Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ethnographic boundaries: Culture, class, and sexuality in Tokyo

  • Articles
  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For those engaged in participant-observation, the first few months in the field are usually extremely difficult. By taking a reflexive turn, however, the events recorded during entrée are invaluable for revealing the social and cultural dimensions of the new life a researcher creates for him or herself. The following is an account of one researcher's attempt to enter a community in contemporary Tokyo. This account reveals the boundaries of culture, class and sexuality between the researcher and the community. The complex set of highly personal ramifications resulting from crossing those boundaries are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Befu, Harumi 1971 Japan: An Anthropological Introduction. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berreman, Gerald D. 1973 “Behind many masks: Ethnography and impression management in a Himalayan village.” Pp. 268–312 in Donald Warwick and Samuel Osherson (eds.), Comparative Research Methods. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, Laurel 1984 “Why are there no spinsters in Japan?” Journal of Family History 9:326–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crapanzano, Vincent 1977 “On the writing of ethnography.” Dialectical Anthropology 2:69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1980 Tuhami: Portrait of a Moroccan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, Arlene Kaplan 1967 “The low-caste stranger in social research.” Pp. 267–296 in Gideon Sjoberg (ed.) Ethics, Politics and Social Research. Cambridge: Schenkman.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 “Self-deception and self-discovery in fieldwork.” Qualitative Sociology 6:195–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, Robert M. 1981 “Observational field work.” Annual Review of Sociology 7:351–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford 1968 “Religion as a cultural system.” Pp. 1–46 in M. Banton (ed.), Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1973 “Deep play: Notes on the Balinese cockfight.” Pp. 412–453 in the Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamabata, Matthews M. 1983 From Household to Enterprise. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, Dorinne 1982 Work, Family and Self. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986 “Dissolution and reconstitution of self: Implications for anthropological epistemology.” Cultural Anthropology 1:74–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maines, David, William Shaffir and Allan Turowitz 1980 “Leaving the field in ethnographic research: Reflections on the entrance-exit hypothesis.” Pp. 261–281 in William Shaffir, et al. (eds.), Fieldwork Experience: Qualitative Approaches to Social Research. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morsbach, Helmut 1973 “Aspects of nonverbal communication in Japan.” The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 157:262–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1977 “The psychological importance of ritualized gift-exchange in modern Japan.” Pp. 98–113 in Annals, New York Academy of Sciences: Anthropology and the Climate of Opinion. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima, Bun 1957 Japanese Etiquette. Tokyo: Toppan Printing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakane, Chie 1970 Japanese Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnuki-Tierney, Emiko 1984 Illness and Culture in Contemporary Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollner, Melvin and Robert Emerson 1983 “The dynamics of inclusion and distance in fieldwork relations.” Pp. 235–252 in Robert Emerson (ed.), Contemporary Field Research. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, Paul 1977 Reflections on Fieldwork in Morocco. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, Shulamit 1979 On Becoming a Social Scientist. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D. K. and N. L. Farberow 1976 Suicide: Inside and out. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roadburg, Allan 1980 “Breaking relationships with research subjects: some problems and suggestions.” Pp. 281–291 in William Shaffir, et al. (eds.), Fieldwork Experience: Qualitative Approaches to Social Research. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soorifu Koohoo Shitsu 1984 Seron Choosa 16 (October).

  • Wax, Rosalie 1971 Doing Fieldwork: Warnings and Advice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Many people have read various versions of this paper, but I would especially like to thank the following for taking the time to provide me with thought provoking comments: Beverly Eliasoph, Steven Brint, Deborah Davis-Friedmann, Ezra Vogel, Robert J. Smith, Shulamit Reinharz, and Lee Rainwater. I am especially indebted to Dorinne Kondo, whose insights and warm support proved to be invaluable. Of course, all of the usual disclaimers apply.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamabata, M.M. Ethnographic boundaries: Culture, class, and sexuality in Tokyo. Qual Sociol 9, 354–371 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988464

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988464

Keywords

Navigation