Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The production of gender among Black and White women and men: The case of household labor

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using the National Survey of Families and Households (N = 13,017; 11.09% Black, 79.99% White), we compare the household labor time of Black and White women and men, and assess the extent to which the time constraint, relative resource, and ideology explanations account for racial and gender differences in housework time. We find that although time constraint, relative resource, and ideology explanations account for some of the variation in housework time, they do not account for all of the gender and racial differences. We also find that paid work and housework trade off differently for Black men than for White men and also for women and men. Finally, a variety of relative resource, time constraint, and ideology factors are associated differently with women’s and men’s housework time. We argue that our findings lend support to the production of gender approach to understanding the division of household labor and that this approach can be used to help us understand racial differences in housework time as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, J., & Huston, T. L. (1984). Sex role orientation and division of labor early in marriage.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 330–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. C., & Baruch, G. K. (1987). Determinants of fathers’ participation in family work.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. (1992). Power attitudes and time: The domestic division of labor.Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 23, 165–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1981).A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor.Journal of Labor Economics, 3, S33-S58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, J. O., & Smith, A. D. (1981). Work and family roles: Egalitarian marriage in black and white families.Social Service Review, 55, 314–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berk, S. F. (1985).The gender factory: The apportionment of work in American households. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. (1981). The good provider role: Its rise and fall.American Psychologist, 36, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, S. L., & Johnson, M. P. (1992). Wives’ perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: The intersection of housework and ideology.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 570–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, S. L., & Lichter, D. T. (1991). Measuring the division of household labor: Gender segregation among American couples.Journal of Family Issues, 12, 91–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983).American Couples: Money, Work, Sex, New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brines, J. (1993). The exchange value of housework.Rationality and Society 5, 302–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home.American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, R. (1984). The black family: Housing alternatives in the 80’s.Journal of Black Studies, 14, 341–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumpass, L. L., & Sweet, J. A. (1989). National estimates of cohabitation.Demography, 26, 615–625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cazenave, N. A. (1979). Middle-income black fathers: An analysis of the provider role.Family Coordinator, 28, 583–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coverman, S. (1985). Explaining husbands’ participation in domestic labor.Sociological Quarterly, 26, 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVault, M. (1991).Feeding the family: The social organization of caring as gendered work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, G. (1976). Education, wage rates, and the division of labor between husband and wife.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 473–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenstermaker, S., West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1991). Gender inequality: New conceptual terrain. In R. L. Blumberg (Ed.),Gender, family, and economy: The triple overlap. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. M. (1991). The gender division of labor in two-earner marriages: Dimensions of variability and change.Journal of Family Issues, 12, 158–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geschwender, J. (1992). Ethgender, women’s waged labor, and economic mobility.Social Problems, 39, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golding, J. M. (1990). Division of Labor, strain, and depressive symptoms among Mexican americans and non-hispanic whites.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider, F. K., & Waite, L. J. (1991).New families, no families? The transformation of the American home. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gump, J. P. (1978). Reality and myth: Employment and sex role ideology in black women. In J. A. Sherman & F. L. Denmark (Eds.),Psychology of women: Future directions in research. New York: Psychological Dimensions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardesty, C., & Bokemeier, J. (1989). Finding time and making do: Distribution of household labor in nonmetropolitan marriages.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (1984).Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, Z., & Roopnarine, J. L. (1993). Division of labor and child-care in dual-earner African-American families with infants.Sex Roles 29, 571–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J., & Spitze, G. (1983).Sex stratification: Children, housework and jobs. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A. G., & Davis, J. E. (1992). Constructing gender: An exploration of Afro-American men’s conceptualization of manhood.Gender & Society, 6, 464–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A. G., & Davis, J. E. (1994). Hidden voices of Black men: The meaning, structure, and complexity of manhood.Journal of Black Studies, 21, 20–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado, A. (1989). Relating to privilege: Seduction and rejection in the subordination of white women and women of color.Signs, 14, 833–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, J., Turrisa, R., & Wan, C. K. (1990).Interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamo, Y. (1988). Determinants of household labor: Resources, power and ideology.Journal of Family Issues, 9, 177–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kamo, Y. (1991). The nonlinear effect of the number of children in the division of household labor.Sociological Perspectives, 34, 205–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamo, Y. (1994). Division of household work in the United States and Japan.Journal of Family Issues, 52, 331–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, W.P., & Nock, S. (1985). Consequences of the family work day.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 619–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maret, E., & Finlay, B. (1984). The distribution of household labor among women in dual-earner families.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 357–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen, P., & Dempster-McClain, D. I. (1987). Employed parents: Role strain, work time, and preferences for working less.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 579–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orbuch, T. L., & Custer, L. (1995). The social context of married women’s work and its impact on black husbands and white husbands.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Jenkins, M., & Crouter, A. C. (1990). Men’s provider-role attitudes: Implications for household work and marital satisfaction.Journal of Family Issues, 11, 136–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. (1985).Working wives/working husbands. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presser, H. B. (1994). Employment schedules among dual-earner spouses and the division of household labor by gender.American Sociological Review, 59, 348–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rexroat, C., & Shehan, C. (1987). The family life cycle and spouses’ time in housework.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 737–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C. E. (1987). The division of household labor.Social Forces, 65, 816–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, L. A. (1994). Material resources, family structure resources, and husbands’ housework participation: A cross national comparison.Journal of Family Issues, 15, 379–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, B. A. (1990). The distribution of household tasks: Does wife’s employment status make a difference?Journal of Family Issues, 11, 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, B. A. (1992).Women, men and time: Gender differences in paid work, housework and leisure. New York: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1993a). Does marital status make a difference? Housework among married and cohabiting men and women.Journal of Family Issues, 14, 401–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1993b). Race, ethnicity and difference: A comparison of white, black and hispanic men’s household labor time. In J. C. Hood (Ed.),Men, work and family. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberstein, L. R. (1992).Dual career marriage: A system in transition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • South, S. J., & Spitze, G. D. (1994). Housework in marital and nonmarital households.American Sociological Review, 59, 27–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitze, G. (1986). The division of task responsibility in U.S. households: Longitudinal adjustments to change.Social Forces, 64, 689–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, R., Backman, E., & Dibona, D. (1977). The division of labor among cohabiting and married couples.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staples, R. (1988). An overview of race and marital status. In H. P. McAdoo (Ed.),Black families. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudarkasa, N. (1993). Female-headed African American households: Some neglected assessment. In H. P. McAdoo (Ed.),Family ethnicity: Strength in diversity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suitor, J. J. (1991). Marital quality and satisfaction with the division of labor across the family life cycle.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, J., Bumpass, L., & Call, V. (1988).The design and content of the National Survey of Families and Households. Working paper NSFH-1, Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin—Madison.

  • Taylor, R. J., Chatters, L. M., Tucker, M. B., & Lewis, E. (1990). Developments in research on black families: A decade in review.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 993–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (1993). American housing survey for the United States in 1991. InCurrent Housing Reports (pp. 38–39). Series H150/91. Washington, DC:USOPO.

  • Wade, J. C. (1996). African American men’s gender role conflict: The significance of racial identity.Sex Roles, 34, 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender.Gender & Society, 1, 125–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1993). Power, inequality and the accomplishment of gender: An ethnomethodological view. In P. England (Ed.),Theory on gender/feminism on theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1995a). Doing difference.Gender and Society, 9, 8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1995b). Reply: (Re)doing difference.Gender and Society, 9, 506–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willie, C. V. (1981).A new look at black families (2nd ed.) Bayside, NY: General Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. N., Tolson, T. F. J., Hinton, I. D., & Kiernan, M. (1990). Flexibility and sharing of childcare duties in black families.Sex Roles, 22, 409–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zvonkovic, A. M., Greaves, K. M., Schmiege, C. J., & Hall, L. D. (1996). The marital construction of gender through work and family decisions: A qualitative analysis.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Oberlin College, King 305, 44074, Oberlin, OH

    Daphne John

  2. The University of Texas at Arlington, USA

    Beth Anne Shelton

Authors
  1. Daphne John
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Beth Anne Shelton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

John, D., Shelton, B.A. The production of gender among Black and White women and men: The case of household labor. Sex Roles 36, 171–193 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766266

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766266

Keywords

Search

Navigation