Skip to main content

Syntax-Semantics Interface and the Form-Meaning Mismatch Between L1 and L2

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Universal Grammar and the Initial State of Second Language Learning

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSEDUCAT))

Abstract

While syntactic rules guide how words in a language are combined to form sentences, semantics focuses on the rules of meaning at morphological, lexical and syntactic levels. The interface between syntax and semantics, therefore, links the clausal form and its underlying meaning. However, the syntax-semantics interface is one of the most vulnerable aspects in L2 acquisition. Therefore, L2 speakers are found to either often have incomplete grammar, or have highly variable syntactic-semantic awareness and performance. In the context of SLA, previous knowledge, such as that in L1, is believed to account for the “incompleteness” in L2 syntactic and semantic acquisition. The syntax-semantics interface, therefore, poses a big challenge for both child and adult L2 learners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bauer, L. (2014). Grammaticality, acceptability, possible words and large corpora. Morphology, 24, 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belletti, A., Bennati, E., & Sorace, A. (2007). Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25, 657–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bley-Vroman, R. (2009). The evolving context of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 175–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, P. J., & Sekerina, I. (2006). Shortcuts to quantifier interpretation in children and adults. Language Acquisition, 13(3), 177–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., & Haynes, M. (1985). Literacy background and reading development in a second language. In T. H. Carr (Ed.), The development of reading skills (pp. 19–34). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, A. Y. W. (2004). Syntactic transfer: Evidence from the interlanguage of Hong Kong Chinese ESL learners. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 56–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, S., & Routledge, C. (Eds.). (2009). Key Ideas in linguistics and the philosophy of language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Hague: The Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, B. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, S. (1992). The Semantic Subset Principle in the acquisition of quantification. Paper presented at the Workshop on the Acquisition of Wh-Extraction and Related Work on Quantification, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, S. (2008). The interpretation of disjunction in universal grammar. Language and Speech, 51(1&2), 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crain, S., Ni, W., & Conway, L. (1994). Learning, parsing and modularity. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 443–467). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, S., & Philip, W. (1993). Global semantic dependencies in child language. Paper presented at the 16th GLOW Colloquium, Lund, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, S., Philip, W., Drozd, K., Roeper, T., & Matsuoka, K. (1992). Only in child language. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to research on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft, W. (2006). Typology. In M. Aronoff & J. Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 337–368). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fruit, M. (2006). L2 Acquisition of Focus Constructions in European Portuguese and the L2 Status of the Syntax-Discourse Interface. In M. G. O. Brien, C. Shea, & J. Archibald (Eds.), Proceedings to the 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2006). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, M. (1987). Processing transfer: Language-specific processing strategies as a source of interlanguage variation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 351–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, M., & Carr, T. H. (1990). Writing system background and second language reading: A component skills analysis of english reading by native speaker-readers of Chinese. In T. H. Carr & B. A. Levy (Eds.), Reading and Its development: Component skills approaches (pp. 375–422). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1964). The early growth of logic in the child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koda, K. (1989). Effects of L1 orthographic representation on L2 phonological coding strategies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 201–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koda, K. (1990). The use of L1 reading strategies in L2 reading: Effects of L1 orthographic structures on L2 phonological recording strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 393–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montrul, S. (2004). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morpho-syntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montrul, S. (2006). Incomplete acquisition as a feature of bilingual and L2 grammars. In R. Slabakova, S. Montrul, & P. Prévost (Eds.), Inquiries in language development—Studies in honor of Lydia White (pp. 335–359). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, N., & Hulk, A. (2001). Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, L. (Ed.) (2011). Second language acquisition—Critical concepts in linguistics (Vol. III). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradis, J., & Navarro, S. (2003). Subject realization and crosslinguistic interference in the bilingual acquisition of Spanish and English: What is the role of the input? Journal of Child Language Acquisition, 30(2), 371–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, K., Liversedge, S. P., Rowland, C., & Filik, R. (2003). Children’s comprehension of sentences with focus particles. Cognition, 89, 263–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, K., Liversedge, S. P., White, D., Filik, R., & Jaz, K. (2006). Children’s interpretation of ambiguous focus in sentences with ‘only’. Language Acquisition, 13(3), 253–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philip, W. (1995). Event Quantification in the acquisition of universal quantification (Doctoral). University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platzack, C. (2001). The Vulnerable C-domain. Brain and Language, 77, 364–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., & Paoli, S. (2004). Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Subjects and objects in English-Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(3), 183–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slabakova, R. (2012). L2 semantics. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge encyclopedia of second language acquisition (pp. 127–146). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, O. J. L., & Wang, W. S.-Y. (1983). The first two R’s: The way different languages reduce speech to script affects how visual information is processed in the brain. American Scientist, 71, 238–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, E. (2006). L2 end state grammars and incomplete acquisition of Spanish CLLD constructions. In R. Slabakova, S. Montrul, & P. Prevost (Eds.), Inquiries in linguistic development: In honor of Lydia white (pp. 283–304). Amsterdam: Johns Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapata, G., Sánchez, L., & Toribio, A. J. (2005). Contact and contracting Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism, 9(3–4), 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weifeng Han .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Han, W. (2020). Syntax-Semantics Interface and the Form-Meaning Mismatch Between L1 and L2. In: Universal Grammar and the Initial State of Second Language Learning. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2452-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2452-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2451-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2452-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics