Skip to main content
Log in

Eine Auch Sich Selbst Missverstehende Kritik: Über das Reflexionsdefizit Formaler Explikationen

A criticism misjudging itself too. On the deficiency of reflection in formal explications

  • Discussion
  • Published:
Journal for General Philosophy of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The criticism formulated by L. B. Puntel concerning the theory of dialectic proposed by the author is rejected. Puntel's attempt at explicating predication by means of (second order) predicate logic fails: It misjudges predication being already presupposed for the possibility of predicate logic, thus belonging to the transcendental conditions of formal predicate logic, so that predication itself cannot be further explicated by means of such logic. What is in fact criticized by Puntel is something like an artefact of formalization. The unreflected application of formal logic here generates problems instead of solving them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wandschneider, D. Eine Auch Sich Selbst Missverstehende Kritik: Über das Reflexionsdefizit Formaler Explikationen. Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 27, 347–352 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02262621

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02262621

Key words

Navigation