Skip to main content
Log in

Replies to the critics

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Chisholm, R., 1976,Person and Object, La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, K., 1977, “Postscript” to Arthur Prior,Worlds, Times, and Selves, Amherst: University of Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, C., 1990, “Actualism, Ontological Commitment, and Possible Worlds Semantics,”Syntheses 85, 355–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, A., 1974,The Nature of Necessity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalta, E., 1988,Intensional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intentionality, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would like to thank the members of the Program Committee for the 1992 Pacific Meetings of the APA for choosing to have an author-meets-critics session on my book. And of course I would like to thank each of the critics for the time they spent reading the book and the hard work they put into their commentaries. I have found the comments to be well-balanced and insightful. I have responded to the critics in the reverse order in which they delivered their comments at the meetings. This allows me to conclude my replies with a discussion about the relationship between metaphysical foundations and set theory, a topic raised by Tony Anderson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zalta, E.N. Replies to the critics. Philos Stud 69, 231–242 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990087

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990087

Navigation