Skip to main content
Log in

Representingde re beliefs

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bach, Emmon and Barbara Partee: 1980, ‘Anaphora and Semantic Structure’, in Jody Kreiman and Almerindo E. Ojeda (eds.),Pronouns and Anaphora, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Kent: 1987,Thought and Reference, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boër, Steven and William Lycan: 1980, ‘Who, Me?’,Philosophical Review 89, 427–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Gareth: 1985,Collected Papers, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Gareth: 1980, ‘Pronouns’,Linguistic Inquiry 11, 337–362, reprinted in Evans: 1985, pp. 214–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Robert: 1988, ‘Bound Variable Anaphora’, in Ruth M. Kempson (ed.)Mental Representations, Cambridge, pp. 85–104.

  • McKay, Thomas: 1988, ‘De Re andDe Se Belief’, in David Austin (ed.),Philosophical Analysis, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 207–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, Thomas: 1991a, ‘he himself: Undiscovering an Anaphor’,Linguistic Inquiry 22, 368–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, Thomas: 19916, ‘Unbound Pronouns’, manuscript.

  • Reinhart, Tanya: 1983,Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation, Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, Tanya: 1986, ‘Center and Periphery in the Grammar of Anaphora’, inStudies in the Acquisition of Anaphora, Vol. 1, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 123–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, Mark: 1983, ‘Direct Reference and Ascription of Belief’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 12, 425–452, reprinted in Salmon and Soames: 1988, pp. 169–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, Mark: 1990, Propositional Attitudes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, Nathan: 1986, ‘Reflexivity’, inNotre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27, 401–429, reprinted in Salmon and Soames: 1988, pp. 240–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, Nathan: 1991, ‘Reflections on Reflexivity’, to appear inLinguistics and Philosophy.15 (February 1992).

  • Salmon, Nathan and Scott Soames: 1988,Propositions and Attitudes, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, Scott: 1987a, ‘Direct Reference, Propositional Attitudes, and Semantic Content’,Philosophical Topics 15, 47–87, reprinted in Salmon and Soames: 1988, pp. 197–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, Scott: 1987b, ‘Substitutivity’, in J. J. Thomson (ed.)On Being and Saying: Essays for Richard Cartwright, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, Scott: 1990, ‘Pronouns and Propositional Attitudes’,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society.

  • Soames, Scott: 1991, “Attitudes and Anaphors,” manuscript.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McKay, T.J. Representingde re beliefs. Linguist Philos 14, 711–739 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00631964

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00631964

Keywords

Navigation