Skip to main content

Eight Types of Global Quasi-Legislative Behavior

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Development of Global Legislative Politics

Part of the book series: Trust ((TRUST,volume 3))

  • 199 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter shows the hexagonal profiles of sovereign states’ legislative behavior, first globally (Brazil, Sweden, Iran, New Zealand, Slovakia, South Korea, Nigeria, Uzbekistan), then regionally on Asia (Japan, China, North Korea, Indonesia, Bangladesh, South Korea and Uzbekistan). Hexagonal profiles are constructed to show the distance from world mean by six policy domains, i.e., human rights, peace and security, trade, commerce and communication, environment, intellectual property, labor, health).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Estes, R. J., & Joseph Sirgy, M. (Eds.). (2017). The pursuit of human well-being: The untold global history. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. H. (2011). Fairness and freedom: A history of two open societies, New Zealand and the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoguchi, T. (2000). Broadening the basis of social capital in Japan. In R. D. Putnam (Ed.), Democracies in flux: The evolution of social capital in contemporary society (pp. 383–384). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamau, M., et al. (2019). Transforming multilateral diplomacy: The inside story of the sustainable development goals. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. (2013). Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being (12 volumes). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment now: The case for reason, science, humanism, and progress. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. D. (1961). The level-of-analysis problem in international relations. World Politics, 14(1), 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. (2016). Intimate rivals: Japanese domestic politics and a rising China. New York: Columbia University Press, Reprint edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuenkel, O. (2016). Post-western world: How emerging powers are remaking global order. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2018, March 24–30). The world this week: Politics (p. 7).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2018). The sustainable development goals. New York: UN publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. (1959). Man, the state and war. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Inoguchi, T., Le, L.T.Q. (2020). Eight Types of Global Quasi-Legislative Behavior. In: The Development of Global Legislative Politics. Trust, vol 3. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9389-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9389-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9388-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9389-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics