Skip to main content
Log in

The protection of invertebrates, fish, and vascular plants against inorganic mercury poisoning by sulfur and selenium derivatives

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protection of organisms against mercury (Hg) poisoning is most commonly associated with the antagonistic effects of selenium (Se)-compounds against mercury alkyls in higher animals. This study shows that there is no consistent difference among Periodic Group VIA derivatives including S(IV), S(II) organic, Se (IV), Se (II) organic, possibly Se VI, as well and Te (IV) in their ability to protect against mercury poisoning. The organisms used in assays were:Coleus expiants (leaf abscission); turnip (germination); pea (growth inhibition and Hg uptake); a planarian (regeneration); the brineshrimp (excystment, phototaxy); the mealworm larvaTenebrio (metamorphosis) and the fish “tilapia” (survival, Hg uptake).

Thiamine was the most effective of the Group VIA derivatives against the widest spectrum of organisms and test systems. In planarian regeneration, it was active where S and Se compounds failed. The most unexpected observation was the hastening of insect metamorphosis by HgCl2 and the enhancement of that effect by thiamine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ben-Bassat D, Mayer A (1978) Light-induced Hg volatilization and O2 evolution in Chlorella and the effects of DCMU and methylamine. Physiol Plant 42:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Carty A, Malone S (1979) The chemistry of mercury in biological systems. In: Nriagu J (ed) The Biogeochemistry of Mercury in the Environment. Elsevier/North-Holland. Amsterdam, pp 433–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang L (1979) Pathological effects of mercury poisoning. In: Nriagu J (ed) The Biogeochemistry of Mercury in the Environment. Elsevier/North-Holland. Amsterdam, pp 519–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer R, Maynard R, Ibers J (1981) A metal ion complex of vitamin B,: The preparation and structure of Cd (thiamine) Cl3 · 6H2O. J Am Chem Soc 103:76–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer R, Maynard R, Evangelista R (1984) Synthesis and crystal and molecular structure of a Cu(I) complex of vitamin B1, Cu (thiamine) Cl2. J Am Chem Soc 106:111–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas C (1979) Potential for and implications of thiamine deficiency in northern Canadian Indian populations affected by mercury contamination. Ecol Food Nutr 8:11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganther H (1980) Interactions of vitamin E and selenium with mercury and silver. In: Levander O, Cheng L (eds) Micronutrient Interactions: Vitamins, Mineral and Hazardous Elements. Ann New York Acad Sci 355:213–225

  • Goren R, Siegel SM (1976) Mercury-induced ethylene formation and abscission inCitrus andColeus expiants. Plant Physiol 57:629–631

    Google Scholar 

  • Magos L, Webb M (1979) Synergism and antagonism in the toxicology of mercury. In: Nriagu J (ed) The Biogeochemistry of Mercury in the Environment. Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 581–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto H, Suzuki A, Morita C (1987) Preventive effect of penicillamine on the brain defect of fetal rat poisoned transplacentally with methylmercury. Life Sci 6:2321–2326

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller M, Clarkson T, (eds) (1973) Mercury, Mercurials and Mercaptans. Thomas, Springfield, p 275

    Google Scholar 

  • Okasako J, Siegel S (1980) Effect of sodium chloride and sulfur group (VIa) compounds on excystment of the brine shrimpArtemia. Water Air Soil Pollut 14:235

    Google Scholar 

  • Parizek J, Kalouskova J, Benes J, Pavlik L (1980) Interactions of selenium-mercury and selenium-selenium compounds. In: Levander O, Cheng L (eds) Micronutrient Interactions: Vitamins, Minerals and Hazardous Elements. Ann New York Acad Sci 355:347–360

  • Rothstein A (1973) Mercaptans, the biological targets for mercurials. In: Miller M, Clarkson M (eds) Mercury, Mercurials and Mercaptans. Thomas, Springfield, pp 38–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel SM, Eshleman A, Umeno I, Purnmer N, Smith CW (1973) The general and comparative biology of toxic metals and their derivatives: Mercury and lead. In: Buhler DR (ed) Proceedings of the Workshop on Mercury in the Western Environment. Continuing Education Publications, Corvallis, OR, pp 119–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel BZ, Siegel SM (1979) Biological indicators of atmospheric mercury. In: Nriagu J (ed) The Biogeochemistry of Mercury in the Environment. Elsevier/North-Holland. Amsterdam, pp 131–160

    Google Scholar 

  • -,(1987) Hawaiian volcanoes and the biogeology of mercury.US Geol Surv Prof Paper 1350, pp 827–839

  • Siegel SM, Siegel BZ, Sheldon L, Yaeger E, and Chang D (1986) Mercury antagonists: Protection of plants against vapor injury by thiamine and other sulfur and selenium compounds. Water Air Soil Pollut 27:243–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer NE, Siegel SM (1978) Effects of sulfur and selenium oxyanions on Hg-toxicity in turnip seed germination. Water Air Soil Pollut 9:423–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaeger E, Siegel BZ, Siegel SM, Lasconia M, Correa T (1986) Mercury antagonists: Loss of phototactic response in the brine shrimpArtemia and its prevention by thiamine. Water Air Soil Pollut 28:293–297

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Siegel, B.Z., Siegel, S.M., Correa, T. et al. The protection of invertebrates, fish, and vascular plants against inorganic mercury poisoning by sulfur and selenium derivatives. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 20, 241–246 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055910

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055910

Keywords

Navigation