Skip to main content
Log in

Gender differences in the perception of sexuality: Methodological considerations

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study of gender differences in the perception of sexuality was designed to systematically vary verbal and nonverbal videotaped cues of a conversation between a male-female dyad. Comparisons were made between 78 males and 99 females who were primarily Caucasian and enrolled in general psychology courses. Participants were able to either see and hear, to only see, or to only hear the same interaction. In the see and hear condition, there were no gender differences in the perception of sexuality; in the see only condition, females rated the actress lower in sexuality; and in the hear only condition, males rated the actress higher in sexuality. Results indicate that methodological differences may account for contradictory findings in prior studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females' friendliness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42 830–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbey, A. (1987). Misperceptions of friendly behavior as sexual interest: A survey of naturally occurring incidents.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11 173–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbey, A., Cozzarelli, C., McLaughlin, K., & Harnish, R. J. 1987). The effects of clothing and dyad sex composition on perceptions of sexual intent: Do women and men evaluate these cues differently.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17 108–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbey, A. & Harnish, R. J. (1995). Perception of sexual intent: The role of gender, alcohol consumption, and rape supportive attitudes.Sex Roles, 32 297–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbey, A. & Melby, C. (1986). The effects of nonverbal cues on gender differences in perceptions of sexual intent.Sex Roles 5 283–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckman, P., Friesan, W., O'Sullivan, M., Diacoyanni-Tarlatzis, I., Krause, R., & Pitcarin, T. (1987). Universal and cultural differences in the judgments of facial expressions of emotion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 712–717.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, C. B. & Conger, J. C. (1995). The impact of mode of presentation on gender differences in social perception.Sex Roles, 32 169–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T., & Whyte, W. F. (1960). Intercultural communication: A guide to men of action.Human Organization 19 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnish, R. J., Abbey, A., & DeBono, K. G. (1990). Toward an understanding of “the sex game”: The effects of gender and self-monitoring on perceptions of sexuality and likability in initial interactions.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20 1333–1344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. B., Stockdale, M. S., & Saal, F. E. (1991). Persistence of men's misperceptions of friendly cues across a variety of interpersonal encounters.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15 463–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanin, E. J. (1984). Date rape: Unofficial criminals and victims.Victimology, 9 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R. E. (1995).Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., & Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55 162–170.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lottes, I. L. (1991). The relationship between nontraditional gender roles and sexual coercion.Journal of Psychology and Human-Sexuality, 4 89–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., & Heslin, R. (1982). Perceptions of cross-sex and same-sex nonreciprocal touch: Is it better to give than to receive?Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 6 148–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumato, D., & Kudoh, T. (1987). Cultural similarities and differences in the semantic dimensions of body postures.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11 171–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppen, P. J., & Segal, N. J. (1988). The influence of sex and sex role orientation on sexual coercion.Sex Roles, 19 689–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quackenbush, R. L. (1987). Sex roles and social perception.Human Relations, 40 659–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Z. (1970). Measurement of romantic love.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16 265–273.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saal, F. E., Johnson, C. B., & Weber, N. (1989). Friendly or sexy? It may depend on whom you ask.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13 263–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotland, R. L., & Craig, J. M. (1988). Can men and women differentiate between friendly and sexually interested behavior?Social Psychology Quarterly, 51 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigal, J., Gibbs, M., Adams, B., & Derfler, R. (1988). The effect of romantic and nonromantic films on perception of female friendly and seductive behavior.Sex Roles, 19 545–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struckman-Johnson, C. (1988). Forced sex on dates: It happens to men, too.Journal of Sex Research.24 234–241.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tomich, P.L., Schuster, P.M. Gender differences in the perception of sexuality: Methodological considerations. Sex Roles 34, 865–874 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544320

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544320

Keywords

Navigation