Skip to main content
Log in

Quantified modal logic: Non-normal worlds and propositional attitudes

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One way to obtain a comprehensive semantics for various systems of modal logic is to use a general notion of non-normal world. In the present article, a general notion of modal system is considered together with a semantic framework provided by such a general notion of non-normal world. Methodologically, the main purpose of this paper is to provide a logical framework for the study of various modalities, notably prepositional attitudes. Some specific systems are studied together with semantics using non-normal worlds of different kinds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Barwise, Absolute Logics and 64-01, Annals of Mathematical Logic 4 (1972), pp. 309–342.

    Google Scholar 

  2. —, Axioms for Abstract Model Theory, Annals of Mathematical Logic 7 (1974), pp. 221–265.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Bell and M. Machover, A Course in Mathematical Logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. C. Chang and H. J. Keisler, Model Theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Feferman, Two Notes on Abstract Model Theory I, Fundamenta Mathematica 82 (1974), pp. 153–165.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. C. Fitting, Intuitionistic Logic: Model Theory and Forcing, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Frege, Über Sinn und Bedeutung, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik 100, pp. 25–50.

  8. P. Geach and M. Black (eds), Translations from the Writings of Gottlob Frege, Basis Blackwell, Oxford, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Hansson and P. Gärdenfors, A Guide to Intensional Semantics, in: Modality, Morality, and Other Problems of Sense and Nonsense, CWK Gleerup Bokförlag, Lund, 1973, pp. 151–167.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Hintikka, Knowledge, Belief, and Logical Consequence, Ajatus 32 (1970), pp. 32–47.

    Google Scholar 

  11. —, Impossible Possible Worlds Vindicated, Journal of Philosophical Logic 4 (1975), pp. 475–484.

    Google Scholar 

  12. —, Carnap's Heritage in Logical Semantics, in: J. Hintikka (ed.), Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1975, pp. 217–242.

    Google Scholar 

  13. —, Intentions of Intentionality and Other New Models for Modalities, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. E. Hughes and M. J. Cresswell, An Introduction to Modal Logic, Methuen and Co Ltd, London, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. J. I. Jones, Communication and Meaning: An Essay in Applied Modal Logic, Ph. D. thesis, University of Birmingham, 1977.

  16. S. A. Kripke, Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic, in: Modal and Many-Valued Logics, Acta Philosophica Fennica, vol. 16, 1963, pp. 83–94.

  17. —, Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic II, Non-Normal Propositional Calculi, in: J. W. Addison, L. Henkin, and A. Tarski (eds), The Theory of Models, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965, pp. 206–220.

    Google Scholar 

  18. —, Semantical Analysis of Intuitionistic Logic I, in: J. N. Crossley and M. A. E. Dummet (eds), Formal Systems and Recursive Functions, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965, pp. 92–130.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Leblanc, Truth-Value Semantics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. J. Lemmon, An Introduction to Modal Logic, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. Lenzen, Recent Work in Epistemic Logic, Acta Philosophica Fennica, vol. 30, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  22. L. Linsky, On Interpreting Doxastic Logic, Journal of Philosophy 65 (1968), pp. 500–502.

    Google Scholar 

  23. —, Believing and Necessity, The APA Proceedings, 50 (1977), pp. 526–538.

    Google Scholar 

  24. K. Manders, First-Order Logical Systems and Set-Theoretic Definability, forthcoming.

  25. W. V. Quine, From a Logical Point of View, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  26. V. Rantala, Impossible Worlds Semantics and Logical Omniscience, in: I. Niiniluoto et al. (eds), Intensional Logic and Natural Language, Acta Philosophica Fennica, forthcoming.

  27. N. Rescher and R. Brandom, The Logic of Inconsistency, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Routley, Welding Semantics for Weak Strict Modal Logics into the General Framework of Modal Logic Semantics, Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 23 (1977), pp. 497–510.

    Google Scholar 

  29. K. Segerberg, An Essay in Cląssicl Modąl Logic, Filosofiska Studier, no. 13, Uppsala, 1971.

  30. J. R. Shoenfield, Mathematical Logic, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. H. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  32. S. K. Thomason, Semantic Analysis of Tense Logic, Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (1972), pp. 150–158.

    Google Scholar 

  33. K. J. Wu, Hintikka and Defensibility, Ajatus 32 (1970), pp. 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rantala, V. Quantified modal logic: Non-normal worlds and propositional attitudes. Stud Logica 41, 41–65 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00373492

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00373492

Keywords

Navigation