Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Noniterative estimation and the choice of the number of factors in exploratory factor analysis

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the usual factor analysis model, this paper investigates the relationship between improper solutions and the number of factors, and discusses the properties of the noniterative estimation method of Ihara and Kano in exploratory factor analysis. The consistency of the Ihara and Kano estimator is shown to hold even for an overestimated number of factors, which provides a theoretical basis for the rare occurrence of improper solutions and for a new method of choosing the number of factors. The comparative study of their estimator and that based on maximum likelihood is carried out by a Monte Carlo experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-19, 716–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC.Psychometrika, 52, 317–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. W. (1984).An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis.Psychometrika, 49, 155–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T. W., & Rubin, H. (1956). Statistical inference in factor analysis.Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. 5, (pp. 111–150). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtoldt, H. P. (1961). An empirical study of the factor analysis stability hypthesis.Psychometrika, 26, 405–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betler, P. M., & Dijkstra, T. (1985). Efficient estimation via linearization in structural models. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.),Multivariate analysis VI (pp. 9–42), Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma, A. (1985). Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in LISREL maximum likelihood estimation.Psychometrika, 50, 229–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W. (1982). Covariance structures. In D. M. Hawkins (Ed.),Topics in applied multivariate annalysis (pp. 72–141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. B. (1944). Fundamental factors of comprehension in reading.Psychometrika, 9, 185–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmett, W. G. (1949). Factor analysis by Lawley's method of maximum likelihood.British Journal of Psychology, Statistical Section, 2, 90–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hägglund, G. (1982). Factor analysis by instrumental variables methods.Psychometrika, 47, 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakstian, A. R., & Muller, V. J. (1973). Some notes on the number of factors problem.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 8, 461–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakstian, A. R., Rogers, W. T., & Cattell, R. B. (1982). The behavior of number-of-factors rules with simulated data.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17, 193–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, H. H. (1976).Modern factor analysis (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hemmerle, W. J. (1965). Obtaining maximum-likelihood estimates of factor loadings and communalities using as easily implemented iterative computer procedure.Psychometrika, 30, 291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzinger, K. J., & Swineford, F. (1939). A study in factor analysis: The stability of a bi-factor solution.Supplementary Educational Monographs, 48, Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihara, M., & Kano, Y. (1986). A new estimator of the uniqueness in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 51, 563–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennrich, R. I. (1986). A Gauss-Newton algorithm for exploratory factor analysis.Psychometrika, 51, 277–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennrich, R. I., & Robinson, S. M. (1969). A Newton-Raphson algorithm for maximum likelihood factor analysis.Psychometrika, 34, 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1967). Some contributions to maximum likelihood factor analysis.Psychometrika, 32, 443–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1978). Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices.Psychometrika, 43, 443–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • kano, Y. (1989). A new estimation procedure usingg-inverse matrix in factor analysis.Mathematica Japonica, 34, 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kano, Y. (1990). Comparative studies of non-iterative estimators based on Ihara and Kano's method in exploratory factor analysis.Communications in Statistics, Part A, 19.

  • Kano, Y. (in press). The asymptotic distribution of a non-iterative estimator in exploratory factor analysis.Annals of Statistic.

  • Lawley, D. N. (1940). The estimation of factor loadings by the method of maximum likelihood.Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Series As,60, 64–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawley, D. N., & Maxwell, A. E. (1971).Factor analysis as a statistical method (2nd ed.). London: Butterworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. Y., & Jennrich, R. I. (1979). A study of algorithms for covariance structure analysis with specific comparisons using factor analysis.Psychometrika, 44, 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. K., & McDonald, R. P. (1975). Bayesian estimation in unrestricted factor analysis: A treatment for Heywood cases.Psychometrika, 40, 505–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, A., Olsson, U., & Rosén, M. (1966).The maximum likelihood method in factor analysis with special consideration to the problem of improper solutions (Research Report). Sweden: University of Uppsala, Institute of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, A. E. (1961). Recent trends in factor analysis.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A,124, 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niki, N. (1980). Machine generation of random numbers.Proceedings of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 27, 115–131. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto, M. (1988). Early-step estimators in least-squares factor analysis.Mathematica Japonica, 33, 565–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto, M., & Ihara, M. (1984). Partial Gauss-Newton algorithm for least-squares and maximum likelihood methods in factor analysis.Journal of the Japan Statistical Society, 14, 137–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. (1955). Estimationn and tests of significance in factor analysis.Psychometrika, 20, 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, M. (1987). Pragmatic treatment of improper solution in factor analysis.Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Part B, 39, 443–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. B., & Hocking, R. R. (1972). Wishart variate generator.Applied Statistics, 21, 341–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumura, Y., & Sato, M. (1981). On the convergence of iterative procedures in factor analysis.TRU Mathematics, 17, 159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Driel, O. P. (1978). On various causes of improper solutions in maximum likelihood factor analysis.Psychometrika, 43, 225–243.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Engineering Science, Osaka University, 560, Toyonaka, Osaka, JAPAN

    Yutaka Kano

Authors
  1. Yutaka Kano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The author would like to express his thanks to Masashi Okamoto and Masamori Ihara for helpful comments and to the editor and referees for critically reading the earlier versions and making many valuable suggestions. He also thanks Shigeo Aki for his comments on physical random numbers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kano, Y. Noniterative estimation and the choice of the number of factors in exploratory factor analysis. Psychometrika 55, 277–291 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295288

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295288

Key words

Search

Navigation