Skip to main content
Log in

Studies on the organelle genomes of sugarbeet with male-fertile and male-sterile cytoplasms

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Chloroplast DNA (ctDNA) from male-fertile and cytoplasmically male-sterile (cms) sugarbeet has been investigated by restriction endonuclease digestion. Three enzymes (SalGI, BamHI and PstI) did not distinguish between the ctDNA from the two different types of plant. Another enzyme (EcoRI) revealed one variant fragment in one of the male-fertile lines examined, but this variant is not thought to be associated with the cms trait. This situation contrasts with that for mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) since it has previously been shown that mtDNA of cms sugarbeet differs considerably from that of male-fertile sugarbeet. The presently used form of cms in sugarbeet was discovered in the variety ‘US1’. Individual plants of this variety were examined to determine which types of mtDNA they contained. Some plants contained mtDNA typical of male-fertile plants and some mtDNA typical of cms plants. These results suggest that the cms trait in sugarbeet is encoded by mtDNA and not ctDNA. The small, circular DNA species previously found in mitochondria were cloned and used in hybridization experiments to determine their homologies to the other mtDNA molecules. The small DNA species showed no homology to the main band of high molecular weight DNA, but they did hybridize to molecules which were apparently their own dimers, tetramers, octamers, etc. If a small DNA species was absent from a particular sugarbeet line then no hybridization to any mtDNA of that line was detected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bedbrook JR, Kolodner R (1979) The structure of chloroplast DNA. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 30:593–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosemark NO (1979) Genetic proverty of sugarbeet in Europe. In: Zeven AC, van Harten AM (eds) Proc of Conf on Broadening Genetic Base of Crops. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp 29–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Clewell DB, Helinski DR (1970) Properties of a supercoiled deoxyribonucleic acid-protein relaxation complex and strand specificity of the relaxation event. Biochemistry 9:4428–4440

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins RA, Stohl LL, Cole MD, Lambowitz AM (1981) Characterization of a novel plasmid DNA found in mitochondria of N. crassa. Cell 24:443–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Conde MF, Pring DR, Schertz KF, Ross WM (1982) Correlation of mitochondrial DNA restriction endonuclease patterns with sterility expression in six male-sterile sorghum cytoplasms. Crop Sci 22:536–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Denhardt DT (1966) A membrane-filter technique for the detection of complementary DNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 23:641–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggleby RG (1981) A nonlinear regression program for small computers. Anal Biochem 110:9–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann RG, Bohnert H-J, Kowallik KV, Schmitt JM (1975) Size, conformation and purity of chloroplast DNA of some higher plants. Biochim Biophys Acta 378:305–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemble RJ, Bedbrook JR (1980) Low molecular weight circular and linear DNA in mitochondria from normal and male-sterile Zea mays cytoplasm. Nature 284:565–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Kool AJ, de Haas JM, van Marrewijk GAM (1982) Analysis of mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA from fertile and cytoplasmic male-sterile Petunia hybrida. In: Broertjes C (ed) Induced variability in plant breeding. Pudoc, Wageningen, p 127

    Google Scholar 

  • Laskey RA, Mills AD (1975) Quantitative film detection of 3H and 14C in polyacrylamide gels by fluorography. Eur J Biochem 56:335–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaver CJ, Gray MW (1982) Mitochondrial genome organization and expression in higher plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 33:373–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniatis T, Jeffery A, Kleid DG (1975) Nucleotide sequence of the rightward operator of phage λ. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:1184–1188

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen FV (1945) Cytoplasmically inherited male-sterility in sugarbeets. J Agric Res 71:423–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Powling A (1981) Species of small DNA molecules found in mitochondria from sugarbeet with normal and male-sterile cytoplasms. Mol Gen Genet 183:82–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Powling A (1982) Restriction endonuclease analysis of mitochondrial DNA from sugarbeet with normal and malesterile cytoplasms. Heredity 49:117–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Pring DR, Levings III CS (1978) Heterogeneity of maize cytoplasmic genomes among male-sterile cytoplasms. Genetics 89:121–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Pring DR, Conde MF, Schertz KF (1982) Organelle genome diversity in sorghum: male-sterile cytoplasms. Crop Sci 22:414–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Soberon X, Covarrubias L, Bolivar F (1980) Construction and characterization of new cloning vehicles IV-deletion derivatives of pBR322 and pBR325. Gene 9:287–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern EM (1979) Gel electrophoresis of restriction fragments. In: Wu R (ed) Methods in enzymology, vol 68: recombinant DNA. Academic Press, New York, pp 152–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Theurer JC, Mumford DL (1976) The effect of sterile cytoplasm on curly top disease resistance. J Am Soc Sugar Beet Technol 19:45–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Twigg AJ, Sherratt D (1980) Trans-complementable copynumber mutants of plasmid CdE1. Nature 283:216–218

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by R. Hagemann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Powling, A., Ellis, T.H.N. Studies on the organelle genomes of sugarbeet with male-fertile and male-sterile cytoplasms. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 65, 323–328 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00276572

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00276572

Key words

Navigation