Skip to main content
Log in

Alternative power laws for ratio scaling

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To take account of the observed lack of fit of the power law near thresh-old intensities, two different modifications of the power law have been proposed by various investigators. In this paper, both of these two laws are derived as a special case of a generalized power function for ratio scaling. A method is presented for discriminating between the special laws which provides (i) a prescription for the manipulation of independent variables, and (ii) specification of theoretical curves to which empirical curves are to be compared. Maximum-likelihood estimators are derived for the exponents of the special laws under the assumption that the observed subjective ratios are log normal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ekman, G. Two generalized ratio scaling methods.J. Psychol., 1958,45, 287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ekman, G. and Sjoberg, L. Scaling.Ann. Rev. Psychol., 1965,16, 451–474.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fagot, R. F. On the psychophysical law and estimation procedures in psychophysical scaling.Psychometrika, 1963,28, 145–160.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Galanter, E. and Messick, S. The relation between category and magnitude scales of loudness.Psychol. Rev., 1961,68, 363–372.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hellman, R. P. and Zwislocki, J. Some factors affecting the estimation of loudness.J. acoust. Soc. Amer., 1961,33, 687–694.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lindgren, B.Statistical theory. New York: Macmillan, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lochner, J. P. A. and Burger, J. F. Form of the loudness function in the presence of masking noise.J. acoust. Soc. Amer., 1961.33, 1705–1707.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Luce, R. D. On the possible psychophysical laws.Psychol. Rev., 1959,66, 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mashhour, M. On fitting some curvilinear functions to experimental data. Technical Report No. 131, Psychological Laboratory, Univ. Stockholm, September, 1962.

  10. McGill, W. A. The slope of the loudness function: A puzzle. In H. Gulliksen and S. Messick (Eds.),Psychological scaling: theory and applications. New York: Wiley, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scharf, B. and Stevens, J. C. The form of the loudness function near threshold.Proc. third internat. Congr. Acoust., Stuttgart, Germany, 1959.

  12. Stevens, S. S. Tactile vibration: Dynamics of sensory intensity.J. exp. Psychol., 1959,59, 210–218.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stevens, S. S. Measurement, psychophysics, and utility. In C. W. Churchman and P. Ratoosh (Eds.),Measurement: definitions and theories. New York: Wiley, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stevens, S. S. and Galanter, E. H. Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua.J. Exp. Psychol., 1957,54, 377–411.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zwislocki, J. and Hellman, R. On the psychophysical law.J. acoust. Soc. Amer., 1960,32, 924.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant G19210 and in part by a Public Health Service Special Fellowship (No. MSP-15800), from the National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service. During the tenure of this fellowship, facilities of the Institute for Human Learning, University of California, Berkeley, were made available to me. The computing was carried out at the University of California Computer Center and the University of Oregon Statistical Laboratory and Computing Center. I have benefited appreciably from numerous discussions of this research with Manard Stewart.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fagot, R.F. Alternative power laws for ratio scaling. Psychometrika 31, 201–214 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289507

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289507

Keywords

Navigation