Abstract
Optical Character Recognition is shown to be significantly more expensive than keyboarding, using off-shore contractors, for entry of large amounts of text where high accuracy is required. Using large test samples in French and English, the paper indicates that OCR applications which require significant post-scan editing are labor intensive projects that can be accomplished more efficiently by keyboarding. Most OCR systems are still not capable of entering large amounts of text accurately enough to avoid an expensive editing step.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Alice Music McLean is manager of ARTFL scanning operations. Mark Olsen is Assistant Director of the ARTFL Project.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Olsen, M., McLean, A.M. Optical character scanning: A discussion of efficiency and politics. Comput Hum 27, 121–127 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01830305
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01830305