Abstract
The ideas of various approaches to legal argumentation have been discussed in the previous chapters. To conclude the discussion, this chapter indicates in which respects the ideas developed in these approaches contribute to a theory for analyzing and evaluating legal argumentation, and in which respect the theory of legal argumentation could be elaborated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
The interconnections between these theories become apparent from the fact that there are several joint publications: Aarnio, Alexy, Peczenik (1981), Alexy and Peczenik (1990) and the contributions of Aarnio, Alexy, MacCormick and Peczenik in MacCormick and Summers (1991).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Feteris, E.T. (1999). Towards a Theory of Legal Argumentation in the Context of a Critical Discussion. In: Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation. Argumentation Library, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9219-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9219-2_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5175-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9219-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive