Abstract
PURPOSE: This goal of this research was to develop and evaluate the psychometrics of a health-related quality of life scale developed to address issues related specifically to fecal incontinence, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. METHODS: The Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale is composed of a total of 29 items; these items form four scales: Lifestyle (10 items), Coping/Behavior (9 items), Depression/Self-Perception (7 items), and Embarrassment (3 items). RESULTS: Psychometric evaluation of these scales demonstrates that they are both reliable and valid. Each of the scales demonstrate stability over time (test/retest reliability) and have acceptable internal reliability (Cronbach alpha >0.70). Validity was assessed using discriminate and convergent techniques. Each of the four scales of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale was capable of discriminating between patients with fecal incontinence and patients with other gastrointestinal problems. To evaluate convergent validity, the correlation of the scales in the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale with selected subscales in the SF-36 was analyzed. The scales in the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale demonstrated significant correlations with the subscales in the SF-36. CONCLUSIONS: The psychometric evaluation of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale showed that this fecal incontinence-specific quality of life measure produces both reliable and valid measurement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
O'Keefe EA, Talley NJ, Tangalos EG, Zinsmeister AR. A bowel symptom questionnaire for the elderly. J Gerontol 1992;47:M116–21.
Shelton A, Madof R. Defining anal incontinence: establishing a uniform continence scale. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 1997;8:54–60.
Ludman L, Spitz L, Kiely EM. Social and emotional impact of faecal incontinence after surgery for anorectal abnormalities. Arch Dis Child 1994;71:194–200.
Ludman L, Spitz L. Psychosocial adjustment of children treated for anorectal anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 1995;30:495–9.
Ludman L, Spitz L. Coping strategies of children with faecal incontinence. J Pediatr Surg 1996;31:563–7.
Lunniss PJ, Kamm MA, Phillips RK. Factors affecting continence after surgery for anal fistula. Br J Surg 1994;81:1382–5.
Holschneider AM. Treatment and functional results of anorectal continence in children with imperforate anus. Acta Chir Belg 1983;82:191–204.
Fitzpatrick R. Advances in medical sociology. In: Albrecht GL, ed. Quality of life in health care. Vol 5. Greenwich: JAI Press, 1994.
Avis NE, Smith KW. Conceptual and methodological issues in selecting and developing quality of life measures. In: Fitzpatrick R, ed. Quality of life in health care. Vol 5. Greenwich: JAI Press, 1994:255–80.
Ware J, Snow K, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 health survey. Manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993.
Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989:vii,175.
Campbell DT, Overman ES, Methodology and epistemology for social science: selected papers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988:xix,609.
Cronbach L. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951;16:297–334.
Salant P, Dillman DA. How to conduct your own survey. New York: Wiley, 1994:xvi,232.
Dillman DA, Sangster RL, Tarnai J, Rockwood TH. Understanding differences in people's answers to telephone and mail surveys. In: Braverman MT, Slater JK, eds. Advances in survey research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996:110.
Rockwood TH, Sangster RL, Dillman DA. The effect of response categories on questionnaire answers: context and mode effects. Sociol Methods Res 1997;26:118–40.
Lawley DN, Maxwell AE. Factor analysis as a statistical method. 2nd ed. New York: American Elsevier, 1971:viii,153.
Kim JO, Mueller CW. Factor analysis. Statistical methods and practical issues. A Sage University paper. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1978:88.
Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:171–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Done under a contract between the University of Minnesota Clinical Outcomes Research Center and The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgery and the Minnesota Colon and Rectal Foundation.
About this article
Cite this article
Rockwood, T.H., Church, J.M., Fleshman, J.W. et al. Fecal incontinence quality of life scale. Dis Colon Rectum 43, 9–16 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237236
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237236