Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The severity and prevalence of deviant employee activity within supermarkets

  • Research Notes
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Expert ratings were used in this study to derive severity indices for a variety of types of counterproductive employee behavior. Deviant behaviors rated as most severe included taking cash, merchandise or equipment from the employer without permission and engaging in drug use on the job. Coming to work hungover from alcohol was rated as the least severe behavior. The prevalence of severe theft and counterproductivity was then explored using the admissions of a supermarket employee sample. A variety of admissions of severe counterproductive behavior were obtained, which were grouped under the five general categories of theft, theft support, time theft, counterproductivity, and other types of deviance. Major findings revealed that 35% of supermarket employees admitted to engaging in severe theft of company cash or property within the previous six months.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Food Marketing Institute (1989).Loss prevention highlights for 1989. Washington, D.C.: Institute Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, R. C., & Clark, J. P. (1983).Theft by employees. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. W., Slora, K. B., & Boye, M. W. (1990). Theft reduction through personnel selection: A control group design in the supermarket industry.Journal of Business and Psychology, 5(2), 275–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. W., & Terris, W. (1991). Personnel selection to control employee theft and counterproductivity. In J. W. Jones, B. D. Steffy, & D. W. Bray (Eds.),Applying psychology in business: The handbook for managers and human resource professionals (pp. 851–861). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • London House and the Food Marketing Institute (1991).Second annual report on employee theft in the supermarket industry: 1990 summary of findings. Paper presented at the Food Marketing Institute's Loss Prevention Conference, Tampa, FL.

  • Slora, K. B. (1989). An empirical approach to determining employee deviance base rates.Journal of Business and Psychology, 4(2), 199–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terris, W., & Jones, J. W. (1980). Attitudinal and personality correlates of theft among supermarket employees.Journal of Security Administration, 3, 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Justice. (1985).The national survey of crime severity (DOJ Publication No. NCJ-96017). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SRA/London House, 9701 Higgins Road, 60018, Rosemont, IL

    Michael W. Boye & Karen B. Slora

Authors
  1. Michael W. Boye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karen B. Slora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boye, M.W., Slora, K.B. The severity and prevalence of deviant employee activity within supermarkets. J Bus Psychol 8, 245–253 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02230388

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02230388

Keywords

Search

Navigation