Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of labetalol and clonidine in hypertension

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The antihypertensive effect of labetalol (L) was compared with that of clonidine (C) in a randomized cross-over study in 17 hypertensive outpatients on bendrofluazide (B). After treatment for two weeks with B (5 mg qd), either L (100 mg tid) or C (0.1 mg tid) was given and their doses were titrated at 2-weekly visits until normotension was achieved, or intolerable side-effects occurred. The treatment with B and L or C was then continued in a cross-over fashion for two 6-week periods, with 3 week diuretic washouts and subsequent dose-titration periods between the treatment periods. At the end of B, the supine blood pressure (BP) was 156/101, and at the end of B + L and B + C it was 136/91 (p<0.001) and 137/91 (p<0.001), respectively, pooling the data from both periods. At the end of B, the standing BP was 155/115, and at the end of B + L and B + C 134/100 (p<0.001) and 139/106 (p<0.001), respectively. The mean daily doses required were L 476mg and C 0.335 mg. On a weight basis, labetalol had about 1/1400 of the potency of clonidine. 12 patients complained of tiredness and dry mouth on clonidine and 2 patients of unsteadiness on labetalol. Labetalol caused a psoriasiform rash on the hands in one patient and limb weakness in one patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnett AJ, Kalowski S, Guest C (1978) Labetalol compared with prindolol plus hydrallazine in the treatment of hypertension. Med J Aust 1: 105–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Boakes AJ, Knight EJ, Prichard BNC (1971) Preliminary studies of the pharmacological effects of 5-(1-hydroxy-2-((1-methyl-3phenylprophyl)amino)-ethyl)-salicylamide (AH 5158) in man. Clin Sci 40: 18–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock KC, Heimsoth V, Merguet P, Schoenermark J (1966) Klinische und Klinisch-experimentelle Untersuchungen mit einer neuen blutdrucksenkenden Substanz: Dichlophenylaminoimidazolin. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 91: 1761–1772

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolli P, Waal-Manning HJ, Wood AJ, Simpson FO (1976) Experience with labetalol in hypertension. Br J Clin Pharmacol 3 (Suppl): 765–771

    Google Scholar 

  • Dargie HJ, Dollery CT, Daniel J (1976) Labetalol in resistent hypertension. Br J Clin Pharmacol 3 (Suppl): 751–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollery CT (1976) Closing remarks: current status of labetalol. Br J Clin Pharmacol 3 (Suppl): 823–824

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BF, Labrooy J, Munro-Faure AD (1976) Comparative antihypertensive effects of labetalol and the combination of oxprenolol and phentolamine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 3 (Suppl): 737–741

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane J, Gregg I, Richards DA (1976) A double-blind trial of labetalol. Br J Clin Pharmacol 3 (Suppl): 737–741

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornerup JJ, Pedersen EB, Christensen NJ, Pedersen A, Pedersen G (1979) Effect of oral labetalol on plasma catecholamines, renin and aldosterone in patients with severe arterial hypertension. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 16: 305–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtonen A (1979) Labetalol compared with propranolol in the treatment of hypertension: A double-blind cross-over study. Curr Ther Res 25: 378–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin LE, Hopkins R, Bland R (1976) Metabolism of labetalol by animals and man. Br J Clin Pharmacol 3 (Suppl): 695–710

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil JJ, Louis WJ (1979) A double-blind cross-over comparison of pindolol, metoprolol, atenolol and labetalol in mild to moderate hypertension. Br J Clin Pharmacol 8: 163S-166S

    Google Scholar 

  • Prichard BNC, Boakes AJ (1976) Labetalol in long term treatment of hypertension. Br J Clin Pharmacol 3 (suppl): 743–750

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugsley DJ, Armstrong BK, Nassim MA, Beilin LJ (1976) Controlled comparison of labetalol and propranolol in the management of severe hypertension. Br J Clin Pharmacol 3 (suppl): 777–782

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders GL, Davies DM, Gales GM, Rao JG, Rawlings MD, Routledge PA (1979) A comparative study of methyldopa and labetalol in the treatment of hypertension. Br J Clin Pharmacol 8: 149S-151S

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh BK, Nantel A, Goldenberg LI (1971) Antihypertensive effect of clonidine. Arch Int Med 127: 233–237

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lilja, M., Jounela, A.J. & Karppanen, H. Comparison of labetalol and clonidine in hypertension. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 21, 363–367 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00542319

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00542319

Key words

Navigation