Conclusion
To sum up. Doubts can be raised about cognitive psychoterapy. The charge of utopianism may apply in part. And a few quibbles are possible about other points. This hardly detracts from the enormous achievement of the book, which really sets a new standard for the subject, in my opinion. Brandt makes abundantly clear the importance and usefulness of trying to state issues in neutral nonmoral terminology in a way that permits them to be answered but also allows one to understand why one might be interested in the answers. He shows how psychological theory can be applied in philosophy in unsuspected ways. He greatly advances our understanding of the sorts of criticisms that actions are subject to, and therefore advances our understanding of practical reasons. He provides an excellent account of what a morality is. He raises an important issue about desire satisfaction versions of utilitarianism and presents a plausible theory concerning the measurement of a group's total happiness.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1979.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harman, G. Critical review: Richard B. Brandt, A Theory of the Good and the Right . Philos Stud 42, 119–139 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372845
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372845