Skip to main content
Log in

Applied demography, affirmative action and rapidly evolving case law: A comment on Siegel and Morrison

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Clark, W. A. V. & Morrison, P. A. (1995). Demographic foundations of political empowerment in multiminority cities, Demography 32(2): 183–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grofman, B. (1985). Criteria for districting: A social science perspective, UCLA Law Review 33: 77–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pildes, R. H. & Niemi, R. G. (1993) Expressive harms, “Bizarre districts” and voting rights: Evaluating election-district appearances after Shaw v. Reno, Michigan Law Review 92(3): 483–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. K. (1993) Expert testimony in adversarial legal proceeding: Some tips for demographers, Population Research and Policy Review 12: 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, H. P. (1988). Measuring the compactness of legislative districts, Legislative Studies Quarterly 8: 105–115.

    Google Scholar 

Cases cited

  • Adarand Constructors Inc. v. Pena [63 LW 4523 (1995)]

  • Miller v. Johnson [63 LW 4726 (1995)]

  • Missouri v. Jenkins [63 LW 4486 (1995)]

  • Shaw v. Reno [113 S. Ct. 2816 (1993)]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Terrie, E.W. Applied demography, affirmative action and rapidly evolving case law: A comment on Siegel and Morrison. Popul Res Policy Rev 15, 165–168 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126133

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126133

Keywords

Navigation