Skip to main content
Log in

Area-averaged vegetative cover fraction estimated from satellite data

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Biometeorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship was analysed between the vegetation cover factor expressed as a percentage and the area-averaged normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). On selected days the NDVI was calculated from channel 1 and 2 reflectance data of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA—11) satellite's advanced very high-resolution radiometer (AVHRR) for five test areas under agricultural and forestry use. No ground-based reflectance measurements could be made for validation of these data. Therefore the land surface NDVI, which varied with time, and percentage vegetation cover of the test areas were deduced from time-independent but site-specific statistical land use data updated by temporal phenological observations, and from surface-specific reflectance curves published in the literature. The result indicated that the area-averaged NDVI, as obtained from the NOAA—11 radiometer, was less than the value calculated from the land surface NDVI. After correction to reduce the offset of the data, the values would be a suitable indicator of the fraction of vegetation cover.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blümel K, Bolle H-J, Eckardt M, Lesch L, Tonn W (1988) Der Vegetationsindex für Mitteleuropa 1983–1985 (The vegetation index for Central Europe 1983–1985). Institut für Meteorologie, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolle H-J, Katergiannakis U, Tonn W (1991) Der Vegetationsindex 1989 für Mitteleuropa anhand zweier ausgewählter Beispiele (The vegetation index of 1989 for Central Europe on the basis of two selected examples). Wetter und Leben 43:115–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker DE, Davis RE, Jones WT, Myrick DI, Stacy K (1985) Spectral reflectances of natural targets for use in remote sensing studies. NASA Reference Publication 1139, Washington

  • Buschmann C, Stützel M (1993) Private communication

  • Carlson TN, Perry EM, Schmugge TJ (1990) Remote estimation of soil moisture availability and fractional vegetation cover for agricultural fields. Agric Forest Meteorol 52:45–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff JW (1978) Efficient prediction of ground surface temperature and moisture, with an inclusion of a layer of vegetation. J Geophys Res 83 C4:1889–1903

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansing O, Wittich K-P (1993) Verifikation des aus NOAA-11-Satellitenbilddaten abgeleiteten Vegetationsindexes für fünf Regionen Westdeutschlands (Validation of the vegetation index deduced from NOAA-11 satellite data for five regions in western Germany). DWD-intern 56, Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach

    Google Scholar 

  • Holben BN (1986) Characteristics of maximum-value composite images from temporal AVHRR data. Int J Remote Sensing 7:1417–1434

    Google Scholar 

  • Huss J (1985) Luftbildmessung und Fernerkundung in der Forst-wirtschaft (Aerial photographs and remote sensing in forestry). Wichmann, Karlsruhe

    Google Scholar 

  • Justice CO, Townshend JRG, Holben BN, Tucker CJ (1985) Analysis of the phenology of global vegetation using meteorological satellite data. Int J Remote Sensing 6:1271–1318

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadro A (1981) Untersuchung der spektralen Reflexionseigenschaften verschiedener Vegetationsbestände (Study of the spectral reflectivities of different crops). PhD Thesis, University of Freiburg

  • Kustas WP, Schmugge TJ, Humes KS, Jackson TJ, Parry R, Weltz MA, Moran MS (1993) Relationships between evaporative fraction and remotely sensed vegetation index and microwave brightness temperature for semiarid rangelands. J Appl Meteorol 32:1781–1790

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzi AO, Planton S (1994) Implementation of the ISBA parametrization scheme for land surface processes in a GCM — an annual cycle experiment. J Hydrol 155:353–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Myneni RB, Asrar G, Tanre D, Choudhury BJ (1992) Remote sensing of solar radiation absorbed and reflected by vegetated land surfaces. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing 30:302–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormsby JP, Choudhury BJ, Owe M (1987) Vegetation spatial variability and its effect on vegetation indices. Int J Remote Sensing 8:1301–1306

    Google Scholar 

  • Phulpin T, Noilhan J, Stoll M (1990) Parameters estimates of a soilvegetation model using AVHRR data. Proceedings of the 4th AVHRR data users meeting, Rothenburg, Germany, 5–8 Sept. 1989. EUMETSAT, Darmstadt, EUM P 06, pp 125–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellers PJ (1985) Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration. Int J Remote Sensing 6:1335–1372

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellers PJ (1987) Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration. II. The role of biophysics in the linearity of their interdependence. Remote Sensing Environ 21:143–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellers PJ, Berry JA, Collatz GJ, Field CB, Hall FG (1992) Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration. III. A reanalysis using improved leaf models and a new canopy integration scheme. Remote Sensing Environ 42:187–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz G (1986) Die Bedeutung der Fernerkundung in der groβräumigen phänologischen Betrachtung (The significance of remote sensing in the phenological observation of a large area). Sonderheft zum Internationalen Phänologie-Symposium an der Universität für Bodenkultur, Wien, 17–20 Sept. 1986. Arboreta Phaenologica 31, pp 111–119

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wittich, KP., Hansing, O. Area-averaged vegetative cover fraction estimated from satellite data. Int J Biometeorol 38, 209–215 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01245391

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01245391

Key words

Navigation