Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

In vitro fertilization versus reconstructive tubal surgery

  • News and Views
  • Controversies in Assisted Reproduction
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Trimbos-Kemper TCM: Reveral of sterilization in women over 40 years of age: A multicenter survey in the Netherlands. Fertil Steril 1990;53:575–577

    Google Scholar 

  2. FIVNAT 1989 et bilan general 1986–1989. Contr Fertil Sexual 1990;18:588–600

  3. Gomel V: Microsurgery in Female Infertility. Boston, Little, Brown, 1983, pp 129–134

    Google Scholar 

  4. Medical Research International, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, The American Fertility Society: In vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in the United States: 1989 results from the IVF-ET registry. Fertil Steril 1991;55:14–23

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen J: The efficiency and efficacy of IVF and GIFT. Hum Reprod 1991;6:613–618

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zouves C, Erenus M, Gomel V: Tubal ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: A role for proximal occlusion or salpingectomy after failed distal tubal surgery? Fertil Steril 1991;56:691–695

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gomel V, Taylor PJ: Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy in Gynaecologic Practice. Chicago, Year Book Medical, 1986, pp 77–79

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gomel V: Laparoscopic tubal surgery in infertility. Obstet Gynecol 1975;46:47–48

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gomel V: Salpingo-ovariolysis by laparoscopy in infertility. Fertil Steril 1983;340:607–610

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bruhat MA, Mage G, Manhes H, Soualhat C,et al. Laparoscopy procedures to promote fertility: Ovariolysis and salpingolysis results of 93 selected cases. Acta Eur Fertil 1983;14:476–479

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fayez JA: An assessment of the role of operative laparoscopy in tuboplasty. Fertil Steril 1983;39:476–479

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gomel V: Microsurgery in Female Infertility. Boston, Little, Brown, 1983, pp 143–144

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dubuisson JB, Borquet deJoliniere J, Aubriot FX,et al. Terminal tuboplasties by laparoscopy: 65 consecutive cases. Fertil Steril 1990;54:401–403

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gomel V: Salpingostomy by microsurgery. Fertil Steril 1978;29:380–387

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gomel V: Microsurgery in female infertility. Boston, Little, Brown, 1983, pp 225–244

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gomel V: Salpingostomy by laparoscopy. J Reprod Med 1975;18:265–268

    Google Scholar 

  17. Daniell JF, Herbert CM: Laparoscopic salpingostomy utilizing the CO2. Fertil Steril 1984;41:558–563

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bruhat MA, Dubuisson JB, Pouly JL,et al. La Coeliochirurgie.In Encycl Med Chir Techn Chirurg Urol-Gynecol. Paris, Editions Techniques, 1989, Vol 6, p 38

    Google Scholar 

  19. McComb P, Paleoulogou A: The intussusception salpingostomy technique for the therapy of distral ovoductal occlusion at laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:443–447

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gomel V: Distal tubal occlusion. Fertil Steril 1988;49:946–948

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kerin JF, Surrey ES, Williams DB, Daykhovsky L, Grundfest WS: Falloposcopic observations of endotubal isthmic plugs as a cause of reversible obstruction and their histological characterization. J Laparoendoscop Surg 1991;1:103–110

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gomel V: Tubal reanastomosis by microsurgery. Fertil Steril 1977;28:59–65

    Google Scholar 

  23. Donnez J, Casanas-Roux F: Prognostic factors influencing the pregnancy rate after microsurgical cornual anastomosis. Fertil Steril 1986;46:1089–1092

    Google Scholar 

  24. McComb P: Microsurgical tubocornual anastomosis for occlusive cornual disease: Reproducible results without the need for tubouterine implantation. Fertil Steril 1986;46:571–577

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gomel V: Microsurgical reversal of female sterilization: A reappraisal. Fertil Steril 1980;33:587–597

    Google Scholar 

  26. Winston RML: Reversal of sterilization. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1980;23:1261–1268

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xue P, Fa Y-Y: Microsurgical reversal of female sterilization. J Reprod Med 1989;34:451–455

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia University and Grace Hospitals, Vancouver, B.C., Canada

    Victor Gomel

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, B.C., Canada

    Patrick J. Taylor

Authors
  1. Victor Gomel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patrick J. Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The opinions presented in this column are those of its author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the journal and its editors, publisher, and advertisers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gomel, V., Taylor, P.J. In vitro fertilization versus reconstructive tubal surgery. J Assist Reprod Genet 9, 306–309 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01203949

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01203949

Search

Navigation