Abstract
This research paper serves as an extended research of our previous research study in another conference ISET 2016 and the paper title is called “The Impact of Social Mobile Application on Students’ Learning Interest and Academic Performance in Hong Kong’s Higher Education” (Ng, Luk, Luk & Wang, 2016). Using social mobile application for communication is common in this generation and development is driving innovation. Social mobile applications take many social forms depending on a particular application. In addition to Facebook and WhatsApp, WeChat is one of the most popular social mobile applications nowadays especially in China and Hong Kong. WeChat is a mobile text and voice messaging communication service developed by Tencent in China, which was released in 2011. It can exchange contacts with people nearby via Bluetooth, as well as providing various features for contacting people at random if desired, next to integration with social networking services such as those run by Facebook. Photographs may also be embellished with filters and captions, and a machine translation service is available. It is now very common in both China and Hong Kong. This study is to investigate the acceptance of using social mobile application, i.e., WeChat by using the UTAUT model to investigate their behavioral intention and use behavior of WeChat for their learning, as WeChat is the only available social mobile application in China and there are a significant proportion of Chinese students in Hong Kong higher education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 1–33.
Alexander, B. (2004). Going nomadic: Mobile learning in higher education. Educause Review, 39(5), 28–35.
Ally, M. (2005). Using learning theories to design instruction for mobile learning devices. In Mobile learning anytime everywhere (pp. 5–8). London, UK: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
Attewell, J., & Savill-Smith, C. (2005). Mobile learning anytime everywhere. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
Banks, K. (2008). Mobile learning in developing countries: Present realities and future possibilities. In S. Hirtz & D. M. Harper (Eds.), Education for a digital world: Active, guidelines, and effective practice from around the globe (pp. 51–56). Vancouver, Canada: Commonwealth of Learning.
Castells, M. (2001). The internet galaxy: Reflections on the internet, business, and society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Cheung, S. L. (2008). Using mobile phone messaging as a response medium in classroom experiments. Journal of Economic Education, 39, 51–67.
Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & de Zuniga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the web? The interaction of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 247–253.
Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technoloogy. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340.
De Gournay, C. (2002). Pretense of intimacy in France. In Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 193–205). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
El-Hussein, M. O. M., & Cronje, J. C. (2010). Defining mobile learning in the higher education landscape. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 12–21.
Ferriter, W. M. (2010). Cell phones as teaching tools. Educational Leadership, 68(2), 85–86.
Gao, F., & Zhang, Y. (2013). Analysis of WeChat on iPhone. In 2nd international symposium on comupter, communication, control, and automation (pp. 278–281).
Gergen, K. (2002). The challenge of absence presence. In Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 227–241). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gergen, K. (2003). Self and community in the floating worlds. In Mobile democracy: Essays on society, self and politics (pp. 103–114). Vienna, Austria: Passagen Verlag.
Heiberger, G. & Harper, R. (2008). Have you Facebooked Astin lately? Using technology to increase student involvement. In Using emerging technologies to enhance student engagement (pp. 19–35). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. New Directions for Student Services Issue#124.
Huang, Y.-M., Huang, T.-C., & Hsieh, M.-Y. (2008). Using annotation services in a ubiquitous jigsaw cooperative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 3–15.
Jarvela, S., Naykki, P., Laru, J., & Luokkanen, T. (2007). Structuring and regulating collaborative learning in higher education. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 47–59.
Johnsen, T. E. (2003). The social context of the mobile phone use of Norwegian teens. In Machines that become us: The social context of communication technology (pp. 161–170). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Katz, J. E., & Aakhus, M. A. (Eds.). (2002). Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Katz, J. E. (2005). Mobile phones in educational settings. In A sense of place: The global and the local in mobile communication (pp. 305–317). Vienna, Austria: Passagen Verlag.
Kubey, R. W., Lavin, M. J., & Barrows, J. R. (2001). Internet us enad collegiate academic performance decrements: Early findings. Journal of Communication, 51(2), 366–382.
Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683–706.
Laouris, Y., & Eteokleous, N. (2005). We need an educational relevant definition of mobile learning. Retrieved March 10, 2016 from http://www.mlearn.org.za/CD/papers/Laouris%20&%20Eteokleous.pdf
Licoppe, C. (2003). Two modes of maintaining interpersonal relations through telephone: From the domestic to the mobile phone. In Machines that become us: The social context of communication technology (pp. 171–186). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Ling, R. S., & Yttri, B. (2002). Hyper-coordination via mobile phone in Norway. In Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 139–169). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ling, R. S. (2004). Mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society, San Francisco. CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Liu, L., Cruz, A. M., Rincon, A. R., Buttar, V., Ranson, Q., & Goertzen, D. (2014). What factors determine therapists’ acceptance of new technologies for rehabilitation—A study of using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Disability and Rehabilitation, 37(5), 447–455.
Ng, K. K., Luk, C. H., Luk, Louise, & Wang, F. L. (2015). The impact of online discussion platform on students’ academic performance. Hybrid Learning: Innovation in Educational Practices, 9167, 199–208.
Ng, K. K., Luk, C. H., & Lam, W. M., (2016, July 19–21). The impact of social mobile application on students’ learning interest and academic performance in Hong Kong’s sub-degree education. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Educational Technology 2016 (ISET).
Nistor, N., Wagner, M., Istvanffy, E., & Dragota, M. (2010). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technologu: Verifying the model from a European perspective. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 6(2–3), 185–199.
Pascopella, A. (2009). From cell phone skeptic to evangelist. District Administration, 45(10), 40–41.
Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., & Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. Internet Higher Education, 13(3), 134–140.
Schachter, R. (2009). Mobile devices in the classroom. District Administration, 45(10), 31–36.
Scomavacca, E., Huff, S., & Marshall, S. (2009). Mobile phones in the classroom: If you can’t beat them, join them. Communications of the ACM, 52(4), 142–146.
Southwick, S. L. (2002). Internet use, academic performance, and social involvement in middle school age children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY. [UMI: 3057264].
Taiwo, A. A., & Downe, A. (2013). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Jouranl of Tehoretical and Applied Information Technology, 49(1), 48–58.
Tencent (2013). Fourth quarter and annual results announcement http://www.tencent.com/en-us/content/ir/news/2014/attachments/20140319.pdf
Trinder, J. (2005). Mobile technologies and systems. In Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers. USA: Taylor & Francis.
Uden, L. (2007). Activity theory for designing mobile learning. Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 1(1), 81–102.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 425–478.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
Walker, K. (2007). Introduction: Mapping the landscape of mobile learning. In Big issue in mobile learning: A report of a new workshop by the kaleidoscope network of excellence mobile learning initiative (pp. 5–6). UK: Learning Science and Research Institution: University of Nottingham.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ng, K.K., Luk, C.H., Lam, W.M. (2017). The Acceptance of Using Social Mobile Application for Learning in Hong Kong’s Higher Education. In: Ma, W., Chan, CK., Tong, Kw., Fung, H., Fong, C. (eds) New Ecology for Education — Communication X Learning. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4346-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4346-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4345-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4346-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)