Skip to main content
Log in

Local interactional production of the rational practice of consumption

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Atkinson, J.M. and Heritage, J. (Eds.) (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. and Pinch, T. (1988). Micro-sociology and macro-economics: Selling by social control. In N.G. Fielding (Ed.), Action and structure: Research methods and social theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J. (1984). Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, P. (1984). Speakers' reportings in invitation sequences. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. and Isherwood, B. (1978). The world of goods: Toward an anthropology of consumption. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, N.G. (Ed.) (1988). Action and structure: Research methods and social theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1968). Discussion. In R.J. Hill and K.S. Crittenden (Eds.), Proceedings of the Purdue Symposium on Ethnomethodology. Institute Monograph Series Number 1, Institute for the Study of Social Change, Purdue University.

  • Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M. and Livingston, E. (1981). The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11:131–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R.J. and Crittenden, gnK. (Eds.) (1968). Proceedings of the Purdue Symposium on Ethnomethodology. Institute Monograph Series Number 1, Institute for the Study of Social Change, Purdue University.

  • Kitazawa, Y. (1980). A structural causality on rationality of action (Koui no ‘gourisei’ ni kansuru kouzouronteki sinborizumu). The annuals of sociology (Shakaigaku Nenshi) 21: 169–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S.C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1962). La pensée sauvage. Paris: Plon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, E.L. (1982). Technical work and critical inquiry: Investigations in a scientific laboratory. Social Studies of Science 12: 499–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. (1988). Culture and consumption: New approaches to the symbolic character of consumer goods and activities. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1968). The structure of social action. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. and Smelser, N.J. (1956). Economy and society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psathas, G. (Ed.) (1979). Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1979). Hotrodder: A revolutionary category. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A. and Jeferson, G. (1978). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. (1976). Culture and practical reason. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenkein, J. (Ed.) (1978). Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E.A. and Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica 7: 289–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1962). Collected papers I: The problem of social reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1964). Collected papers II: Studies in social theory. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1919). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. New York: B.W. Huebsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S. (1988). Science: The very idea. New York: Ellis Horwood and Tavistok.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am grateful to George Psathas for his comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kitazawa, Y. Local interactional production of the rational practice of consumption. Hum Stud 15, 145–160 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142737

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142737

Keywords

Navigation