Yijun.

Additional information

Supported by the High-Tech Research and Development Program of China (863 Program, No. 2001AA633070; 2003AA604040), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 40476015).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guiting, S., Yijun, H. & Yijun, H. Comparison of two wind algorithms of ENVISAT ASAR at high wind. Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 24, 92–96 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02842781

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02842781

Key words

Navigation