Abstract
This study explored the promotion of recycling in multi-family dwellings. An experimental design investigated four behavior change techniques: biweekly postcards giving specific feedback to each dwelling unit as to quantity and contamination of the recyclables, newsletters giving general information on recycling and the amount recycled by the city as a whole, written pledges committing households to recycle for a specified period, and volunteer coordinators who distributed information and answered questions from residents. The effectiveness of these techniques was compared against that of a control group. The findings suggest that volunteer coordinators are not an effective intervention technique in multi-family dwellings, and that feedback and commitment techniques are useful mainly for managing contamination in medium sized complexes. The data also suggest that the size of a multi-family dwelling complex significantly affects the amount of recyclables collected and the level of contamination. Smaller complexes with less than ten units recycled up to three times the amount on a per unit basis as complexes with more units. Smaller units also had fewer problems with contamination in their recyclables. Several explanations are offered for the poor participation and performance in larger complexes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Apotheker, S. (1991). Volume to weight functions: Recycling's manifest destiny.Resource Recycling, 10(11), 69–74.
Barker, R.C. & Gump, P.V. (1964).Big school, small school. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Benton C.H., & Fox, R. (1990). Commingled recycling tested in apartments.Resource Recycling, 9(6), 48–50.
Burn, S.M. (1991). Social psychology and the stimulation of recycling behavior: The block leader approach.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(8), 611–629.
Burn, S. M. & Oskamp, S. (1986). Increasing community recycling with persuasive communication and public commitment.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16(1), 29–41.
City of Ann Arbor Department of Solid Waste. (1989, September).Multi-family housing solid waste survey final report. Ann Arbor, MI.
Cook, S.W. & Berrenberg, J.L. (1981). Approaches to encouraging conservation behavior: A review and conceptual framework.Journal of Social Issues, 37(2), 73–107.
Davis, G.E. (1978). Designing for residential density. In A. Baum and Y.M. Epstein (Eds.).Human response to crowding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, Associates.
Denman, C.C. (1970). Small towns are the future of America.Congressional Record, March 16. E2025, E2026.
De Young, R. (1993). Changing behavior and making it stick: The conceptualization and management of conservation behavior.Environment and Behavior, 25(4), 485–505.
Freedman, J. (1975).Crowding and behavior. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Co.
Geller, E.S. (1989). Promoting safety belt use on a university campus: An integration of commitment and incentive strategies.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 3–19.
Hopper, J.H. & Nielsen, J.M. (1991). Recycling as altruistic behavior: Normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program.Environment and Behavior, 23(2), 195–220.
Hyde, J. (1990). An experimental apartment recycling program.Resource Recycling, 9(6), 30–32.
Kaplan, S. & Kaplan R. (Eds.). (1982).Humanscape: Environments for people. Ann Arbor, MI: Ulrich's Books, Inc.
Katzev, R.D. & Pardini, A. (1987–1988). The comparative effectiveness of reward and commitment approaches in motivating community recycling.Journal of Environmental Systems, 17, 93–113.
Magnuson, A. (1990). Apartment recycling.Garbage, 2(6), 32–35.
Pardini, A. & Katzev, R.D. (1983–1984). The effect of commitment on newspaper recycling.lournal of Environmental Systems, 13, 245–254.
Sadalla, E.K. (1978). Population size, structural differentiation, and human behavior.Environment and Behavior, 10(2), 271–291.
Seligman, C., Becker, L.J. & Darley, J.M. (1981). Encouraging residential energy conservation through feedback. In A. Baum and J.E. Singer (Eds.).Advances in environmental psychology, Vol. III: (Energy conservation: Psychological perspectives). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, Associates.
Sherrod, D.R. & Cohen, S. (1976). Density, personal control, and design. In J.R. Aiello (Ed.).Residential crowding and design. New York: Plenum.
T'Kach, M. & Schoenecker, P. (1990). Practical approaches to multifamily recycling: High rises to house boats.Biocycle, 31(10), 52–54.
U.S. EPA (1990).Characterization of municipal solid waste in the United States: 1990 update. Office of Solid Waste. Washington, DC: U.S. EPA.
Wang, T.H. & Katzev, R.D. (1990). Group commitment and resource conservation: Two field experiments on promoting recycling.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20(4), 265–275.
Wilkinson, L. (1990). Systat: The system for statistics. Evanston, IL: Systat, Inc.
Wood, J.J. (1991). The challenge of multi-family recycling.Resource Recycling, 10(6), 34–40.
Zarillo, K. (1990). Multi-family residential recycling: Testing collection systems.Resource Recycling, 9(9), 66–68.
Zimbardo, P.G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos.Nebraska Symposium of Motivation, 17, 237–307.
Zimbardo, P. & Ebbesen, E. (1969).Influencing attitudes and changing behaviors. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Young, R., Boerschig, S., Carney, S. et al. Recycling in multi-family dwellings: Increasing participation and decreasing contamination. Popul Environ 16, 253–267 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02331920
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02331920