Skip to main content
Log in

Optical character scanning: A discussion of efficiency and politics

  • Published:
Computers and the Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optical Character Recognition is shown to be significantly more expensive than keyboarding, using off-shore contractors, for entry of large amounts of text where high accuracy is required. Using large test samples in French and English, the paper indicates that OCR applications which require significant post-scan editing are labor intensive projects that can be accomplished more efficiently by keyboarding. Most OCR systems are still not capable of entering large amounts of text accurately enough to avoid an expensive editing step.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Alice Music McLean is manager of ARTFL scanning operations. Mark Olsen is Assistant Director of the ARTFL Project.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olsen, M., McLean, A.M. Optical character scanning: A discussion of efficiency and politics. Comput Hum 27, 121–127 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01830305

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01830305

Key Words

Navigation