Skip to main content

On the Role of Philosophical Work in Research in Teacher Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Companion to Research in Teacher Education

Abstract

The paper begins by arguing for the importance of the contribution of philosophy to educational research in general and then goes on to illustrate the contributions it can make to teacher education research sepcifically. Section 36.2 considers philosophy ‘of’ teacher education which might be concerned with epistemological, ontological and ethical questions about teacher education. It discusses epistemological questions around the kinds of knowledge teachers need, whether these relate to their subject or theoretical knowledge and ongoing questions around the theory practice relationship. Section 36.3 explores philosophy ‘as’ teacher education research. Examples of teacher educators’ own philosophical work argue for the importance of practical grounding in experience for both philosophical and empirical enquiry into teacher education. Finally, Sect. 36.4 reflects on the role of philosophy ‘in’ inter or multidisciplinary teacher education research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bennett, T. (2013). Teacher proof: Why research in education doesn’t always mean what it claims, and what you can do about it. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, D. (2017). Philosophy in educational research: Epistemology, ethics, politics and quality. Dordrecht: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floden, R. E., & Buchmann, M. (1990). Philosophical inquiry in teacher education. In: W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education. New York: Macmillan; London: Collier Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fordham, M. (2015). Teachers and the academic disciplines. Paper presented to the annual conference of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain, March 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbronn, R., & Foreman-Peck, L. (Eds.). (2015). Philosophical perspectives on teacher education. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. (1974). Knowledge and the curriculum. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A., & Dunne, J. (2002). Alasdair MacIntyre in dialogue with Joe Dunne. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 36(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oancea, A. (2014). Teachers’ professional knowledge and state-funded teacher education: A (hi)story of critiques and silences. Oxford Review of Education, 40(4), 497–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oancea, A., & Orchard, J. (2012). The future of teacher education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 46(4), 574–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orchard, J., & Heilbronn, R. (2014). Developing ethical reflection on behaviour in the classroom http://blogs.heacademy.ac.uk/social-sciences/2014/09/22/developing-ethical-reflection-on-behaviour-in-the-classroom-2. Accessed April 9, 2015.

  • Peters, R. S., & White J. P. (1969). The philosopher’s contribution to educational research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. C. (2007). The contested nature of empirical research (and why philosophy of education offers little help). In D. Bridges & R. Smith (Eds.), Philosophy, methodology and educational research (pp. 311–332). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, C., & Gingell, J. (2006). Philosophy and educational policy: A critical introduction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Bridges .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bridges, D., Oancea, A., Orchard, J. (2017). On the Role of Philosophical Work in Research in Teacher Education. In: Peters, M., Cowie, B., Menter, I. (eds) A Companion to Research in Teacher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4075-7_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4075-7_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4073-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4075-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics