Abstract
Models for the description of implantation profiles in multilayer targets are compared. It is found that all analytical models have severe limitations if the different layers possess very different stopping powers. The best description of multilayer targets is obtained by a combination model using density scaling of the range and integration to account for mass conservation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J.P. Biersack, L.G. Haggmark: Nucl. Instram. Methods174, 257 (1980)
L.A. Christel, J.F. Gibbons, S. Mylroie: J. Appl. Phys.51, 6176 (1980)
H. Ishiwara, S. Furukawa, J. Yamada, M. Kawamura: InIon Implantation in Semiconductors, ed. by S. Namba (Plenum, New York 1975) p. 423
A.V.S. Satya, H.R. Palanki: InIon Implantation in Semiconductors, ed. by S. Namba (Plenum, New York 1975) p. 405
D.J. Chin, M.R. Kump, H.-G. Lee, R.W. Dutton: IEEE Trans. ED-29, 336 (1982)
R.A. Moline, A.G. Cullis: Appl. Phys. Lett.26, 551 (1975)
T. Hirao, K. Inoue, S. Takayanagi: J. Appl. Phys.50, 193 (1979)
J. Bøttiger, J.A. Davies, W.A. Grant, K.B. Winterbon: Rad. Eff.11, 133 (1971)
H. Ryssel: InIon Implantation Techniques, ed. by H. Ryssel and H. Glawischnig, Springer Ser. Electrophys.10 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 1982)
J.P. Biersack, J.F. Ziegler: InIon Implantation Techniques, ed. by H. Ryssel and H. Glawischnig, Springer Ser. Electrophys.10 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 1982)