Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Finding the range: Linguistic analysis and its role in computer-assisted literary study

  • Published:
Computers and the Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describes how linguistic analysis can be used to change the computer from being a generator of data that can be used to develop a critical analysis to being a tool that provides a means to explore the processes and inputs that generate different interpretations of literary works. Using Michael Gregory's Communication Linguistics model to analyze Shakespeare's Sonnet CXXX, we see how the linguistic structure of the poem allows for multiple readings of the text. The article goes on to describe how this kind of analysis can be extended by employing artificial intelligence as a means to explore the interaction between language and meaning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Colomb, Gregory and Mark Turner. “Computers, Literary Theory, and the Theory of Meaning.” InThe Future of Literary Theory. Ed. Ralph Cohen. New York: Routledge, 1989, pp. 386–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, Joel.Shakespeare's Perjured Eye: The Invention of Poetic Subjectivity in the Sonnets. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, Michael. “Generic Situation and Register: A Functional View of Communication.” InLinguistics in a Systemic Perspective. Eds. James D. Benson, Michael J. Cummings and William S. Greaves. Amsterdam studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic science. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1988, pp. 300–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, Michael.Notes on Communication Linguistics: A Framework for the Description of English Discourse. Toronto: Glendon College, York University, 1982–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K.Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Mark. “Signs, Symbols and Discourses: A New Direction for Computer-Aided Literature Studies.” This issue.

  • Pequigney, Joseph.Such is My Love: A Study of Shakespeare's Sonnets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, William.Shakespeare's Sonnets. Ed. Stephen Booth. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of English, York University, M3J 1P3, North York, Ontario, Canada

    Stephen Naoyuki Matsuba

Authors
  1. Stephen Naoyuki Matsuba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Stephen N. Matsuba is currently completing his doctorate in English at York University, Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matsuba, S.N. Finding the range: Linguistic analysis and its role in computer-assisted literary study. Comput Hum 27, 331–340 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01829383

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01829383

Key words

Search

Navigation