Skip to main content
Log in

Toxicity of microencapsulated permethrin to selected nontarget aquatic invertebrates

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microencapsulated permethrin (penncapthrin) was evaluated under laboratory conditions for its toxicity toward several nontarget aquatic invertebrates. Average LC50 estimates for selected lotic invertebrates, based on a one hour dosing regime, were: 2.71 mg/L forSimulium vittatum, 4.59 mg/L forHydropsyche spp., and 13.41 mg/L forIsonychia bicolor. In acute static tests withDaphnia magna, there was no significant difference (p≤0.05) between the toxicity of penncapthrin at 96 h (LC50 range: 6.80–22.5 μg/L) and the EC formulation at 72 h (LC50 range: 0.6–21 μg/L). Comparatively, the toxicity of microencapsulated methyl parathion (penncap-m) was not significantly different from that of penncapthrin towardD. magna, the former having LC50 estimates ranging form 0.3–12.25 μg/L. LC50 estimates associated withDaphnia pulex ranged from 19 to 131 μg/L. The toxicity of penncapthrin and penncap-m towardD. pulex was difficult to determine because of frequent control mortality due to food deprivation resulting from the need to run tests for longer than 48 h. In successful tests, LC50 estimates ranged from 19 to 28 μg/L for penncapthrin and 0.08 to 25 μg/L for penncap-m after 72 h exposure. In long term toxicity tests, 95% of D. magna at 1 μg/L, 44% at 10 μg/L, and 20% at 15 μg/L survived after 39 days exposure. Less than 15% ofD. pulex survived over the same concentration range following 32 days exposure. Despite some drawbacks, long-term toxicity tests were more appropriate than short-term tests for evaluating microencapsulated sticides because of reduced variability in LC50 estimates and lower control mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott MS (1925) A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18:265–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Adema DMM (1978)Daphnia magna as a test animal in acute and chronic toxicity tests. Hydrobiologia 59:125–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali A, Marjori G, Ceretti G, D'Andrea F, Scattolin M, Ferrarese U (1985) A chironomid (Diptera: Chironomidae) midge population study and laboratory evaluation of larvicides against midges inhabiting the lagoon of Venice, Italy. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 1:63–69

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bath TD, Vandegrift AE, Hermann TS (1970) Concentration profiles downstream from instantaneous pollution loadings. J Water Pollut Contr Fed 42:582–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Braimah SA (1987) Mechanisms of filter feeding in immatureSimulium bivittatum Malloch (Diptera: Simuliidae) andIsonychia campestris (Ephemeroptera: Oligonuridae). Can J Zool 65:504–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardarelli N (1975) Concepts in controlled release: Emerging pest control technology. Chemtech 5:482–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Casida JE, Gammon DW, Glickman AH, Lawrence LJ (1983) Mechanisms of selective actions of pyrethroid insecticides. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 23:413–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels RE, Allen JD (1981) Life table evaluation of chronic exposure to a pesticide. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:485–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans ES Jr, Nelson JH, Pennington NE, Young WW (1975) Larvicidal effectiveness of a controlled-release formulation of chlorpyrifos in a woodland pool habitat. Mosq News 35:343–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanger GO (1974) What good are microcapsules? Chemtech 4:397–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney DJ (1970) Probit analysis. 3rd edition. Cambridge University Press, 333 pp

  • Fogle MV (1968) Microencapsulation promises big potential in agricultural field. Croplife, February (pp 20–22)

  • Hayat MA (1978) Introduction to biological scanning electron microscopy. University Park Press, London. 323 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • James T (1985) PARASTAT. Computerized parametric statistical package. University of Guelph, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvinen AW, Tanner DK (1982) Toxicity of selected controlled release and corresponding unformulated technical grade pesticides to the fathead minnowPimephales promelas. Environ Pollut (Series A) 27:179–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson P, Lloyd-Jones JP (1989) Drug delivery systems. Fundamentals and techniques. Ellis Horwood, New York, 282 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsbury PD, Kreutzweiser DP (1987) Permethrin treatments in Canadian forests. Part I: Impact on stream fish. Pest Sci 19:35–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladle M, Bass JAB, Jenkins WR (1972) Studies on production and food consumption by the larval Simuliidae of a chalk stream. Hydrobiologia 39:429–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis DH, Cowsar DR (1977) Principles of controlled release pesticides. In: Scher HB (ed) Controlled release pesticides. Am Chem Soc Symposium 53, Washington, DC pp 1–17

  • Luzzi LA (1970) Microencapsulation. J Pharm Sci 59:1367–1376

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JS (1978) Population dynamics ofDaphnia galeata mendotae as modified by cadmium stress. J Fish Res Board Can 35:461–469

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy JR (1983) Role of particulate organic matter in decreasing accumulation of polynuclear hydrocarbons byDaphnia magna. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 12:559–568

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meghir S (1984) Microencapsulation of insecticides by interfacial polycondensation: The benefits and problems. Pest Sci 15:265–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles JW, Woehst E (1969) Formulations for controlled release of abate in water. In: Pesticide Formulation Research: Physical and Colloidal Chemical Aspects. Adv Chem Ser #86, Am Chem Soc Washington DC, pp 183–191

  • Miles JW, Pearce GW, Woehst E (1962) Stable formulations for sustained release of DDVP. J Agric Food Chem 10:240–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Moshen ZH, Mulla MS (1981) Toxicity of blackfly larvicide formulations to some aquatic insects in the laboratory. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 26:696–703

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muirhead-Thomson RC (1977) Comparative tolerance levels of blackflies (Simulium) larvae to permethrin (NRDC 143) and temephos. Mosq News 37:172–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Muirhead-Thomson RC (1978) Lethal and behavioural impact of permethrin (NRDC 143) on selected stream macroinvertebrates. Mosq News 38:185–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulla MS, Darwezah HA (1976) Field evaluation of new mosquito larvicides and their impact on some non-target insects. Mosq News 36:251–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulla MS, Lacey LA (1976) Field evaluation of new mosquito larvicides and their impact on some non-target insects. Environ Entomol 5:283–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulla MS, Navvab-gorjrati HA, Darwezah HA (1978) Biological activity and longevity of new synthetic pyrethroids against mosquito larvae and some non-target insects. Mosq News 38:90–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Nebeker AV (1982) Evaluation of aDaphnia magna renewal lifecycle test method with silver and endosulfan. Wat Res 16:739–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson LL, Barnes WW, Harris FW, Lawson MA (1970) Evaluation of release rates of Dursban® from polyvinyl chloride formulations. J Econ Entomol 63:1870–1873

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues CS, Kaushik NK. (1984) A bioassay apparatus for the evaluation of blackfly (Diptera: Simuliidae) larvicides. Can Entomol 116:75–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues CS, Molloy CD, Kaushik NK (1983) Laboratory evaluation of microencapsulated formulations of chlorpyrifos-methyl against blackfly larvae (Diptera: Simuliidae) and selected nontarget invertebrates. Can Entomol 115:1189–1201

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharom MS, Solomon KR (1981) Adsorption-desorption, degradation and distribution of permethrin in aqueous systems. J Agric Food Chem 29:1122–1125

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley PK (1989) Impact of permethrin (emulsifiable concentrate) on the macroinvertebrate community of a headwater stream and of microencapsulated permethrin under laboratory conditions. MSc thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada, 160 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Surendar Kumar RL, Bhatnagar P (1988) Uptake of dieldrin, dimethoate, and permethrin by cyanobacteria,Anabeana sp., andAulosira fertilissima. Environ Pollut 54:55–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Berge WF (1978) BreedingDaphnia magna. Hydrobiologia 59:121–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Veith GD and Comstock VM (1975) Apparatus for continuously saturating water with hydrophobic organic chemicals. J Fish Res Board Can 32:1849–1851

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace JB, O'Hop J (1979) Fine particle suspension-feeding capabilities ofIsonychia spp. (Ephemeroptera: Siphlonuridae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 72:353–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware GW (1983) Pesticides. Theory and application. WH Freeman, New York, 308 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner RW, Farrell MP (1978) Acute and chronic toxicity of copper to four species ofDaphnia. J Fish Res Board Can 33:1685–1691

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweig G (1977) Environmental aspects of controlled release pesticide formulations. In: Scher HB (ed) Controlled Release Pesticides. Am Chem Soc Symp Series 53, Am Chem Soc Washington DC, pp 37–53

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sibley, P.K., Kaushik, N.K. Toxicity of microencapsulated permethrin to selected nontarget aquatic invertebrates. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 20, 168–176 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055901

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055901

Keywords

Navigation