Skip to main content
Log in

Classical theory, postmodernism, and the sociology liberal arts curriculum

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents classical theory as a modernist endeavor to apprehend the phenomenon of “unity of disunity.” It presents the three ways that classical theory comes to grips with the problem of wholes and parts: the holism of Durkheim, the dialectical materialism of Marx, and the pluralism of Weber. It argues that postmodernism liquidates, rather than solves, the unity of disunity problem by treating “wholes” as mere appearances.

The article contends that postmodernism needs to be taken more seriously than it has been by sociologists but that, ultimately, the challenge presented by postmodernism validates the relevancy of classical theory. The article concludes that the postmodernist influence has diminished sociology’s relevance to real-world problems and, as a result, made the discipline less relevant for undergraduates. It calls for a revitalized sociology of sociology with the capacity to think through the trap formed by neoconservatism on the one side and the micro politics of postmodernism on the other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, Daniel. 1973.The Coming of Post-industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1976.The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1992. “Interview: Daniel Bell Looks at the Big Picture.”Boston Globe, 25 October.

  • Berman, Marshall, 1982.All That is Solid Melts into Air. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, Steven and D. Kellner, 1991.Postmodern Theory: Critical Interrogations. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFleur, Lois B. 1992. “Strengthening the Position of Sociology Within the University.”Footnotes Vol. 20, No. 9 (November).

  • Gutman, Herbert. 1977.Work, Culture & Society in Industrializing America. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David. 1989.The Condition of Postmodernity. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, J. Carroll and A. Kessler-Harris (eds.). 1989.Perspectives on American Labor History: The Problems of Synthesis. Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otten, Mike. 1992. “Strengthening the State of Sociology on Campus.”Footnotes Vol. 20, No. 9 (November).

  • Omi, Michael and H. Winant. 1986.Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1980s. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, Richard and J. Cobb. 1972.The Hidden Injuries of Class. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swingewood, Alan. 1991.A Short History of Sociological Thought (2nd Edition). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, Irving M. 1990.Ideology and the Development of Sociological Theory (4th edition). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lembcke, J.L. Classical theory, postmodernism, and the sociology liberal arts curriculum. Am Soc 24, 55–68 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691919

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691919

Keywords

Navigation