Abstract
Collusive Intra-Industry Trade in Identical Commodities. — A homogenous-goods Cournot model with two countries and two firms is analyzed. Firms may collude by monopolizing their domestic markets, but they may also engage in collusive intra-industry trade. It turns out that, though such trade is costly because of transportation costs, firms might indeed trade since this enlarges the scope of successful collusion. Hence, intra-industry trade in homogenous goods is not a reliable indicator of competition.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abreu, D. (1986). Extremal Equilibria of Oligopolistic Supergames.Journal of Economic Theory 39 (1): 191–225.
Bernhofen, D.M. (1998). Intra-Industry Trade and Strategic Interaction: Theory and Evidence.Journal of International Economics 45 (1): 77–96.
Bernheim, D.C., and M.D. Whinston (1990). Multimarket Contact and Collusive Behavior.RAND Journal of Economics 21 (1): 1–26.
Brander, J.A. (1981). Intra-Industry Trade in Identical Commodities.Journal of International Economics 11 (1): 1–14.
Brander, J.A., and P. Krugman (1983). A “Reciprocal Dumping” Model of International Trade.Journal of International Economics 15 (3–4): 313–321.
Caves, J. (1979). International Cartels and Monopolies in International Trade. In R. Dornbusch and J. A. Frenkel (eds.),International Economic Policy: Theory and Evidence. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Friedman, J. W. (1971). A Noncooperative Equilibrium for Supergames.Review of Economic Studies 38 (1): 1–12.
Fung, K. C. (1991). Collusive Intra-Industry Trade.Canadian Journal of Economics 24 (2): 391–404.
Grubel, H. G., and P. J. Lloyd (1975).Intra-Industry Trade: The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products. New York: Wiley.
Phlips, L. (1995).Competition Policy — A Game Theoretic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.