Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rawls and Bentham reconciled

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper deals with the characterization of a class of social welfare orderings. The social evaluation functions which represent these orderings are separable in the components of the ordered utility vector. The characterization is based on the Strong Pareto Property, Co-cardinality, Continuity and a new Independence Property. Since this class encompasses the utilitarian rule and since there are members of this family which almost coincide with the rules of rank dictatorship this family bridges the gap between pure utilitarianism and rank dictatorship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aczel, J.: 1966, Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications. Academic Press, New York, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • d'Aspremont, C. and L. Gevers: 1977, ‘Equity and the Informational Basis of Collective Choice’, Review of Economic Studies 44, 199–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G., 1960, ‘Topological Methods in Cardinal Utility Theory’, in K. J. Arrow, S. Karlin, P. Suppes (eds.), Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deschamps, R. and L. Gevers: 1978, ‘Leximin and Utilitarian Rules: A Joint Characterization’, Journal of Economic Theory 17, 143–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, U.: 1987, ‘A Note on Social Welfare Orderings’, European Economic Review 31, 1145–1147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gevers, L.: 1979, ‘On Interpersonal Comparability and Social Welfare Orderings’, Econometrica 47, 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskin, E.: 1978, ‘A Theorem on Utilitarianism’, Review of Economic Studies 45, 93–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. W. S.: 1980, ‘Interpersonal Comparability and Social Choice Theory’, Review of Economic Studies 47, 421–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.: 1974, ‘Rawls versus Bentham: An Axiomatic Examination of the Pure Distribution Problem’, Theory and Decision 4, 301–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.: 1977, ‘On Weights and Measures: Informational Constraints in Social Welfare Analysis’, Econometrica 45, 1539–1572.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, University of Bonn, Adenauerallee 24-42, 1, Bonn, FRG

    Udo Ebert

Authors
  1. Udo Ebert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ebert, U. Rawls and Bentham reconciled. Theor Decis 24, 215–223 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148955

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148955

Keywords

Search

Navigation