Skip to main content
Log in

A foundation of Bayesian statistics (How to deal with fears)

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A rational statistical decision maker whose preferences satisfy Savage's axioms will minimize a Bayesian risk function: the expectation with respect to a revealed (or subjective) probability distribution of a loss (or negative utility) function over the consequences of the statistical decision problem. However, the nice expected utility form of the Bayesian risk criterion is nothing but a representation of special preferences. The subjective probability is defined together with the utility (or loss) function and it is not possible, in general, to use a given loss function - say a quadratic loss - and to elicit independently a subjective distribution.

I construct the Bayesian risk criterion with a set of five axioms, each with a simple mathematical implication. This construction clearly shows that the subjective probability that is revealed by a decider's preferences is nothing but a (Radon) measure equivalent to a linear functional (the criterion). The functions on which the criterion operates are expected utilities in the von Neumann-Morgenstern sense. It then becomes clear that the subjective distribution cannot be eliciteda priori, independently of the utility function on consequences.

However, if one considers a statistical decision problem by itself, losses, defined by a given loss function, become the consequences of the decisions. It can be imagined that experienced statisticians are used to dealing with different losses and are able to compare them (i.e. have ‘preferences’, or ‘fears’ over a set of possible losses). Using suitable axioms over these preferences, one can represent them by a (linear) criterion: this criterion is the expectation of losses with respect to a (revealed) distribution. It must be noted that such a distribution is a measure and need not be a probability distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anscombe, F. and Aumann, R.: 1963, ‘A definition of subjective probability’, Annals of Mathematical Economics,34(1), 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourbaki, N.: 1961,Espaces Vectoriels Topologiques, fascicule XV, Hermann, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G.: 1952, ‘Representation of a preference ordering by a numerical function’, inReadings in Mathematical Economics, P. Newman (ed.), John Hopkins Press, pp. 257–263.

  • Dieudonné, J.: 1972,Eléments d'Analyse, Gauthier-Villars, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellacherie, C. and Meyer, P.A.: 1975,Probabilités et Potentiels, Hermann, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J.: 1987, ‘Decision theory with moral hazard and state dependent preferences’ inEssays on Economic Decisions Under Uncertainty, Cambridge University Press.

  • Grandmont, J.M.: 1972, ‘Continuity properties of a von Neumann-Morgenstern utility’,Journal of Economic Theory, 45–57.

  • Kast, R.: 1987, ‘Rationalités et optimalités’, Thèse d'Etat, Université d'Aix-Marseille III.

  • Kast, R.: 1988, ‘A generalisation of rational behaviour’, inRisk, Decision and Rationality, B. Munier (ed.), Reidel, pp. 419–434.

  • Machina, M.: 1988, ‘Dynamic consistency and non-expected utility models of choice under uncertainty’, UC San Diego, D.P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.: 1954,The Foundation of Statistics, J. Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kast, R. A foundation of Bayesian statistics (How to deal with fears). Theor Decis 31, 175–197 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132992

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132992

Keywords

Navigation