Abstract
When clinical ethicists are called upon to give a recommendation regarding patient care, they may be faced with a dilemma of their own. If their own personal opinion is not widely shared, the ethicist will have three options. These include: (1) giving their own opinion; (2) giving the widely shared opinion; and (3) giving both opinions, leaving the physician to select which opinion to accept. The intentions of this article are to evaluate strengths and weaknesses of these three alternatives and to suggest that ethics consultants recognize and deal with this issue. Two cases are presented to explore the limitations of each option. The author suggests that when the views of ethics consultants differ from the consensus view, the consultant should give the consensus view, their own dissenting view and the arguments in support of each position.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basson MD. Bioethics in the medical center: an exploration. Hosp Pract 1984; 19:177–84.
Churchill LR, Cross AW. Moralist, technician, sophist, teacher/learner: reflections on the ethicist in the clinical setting. Theor Med 1986; 7:3–12.
Fleishman AR. A physician's view. Hastings Cent Rep 1981; (Apr):18–9.
Fowler MD. The role of the clinical ethicist. Heart Lung 1986; 15:318–9.
Freedman B. One philosopher's experience on an ethics committee. Hastings Cent Rep 1981; (Apr):20–2.
LaPuma J, Stocking CB, Silverstein M, DiMartini A, Siegler M. An ethics consultation service in a teaching hospital. JAMA 1988; 260:808–11.
Lyon-Loftus GT. What is a clinical ethicist? Theor Med 1986; 7:41–5.
Self DJ, Skeel JD. Potential roles of the medical ethicist in the clinical setting. Theor Med 1986; 7:33–9.
LaPuma J. Consultations in clinical ethics—issues and questions in 27 cases. West J Med 1987; 146:633–7.
Purtillo R. Ethics consultations in the hospital. N Engl J Med 1984; 311:983–6.
Ruddick W. Can doctors and philosophers work together? Hastings Cent Rep 1981; (Apr):12–7.
Skeel JD, Self DJ. An analysis of ethics consultation in the clinical setting. Theor Med 1989; 10:289–99.
Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language. Springfield, MA: G & C Meriam Company, 1966.
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment: Ethical, Medical and Legal Issues in Treatment Decisions. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1983.
The Council on Ethical and Judical Affairs of the American Medical Association. Current Opinions. Chicago: American Medical Association, 1989.
Ackerman TF. Conceptualizing the role of the ethics consultant: some theoretical issues. In: Fletcher JC, Quist N, Jonsen AR, eds. Ethics Consultation in Health Care. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press, 1989:47.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Edinger, W. Which opinion should a clinical ethicist give: Personal viewpoint or professional consensus?. Theor Med Bioeth 13, 23–29 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489217
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489217