Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The economics of Frank H. Knight: An Austrian interpretation

  • Published:
Forum for Social Economics

Abstract

This paper interprets, in the modern Austrian economics perspective, Frank H. Knight's three core contributions; namely, economic methodology, theories of human action, uncertainty and entrepreneurship. Though Knight is regarded as one of the founding fathers of the Chicago School of economics, this paper argues that Knight's contributions are essentially Austrian. Influenced by William James, Henri Bergson and Max Weber, Knight's subjectivist economics can be seen as a link between Carl Menger and Ludwig von Mises in the history of Austrian subjectivism. This paper further suggests that Knight may be more appropriately located in the Austrian-German School, for the reason that the term “Austrian School” is too narrow to accommodate german influences. This paper concludes that Knight's legacies have left much to be appreciated by neoclassical mainstream economists in general and Austrian economists in particular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berger, P. and B. Berger. (1976).Sociology: A Biographical Approach. Middlesex: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. and T. Luckmann. (1966).The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, Mark. (1980).Methodology in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, Peter. (1987). “Virginia Political Economy: A View from Vienna.”Market Process. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University, 5, 2: 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1994). “Ludwig Lachmann and his Contributions to Economic Science.” Peter Boettke, Israel M. Kirzner and Mario J. Rizzo, eds.Advances in Austrian Economics. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Vol. 1, 229–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, Maria T. (2000). “Weber, Schumpeter and Knight on the Role of Entrepreneurship in Economic Development.” Paper presented at 8th Conference of the International J.A. Schumpeter Society. Manchester, UK, June 28–July 1.

  • Buchanan, James. (1968). “Knight, Frank H.” David Sills, ed.International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan Press, Vol. 7, 424–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmett, Ross B. (Spring 1999). “The Economist and the Entrepreneur: Modernist Impulses in Frank H. Knight's Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit.”History of Political Economy, 31: 29–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2001).The Chicago Tradition in Economics, 1892–1945. London: Roultedge, 8 volume set.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmett, Ross B. (2001a).Frank H. Knight: An Annotated Bibliography. www.econlib.org/library/Knight/KnightBib.htm1#/reference. August.

  • Foss, Nicholai J. (Spring 1996). “The Alternative Theories of Knight And Coase, and the Modern Theory of the Firm”.Journal of The History Of Economic Thought, 18: 76–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton. (1953). “The Methodology of Positive Economics”.Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonce, R. A. (1970). “Frank H. Knight on Social Control and the Scope and Method of Economics.”Southern Economic Journal, 38, 4: 547–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1992). “Economic Institutions and Social Constructions: A Framework for Analysis.”Acta Sociologica, 35: 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunning, P. (March 1993). “Entrepreneurists and Firmists: Knight vs. the Modern Theory of the Firm.”Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 15: 31–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1997). “The Theory of Entrepreneurship in Austrian Economics.” W. Keizer, et al., eds.Austrians in Debate. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1945). “The Use of Knowledge in the Society.”American Economic Review, 35: 519–530. Reprinted in F.A. Hayek. (1947).Individualism and Economic Order. London: Routledge, 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebert, Robert F. (1985). “Was Richard Cantillon an Austrian Economist?”Journal of Libertarian Studies, VII, 2: 269–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Albert N. Link (1982).The Entrepreneur: Mainstream Views and Radical Critiques. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbenber, Jeffrey. (2001). “Human Action: What the Archives Tell Us.” www.mises.org/ downleaded on 20 August.

  • High, Jack (1982) “Alertness and Judgement: Comment on Kirzner.” Isreal M. Kirzner, ed.Method, Process and Austrian Economics: Essays in Honour of Ludwig von Mises. Lexington, Mass: D.C. Heath, 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • High, Jack. (1990).Maximizing, Action and Market Adjustment. Philadelphia.

  • Kirzner, Israel M. (1960).The Economic Point of View. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1973).Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1979).Perception, Opportunity and Profit. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1998). “Creativity and/or Alertness: A Reconsideration of the Schumpeterian Entrepreneur.”The Review of Austrian Economics, 11, 1–2: 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Frank H. (1921).Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1935/1951).The Ethics of Competition and Other Essays. New York: Augustus M. Kelly.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1940). “What is ‘Truth’ in Economics?”Journal of Political Economy, XLVIII, 1. Reprinted inOn the History and Methods of Economics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press (1956), 151–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1947).Freedom and Reform. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1956).On the History and Methods of Economics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppl, Roger. (1994). “Lachmann on Schutz and Shackle.”Advances in Austrian Economics, 1: 289–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. (1997). “Mises and Schutz on Ideal Types.”Cultural Dynamics, 9, 1: 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, L.M. (November 1947). “Review: Knight, F.H.Freedom and Reform.”Economica, 314–317.

  • Lachmann, L.M. (November 1951). “The Science of Human Action.”Economica, 412–427. Reprinted in Walter Grinder, ed.Capital, Expectation and the Market Process. Menlo Park, CA: Institute for Humane Studies (1977), 94–111.

  • — (1970).The Legacy of Max Weber. London: Heineman.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1994). Don Lavoie, ed.Expectations and the Meaning of Institutions. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, Richard N. (1986). “Coherence and Flexibility: Social Institutions in a World of Radical Uncertainty.” I.M. Kirzner, ed.Subjectivism, Intelligibility and Economic Understanding. New York: New York University Press, 171–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Metin M. Cosgel (July 1993). “Frank Knight on Risk, Uncertainty, and the Firm: A New Interpretation.”Economic Inquiry; XXXI: 456–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, Don. (1994). “The Interpretive turn.” Peter J. Boettke, ed.The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 54–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, G.B. (1988). “Hermeneutical Integrity: A Guide for the Perplexed.”Market Process. Fairfax: VA: George Mason University, 6, 1: 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1994). “Phenomenology and Economics.” Peter J. Boettke, ed.The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, Richard B. (July 1980). “The Neoclassicalists vs. the Austrians: A Partial Reconciliation of Competing World Views.”Southern Economic Journal, 47, 1: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, J. (1977). “Frank H. Knight on Uncertainty and Rational Action.”Southern Economic Journal, 43: 1438–1452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L.V. (1949/1966).Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Chicago: Contemporary Books, 3rd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1962). “Profit and Loss.”Planning for Freedom. South Holland, Ill: Libertarian Press, 112–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Driscoll, G.P. Jr. and M.J. Rizzo. (1985).The Economics of Time and Ignorance. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagué, K. H. (1985). “How far is Vienna from Chicago? An Essay on the Methodology of Two Schools of Dogmatic Liberalism.”Kyklos, 38: 412–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prychitko, David. (1994). “Ludwig Lachmann and the Interpretative Turn in Economics.” Peter Boettke, Israel M. Kirzner and Mario J. Rizzo eds.Advances in Austrian Economics. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Vol. 1, 303–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard, Murray N. (1962/1993).Man, Economy and State. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1976). “Praxeology: The Methodology of Austrian Economics.” Edwin G. Dolan, ed.The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics. Kansas City: Sheed & Ward, Inc, 19–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. J. (1954/1972).The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, Arthur (1975): “Frank Knight's Social Economics.”History of Political Economy, 7, 3: 279–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1970).On Phenomenology and Social Relations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. (1947/1964).The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieser, Friedrich von. (1914/1967).Social Economics. New York: A.M. Kelly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Tony Fu-Lai. (June 1999). “Toward a Praxeological Theory of the Firm.”Review of Austrian Economics, 12, 1: 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of New South Wales (ADFA), New South Wales, Australia

    Tony Fu-Lai Yu

Authors
  1. Tony Fu-Lai Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The author thanks Dian Kwan for her proof reading in this essay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fu-Lai Yu, T. The economics of Frank H. Knight: An Austrian interpretation. FSSE 31, 1–23 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02779057

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02779057

Keywords

Search

Navigation