Skip to main content
Log in

Somatic hybrids between Brassica oleracea and B. campestris: selection by the use of iodoacetamide inactivation and regeneration ability

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

An efficient procedure for obtaining somatic hybrids between B. oleracea and B. campestris has been developed. Hypocotyl protoplasts of B. oleracea were fused with mesophyll protoplasts from three different varieties of B. campestris by the polyethylene glycoldimethylsulfoxide method. The selection of somatic hybrids utilized the inactivation of B. oleracea protoplasts by iodoacetamide (IOA) and the low regeneration ability of B. campestris. The efficiency of recovery of somatic hybrids depended upon the IOA concentration, and when 15 mM IOA was used, 90% of the regenerated plants were found to be hybrid. The somatic hybrids were examined for i) leaf morphology, ii) leucine aminopeptidase (LAP) isozyme and iii) chromosome number. All the hybrids had intermediate leaf morphology and possessed LAP isozymes of both parental species. The chromosome analysis revealed a considerable variation in chromosome number of somatic hybrids, showing the occurrence of multiple fusion and chromosome loss during the culture. Some of the hybrids flowered and set seeds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arús P, Orton TJ (1983) Inheritance and linkage relationships of isozyme loci in Brassica oleracea. J Hered 74:405–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Belliard G, Vedel F, Pelletier G (1979) Mitochondrial recombination in cytoplasmic hybrids of Nicotiana tabacum by protoplast fusion. Nature 281:401–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension culture of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 50:151–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Glimelius K (1984) High growth rate and regeneration capacity of hypocotyl protoplasts in some Brassicaceae. Physiol Plant 61:38–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson MR, Rothenberg M, Boeshore ML, Nivison HT (1985) Organelle segregation and recombination following protoplast fusion: analysis of sterile cytoplasms. In: Zaitlin M et al. (eds) Biotechnology in plant science. Academic Press, London New York, pp 129–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms CT (1983) Somatic incompatibility in the development of higher plant somatic hybrids. Quart Rev Biol 58:325–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Haydu Z, Lazar G, Dudits D (1977) Increased frequency of polyethylene glycol induced protoplast fusion by dimethylsulfoxide. Plant Sci Lett 10:357–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Kameya T, Horn ME, Widholm JM (1981) Hybrid shoot formation from fused Daucus carota and D. capillifolius protoplasts. Z Pflanzenphysiol 104:459–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao KN, Michayluk MK (1975) Nutritional requirements for growth of Vinca hajastana cells and protoplasts at a very low population density in liquid media. Planta 126:105–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Medgyesy P, Fejes E, Maliga P (1985) Interspecific chloroplast recombination in a Nicotiana somatic hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:6960–6964

    Google Scholar 

  • Menczel L, Wolfe K (1984) High frequency of fusion induced in freely suspended protoplast mixtures by polyethylene glycol and dimethylsulfoxide at high pH. Plant Cell Rep 3:196–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehls R (1978) The use of metabolic inhibitors for the selection of fusion products in higher plant protoplasts. Mol Gen Genet 166:117–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishibayashi S, Kaeriyama J (1986) Structural stability of chromosomes in rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants regenerated from somatic tissue culture. Plant Tissue Culture Lett 3:31–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitch C, Nitch JP (1967) The induction of flowering in vitro in stem segment of Plambago indica L. 1. The production of vegetative buds. Planta 72:355–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitch C, Nitch JP (1969) Haploid plants from pollen grains. Science 163:85–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier G, Primard C, Vedel F, Chetrit P, Remy R, Rousselle, Renard M (1983) Intergeneric cytoplasmic hybridization in Cruciferae by protoplast fusion. Mol Gen Genet 191:244–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenck HR, Röbbelen G (1982) Somatic hybrids by fusion of protoplasts from Brassica oleracea and B. campestris. Z Pflanzenzücht 89:278–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidorov VA, Menczel L, Nagy F, Maliga P (1981) Chloroplast transfer in Nicotiana based on metabolic complementation between irradiated and iodoacetate treated protoplasts. Planta 152:341–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg E, Glimelius K (1986) A method for production of interspecific hybrids within Brassiceae via somatic hybridization, using resynthesis of Brassica napus as a model. Plant Sci 43:155–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Widholm JM (1982) Selection of protoplast fusion hybrids. In: Fujiwara A (ed) Plant tissue culture. Maruzen, Tokyo 1982, pp 609–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita Y, Shimamoto K (1986) Plant regeneration from cabbage protoplasts. In: Bajaj VPS (ed) Biotechnology of crop improvement. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo (in press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by K.Tsunewaki

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Terada, R., Yamashita, Y., Nishibayashi, S. et al. Somatic hybrids between Brassica oleracea and B. campestris: selection by the use of iodoacetamide inactivation and regeneration ability. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 73, 379–384 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262504

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262504

Key words

Navigation