Skip to main content
Log in

Treating the drug-abusing offender

  • Articles
  • Published:
The journal of mental health administration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The association between drug abuse treatment and criminal justice control is examined in this article. A framework is presented for mental health administrators and policy-makers to examine and appreciate the use of authority derived from the criminal justice system for drug abusers involved in community treatment. In addition, an overview of relevant literature is provided to encapsulate the literature related to the drug-abusing criminal offender which is most useful for mental health administrators and policy-makers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wish ED: U.S. drug policy in the 1990s: insight from new data from arrested.The International Journal of the Addictions. In press.

  2. Eckerman WC, Bates JD, Rachal JV, et al.:Drug Usage and Arrest Charges: A Study of Drug Usage and Arrest Charges Among Arrestees in Six Metropolitan Areas of the United States. Final Report BNDD Contract No. J-70-35. Washington, DC: U.S. Depanment of Justice, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barton WI.Drug Histories of Prisoners: Survey of Inmates of State Correctional Facilities. Washington, DC: Drug Enforcement Administration, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bureau of Justice Statistics:State Prison Immate Survey 1986. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Greenburg SW, Adler F: Crime and addiction: an empirical analysis of the literature 1920–1973.Contemporary Drug Problems 1974; 3:221–270.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McGlothlin WH: Drugs and crime. In: Dupont RL, Goldstein AO, Donnell J (eds.):Handbook on Drug Abuse. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1979, pp. 357–364.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Leukefeld CG: The clinical connection: drugs and crime.The International Journal of the Addictions 1985; 25(6):621–640.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clayton RR, Tuchfeld BS: The drug-crime debate: obstacles to understanding and relationship.Journal of Drug Issues 1982; Spring: 153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gandossy RP, Williams JR, Cohen J, et al.:Drugs and Crime: A Survey and Analysis of The Literature. Washington, DC: Govemment Printing Office, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ball JC, Lawrence R, Flueck JA, et al.: Lifetime criminality of heroin addicts in the United States.Journal of Drug Issues 1982; 5:225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Inciardi JA: Heroin use and street crime.Crime and Deliquency 1979; 25:335–346.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Anglin MD: The efficacy of civil commitment in treating narcotic addiction. In: Leukefeld CG, Tims FM (eds.):Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice. Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1988, Research Monograph 86, pp. 8–34.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maddux JF: Clinical experience with civil commitment. In: Leukefeld CG, Tims FM (eds.):Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice. Washington, DC. National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1988, Research Monograph 86, pp. 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leukefeld CG:Opportunities for strengthening community corrections with coerced drug abuse treatment.Perspectives: Journal of the American Probation and Parole Association 1990; Fall: 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leukefeld CG, Tims FM: Compulsory treatment: a review of findings In: Leukefeld CG, Tims FM (eds.):Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice. Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1988, Research Monograph 86, p. 236–251.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cook LF, Weinman BA: Treatment altematives to street crime. In: Leukefeld CG, Tims FM (eds.):Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice. Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1988, Research Monograph 86, pp. 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gerstein DR, Harwood HJ (eds.):Treating Drug Problems. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science Press, 1990, Vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Data from the Client-Oriented Data Acquisition Process (CODAP). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1974, 1982.

  19. Hubbard RL, Marsden ME, Rachal JV, et al.:Drug Treatment: A National Study of Effectiveness. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Simpson DD, Sells SB (eds.):Opiod Addiction and Treatment: A 12-Year Follow-Up. Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger Publishing, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maninson R: What works? questions and answers about prison reform.Public Interest 1974; 35:22–54.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wexler HK, Falkin GP, Lipton DS: Outcome evaluation of a prison therapeutic community for substance abuse treatment In: Leukefeld CG, Tims FM (eds.):Drug Abuse Treatment in Prisons and Jails. Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse, Research Monograph. In press.

  23. Field G: The Cornerstone Program: a client outcome study.Federal Probation 1988; LII:303–317.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Murry D: Drug abuse treatment programs in the Federal Bureau of Prisons: initiatives for the ’90s. In: Leukefeld CG, Tims FM (eds.):Drug Abuse Treatment in Prisons and Jails. Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse, Research Monograph, In press.

  25. Peters RH, May B: Drug services in jails. In: Leukefeld CG, Tims FM (eds.):Drug Abuse Treatment in Prisons and Jails. Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse, Research Monograph. In press.

  26. Magura S, Rosenblum A, Joseph G: Evaluation of in-jail methadone maintenance: preliminary results. In: Leukefeld CG, Tims FM (eds.):Drug Abuse Treatment in Prisons and Jails. Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse, Research Monograph, In press.

  27. Chaiken MR:Prison Programs for Drug Involved Offenders. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Irving J, Austin J:It’s About Time: Solving America’s Prison Crowding Problem, San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Deliquency, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Austin J, Tillman R:Ranking the Nation’s Most Punitive States. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bureau of Justice Statistics:Probation and Parole 1989. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Petersilia J, Turner S:Intensive Supervision for High-Risk Probationers: Findings from Three California Experiments, R-3936-NIJ/BJA. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corp., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was presented at a Treatment Review sponsored by the National Institute on Drug Abuse on Feb. 27, 1991, in Rockville, Md.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leukefeld, C., Matthews, T. & Clayton, R. Treating the drug-abusing offender. The Journal of Mental Health Administration 19, 76–82 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521309

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521309

Keywords

Navigation