Skip to main content
Log in

The compatibility of relevance and mingle

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 05 May 2010

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. A. R. Anderson and N. D. Belnap Jr.: 1975, Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Avron: 1984, ‘Relevant Entailment Semantics and Formal Systems’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 49, 334–42.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Avron: 1986, ‘On Purely Relevant Logics’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27, 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. D. Belnap, Jr.: 1980, ‘Modal and Relevance Logics: 1977’, in E. Agazzi (ed.), Modern Logic: A Survey, D. Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston, pp. 131–151.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Church: 1951, ‘The Weak Theory of Implication’, in Menne-Whilhelmy-Angsil (eds.), Kontrolliertes Denken, Untersuchungen zum Logikkalkül und der Logik der Eizel Wissenschaften, Kommissions-Verlag Karl Aber. München, pp. 22–37.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. M. Dunn: 1979, ‘R-Mingle and Beneath: Extensions of the Routley-Meyer Semantics for R’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 20, 369–376.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. K. Meyer: 1976, ‘Metacompleteness’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 17, 501–517.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. K. Meyer and M. A. McRobbie: 1982, ‘Multisets and Relevant Implication’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60, 107–139.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Routley and R. K. Meyer: 1972, ‘The Semantics of Entailment (III)’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 192–208.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Routley and R. K. Meyer: 1973, ‘The Semantics of Entailment (I)’, in H. Leblanc (ed.), Truth, Syntax and Modality, North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, pp. 199–243.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Routley and others: 1982 Relevant Logics and Their Rivals, Ridgeview, California.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Urquart: 1972, ‘Semantics for Relevant Logics’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 35, 159–169.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10992-010-9132-8.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Méndez, J.M. The compatibility of relevance and mingle. J Philos Logic 17, 279–297 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00247955

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00247955

Navigation