Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of methods, including angled and vertical minirhizotrons, for studying root growth and distribution in a spring oat crop

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Four methods of measuring root distribution in a spring oat crop were compared: minirhizotrons installed vertically, minirhizotrons installed at an angle of 45°, core-break root counts and direct measurement of lengths of root washed from soil cores.

Minirhizotrons gave better estimates of root distribution where installed at 45° rather than vertically and could be used in the horizon between 30 cm below the soil surface and the maximum depth of rooting. We confirmed that relative root distribution at a particular growth stage can be assessed from counts of the number of roots crossing horizontal faces in core segments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bates G H 1937 Nature, London 139, 966–967.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bohm W 1974 Z. Acker-u. Pflanz. 140, 282–287.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bohm W et al. 1977 Agron. J. 69, 415–419.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bohm W 1979 Methods of Studying Root Systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 188 p.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cannell R Q et al. 1980 J. Agric. Sci. Camb 94, 345–349.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Drew M C and Saker L R 1980 Plant and Soil 55, 297–305.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ellis F B and Barnes B T 1971 Plant and Soil 35, 209–212.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ellis F B and Barnes B T 1980 Plant and Soil 55, 283–295.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gregory P J 1979 J. Exp. Bot. 30, 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marsh B a'B 1971 J. Appl. Ecol. 8, 265–267.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Newman E I 1966 J. Appl. Ecol. 3, 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sanders J L and Brown D A 1978 Agron. J. 70, 1073–1076.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tennant D 1975 J. Ecol. 63, 995–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tottman D R et al. 1979 Ann. appl. Biol. 93, 221–234.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Waddington J 1971 Can. J. Bot. 49, 1850–1852.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Welbank P Jet al. 1974 Rep. Roth. Exp. Stn. 1973, part 2, pp 26–66.

  17. Welbank P J and Williams E D 1968 J. Appl. Ecol. 5, 477–481.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bragg, P.L., Govi, G. & Cannell, R.Q. A comparison of methods, including angled and vertical minirhizotrons, for studying root growth and distribution in a spring oat crop. Plant Soil 73, 435–440 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02184322

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02184322

Key words

Navigation