Abstract
It is widely believed that many of the competing accounts of scientific explanation have ramifications which are relevant to the scientific realism debate. I claim that the two issues are orthogonal. For definiteness, I consider Cartwright's argument that causal explanations secure belief in theoretical entities. In Section I, van Fraassen's anti-realism is reviewed; I argue that this anti-realism is, prima facie, consistent with a causal account of explanation. Section II reviews Cartwright's arguments. In Section III, it is argued that causal explanations do not license the sort of inferences to theoretical entities that would embarass the anti-realist. Section IV examines the epistemic commitments involved in accepting a causal explanation. Section V presents my conclusions: contra Cartwright, the anti-realist may incorporate a causal account of explanation into his vision of science in an entirely natural way.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barker P. and C. G. Shugart (eds.): 1981, After Einstein, Memphis State University Press, Memphis.
Bogen J. and J. Woodward: 1988, ‘Saving the Phenomena’, Philosophical Review 97, 303–352.
Bohr N.: 1935a, ‘Quantum Mechanics and Physical Reality’, Letter to Nature 135, 65. Reprinted in Wheeler and Zurek (1983).
Bohr N.: 1935b, ‘Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?’, Physical Review 48, 696–702. Reprinted in Wheeler and Zurek (1983).
Bohr, N.: 1949, ‘Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics’, in Schilpp (1949), pp. 200–41. Reprinted in Wheeler and Zurek (1983).
Cartwright N.: 1983, How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Cartwright N.: 1989a, Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Cartwright, N.: 1989b, ‘Capacities and Abstractions’, in Kitcher and Salmon (1989), pp. 349–356.
Churchland P. and C. Hooker (eds.): 1985, Images of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Einstein A., B. Podolski, and N. Rosen: 1935, ‘Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?’, Physical Review 47, 777–80. Reprinted in Wheeler and Zurek (1983).
Fine, A.: 1981, ‘Einstein's Critique of Quantum Theory: The Roots and Significance of EPR’, in Barker and Shugart (1981), pp. 147–58.
Fine A. and P. Machamer (eds.): 1986, PSA 1986, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Mich.
Gasiorowicz S.: 1974, Quantum Physics, Wiley and Sons, New York.
Glymour C.: 1980, Theory and Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Glymour, C.: 1984, ‘Explanation and Realism’, in Leplin (1984), pp. 173–92.
Harman G.: 1965, ‘The Inference to the Best Explanation’, Philosophical Review 74, 88–95.
Harman G.: 1968, ‘Knowledge, Inference, and Explanation’, American Philosophical Quarterly 5, 164–73.
Humphreys P.: 1989a, The Chances of Explanation, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Humphreys, P.: 1989b, ‘Scientific Explanation: The Causes, Some of the Causes, and Nothing But the Causes’, in Kitcher and Salmon (1989), pp. 283–306.
Kitcher, P.: 1989, ‘Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World’, in Kitcher and Salmon (1989), pp. 410–506.
Kitcher P. and W. C. Salmon (eds.): 1989, Scientific Explanation, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Kochen S. and E. P. Specker: 1967, ‘The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics’, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17, 59–87.
Leplin J. (ed.): 1984, Scientific Realism, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Locke J.: 1975, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, (first published in 1689) edited by P. H.Nidditch, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Mayo, D.: 1986, ‘Cartwright, Causality, and Coincidence’ in Fine and Machamer (1986).
Perrin J.: 1923, Atoms, translation of Les Atomes (1912), translated by D. L. Hammick, Van Nostrand, New York.
Railton, P.: 1989, ‘Explanation and Metaphysical Controversy’, in Kitcher and Salmon (1989), pp. 220–252.
Salmon W.: 1984, Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Salmon, W.: 1989, ‘Four Decades of Scientific Explanation’, in Kitcher and Salmon (1989), pp. 3–219.
Schilpp P. A., (ed.): 1949, Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, The Library of Living Philosophers, Evanston IL.
VanFraassen B. C.: 1980, The Scientific Image, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
VanFraassen B. C.: 1984, ‘Belief and the Will’, Journal of Philosophy 81, 235–56.
Van Fraassen, B. C.: 1985, ‘Empiricism in the Philosophy of Science’, in Churchland and Hooker (1985), pp. 245–308.
Van Fraassen B. C.: 1989, Laws and Symmetry, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Wheeler J. A. and W. H. Zurek (eds.): 1983, Quantum Theory and Measurement, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hitchcock, C.R. Causal explanation and scientific realism. Erkenntnis 37, 151–178 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209320
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209320