Abstract
This paper addresses the theoretical framework on corporate social reporting. Although that corporate social reporting has been analysed from different perspectives, legitmacy theory currently is the dominating perspective. Authors employing this framework suggest that social and environmental disclosures are responses to both public pressure and increased media attention resulting from major social incidents such as the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the chemical leak in Bhopal (India). More specifically, those authors argue that the increase in social disclosures represent a strategy to alter the public’s perception about the legitimacy of the organisation. Therefore, we suggest using corporate communication as an overarching framework to study corporate social reporting in which “corporate image” and “corporate identity” are central.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, C. A., W. Hill and C. B. Roberts: 1998, ‘Corporate Social Reporting Practices in Western Europe: Legitimating Corporate Behaviour?’, British Accounting Review 30(1), 1–21.
Adler, R. W. and M. J. Milne: 1997, ‘Media Exposure, Company Size, Industry, and Social Disclosure Practice’, Paper presented at the Fifth Interdisciplinary perspectives on accounting conference, Manchester.
Aerts, W.: 1994, ‘On the Use of Accounting Logic as an Explanatory Category in Narrative Accounting Disclosures’, Accounting, Organisations, and Society 19(4/5), 337–353.
Albert, S. and D. A. Whetten: 1985, ‘Organisational Identity’, in L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organisational Behaviour, volume 7 (JAI Press, Greenwich CT).
Argenti, P. A.: 1994, Corporate Communication (Irwin, New York).
Belkaoui, A and P. G. Karpik: 1989, ‘Determinants of the Corporate Decision to Disclose Social Information’, Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal 2(1), 36–50.
Blacconiere, W. G. and D. M. Patten: 1994, ‘Environmental Disclosures, Regulatory Costs and Changes in Firm Value’, Journal of Accounting and Economics 18(3), 357–377.
Birkigt, K. and M. M. Stadler: 1986, Corporate Identity — Grundlagen, Funktionen, Fallbeispiele (Verlag Moderne Industrie, Landsberg am Lech).
Brown, N. and C. Deegan: 1998, ‘The Public Disclosure of Environmental Performance Information — A Dual Test of Media Agenda Setting Theory and Legitimacy Theory’, Accounting and Business Research 29(1), 21–41.
Carter, S. M. and J. M. Dukerich: 1998, ‘Corporate Responses to cChanges in Reputation’, Corporate Reputation Review 1(3), 250–270.
Deegan, C. and B. Gordon: 1996, ‘A Study of the Environmental Disclosure Practices of Australian Corporations’, Accounting and Business Research 26(3), 187–199.
Deegan, C. and M. Rankin: 1996, ‘Do Australian Companies Report Environmental News Objectively? An Analysis of Environmental Disclosures by Firms Prosecuted Successfully by the Environmental Protection Authority’, Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal 9(2), 50–67.
Deegan, C., M. Rankin and P. Voght: 1999, ‘Firms’ Disclosure Reactions to Major Social Incidents: Australian Evidence’, Paper presented at the 22nd European Accounting Association Congress, Bordeaux.
Dowling, G. R.: 1986, ‘Managing Your Corporate Image’, Industrial Marketing Management 15, 109–115.
Dowling, J. and J. R. Pfeffer: 1975, ‘Organisational Legitimacy: Societal Values and Organisational Behaviour’, Pacific Sociological Review 18(1), 122–136.
Duimering, P. R. and E Safayeni: 1998, ‘The Role of Language and Formal Structure in the Construction and Maintenance of Organisational Images’, International Studies of Management and Organisation 28(3), 57–85.
Dutton, J. E. and J. M. Dukerich: 1991, ‘Keeping and Eye on the Mirror: Image and Identity in Organisational Adaptation’, Academy of Management Journal 34(3), 517–554.
Dutton, J. E., J. M. Dukerich and C. V. Harquail: 1994, ‘Organisational Images and Member Identification’, Administrative Science Quarterly 39(2), 239–263.
Elkington, J.: 1997, Cannibals with Forks — The Triple Bottom-line (Capstone, Oxford).
Elsbach, K. D.: 1994, ‘Managing Organisational Legitimacy in the California Cattle Industry: The cConstruction and Effectiveness of Verbal Accounts’, Administrative Science Quarterly 39(1), 57–88.
Elsbach, K. D. and R. M. Kramer: 1996, ‘Members’ Responses to Organisational Identity Threats: Encountering and Countering the Business Week Rankings’, Administrative Science Quarterly 41(3), 442–476.
Elsbach, K. D. and R. I. Sutton: 1992, ‘Acquiring Organisational Legitimacy Through Illegitimate Actions), A Marriage of Institutional and Impression Management Theories’, Academy of Management Journal 35(4), 699–738.
Fombrun, C.: 1996, Reputation: Realising Value from the Corporate Image (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).
Giacalone, R. A.: 1988, ‘The Effect of Administrative Accounts and Gender on the Perception of Leadership’, Group and Organisation Studies 13(2), 195–207.
Gray, E. R. and J. M. T. Balmer: 1998, ‘Managing Corporate Image and Corporate Reputation’, Long Range Planning 31(5), 695–702.
Gray, R., K. J. Bebbington and D. Walters: 1993, Accounting for the Environment (Chapman, London).
Gray, R., R. Kouhy and S. Lavers: 1995, ‘Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting: A Review of the Literature and a Longitudinal Study of UK Disclosure’, Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal 8(2), 47–77.
Gray, R., D. Owen and C. Adams: 1996, Accounting and Accountability — Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting (Prentice Hall, London).
Grolin, J.: 1998, ‘Corporate Legitimacy in Risk Society: The Case of Brent Spar’, Business Strategy and the Environment 7(4), 213–222.
Guthrie, J. and L. D. Parker: 1989, ‘Corporate Social Reporting: A Rebuttal of Legitimacy Theory’, Accounting and Business Research 19(76), 343–352.
Hackston, D. and M. J. Milne: 1996, ‘Some Determinants of Social and Environmental Disclosures in New Zealand Companies’, Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal 9(1), 77–108.
Jones, E. E.: 1990, Interpersonal Perception (Freeman, New York).
Kaptein, M. and J. Wempe: 1998, ‘The Ethics Report: A Means of Sharing Responsibility’, Business Ethics: A European Review 7(3), 131–139.
Lindblom, C. K.: 1994, ‘The Implications of Organisational Legitimacy for Corporate Social Performance and Disclosure’, Paper presented at the Critical perspectives on accounting conference, New York.
Meyer, J. and B. Rowan: 1977, ‘Institutional Organisations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology 83(2), 340–363.
Meznar, M. B. and D. Nigh: 1995, ‘Buffer or Bridge? Environmental and Organisational Determinants of Public Affairs Activities in American Firms’, Academy of Management Journal 38(4), 975–996.
Morsing, M.: 1999, ‘The Media Boomerang: The Media’s Role in Changing Identity by Changing Image’, Corporate Reputation Review 2(2), 116–135.
Neale, A.: 1997, ‘Organisational Learning in Contested Environments: Lessons from Brent Spar’, Business Strategy and the Environment 6(2), 93–103.
Neu, D., H. Warsame and K. Pedwell: 1998, ‘Managing Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports’, Accounting, Organisations, and Society 23(3), 265–282.
O’Donovan, G.: 1997, ‘Legitimacy Theory and Corporate Environmental Disclosure: Some Case Study Evidence’, Paper presented at 1997 Accounting Association of Australia and New Zealand Annual Conference, Hobart.
Oegema, D., M. de Haan and B. van Leur: 1998, ‘Shell en de Publiciteit over de Brent Spar’, in V. M. G. Damoiseaux and A. A. van Ruler (eds.), Effectiviteit in Communicatiemanagement (Samson, Dventer).
Patten, D. M.: 1991, ‘Exposure, Legitimacy, and Social Disclosure’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 10(4), 297–308.
Patten, D. M.: 1992, ‘Intra-industry Environmental Disclosures in Response to the Alaskan Oil Spill: A Note on Legitimacy Theory’, Accounting, Organisations, and Society 17(5), A11–415.
Patten, D. M. and J. R. Nance: 1998, ‘Regulatory Effects in a Good News Environment: The Intra-industry Reaction to the Alaskan Oil Spill’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 17(4/5), 409–429.
Pfeffer, J. R.: 1981, ‘Management as Symbolic Action: The Creation and Maintenance of Organisational Paradigm’, in L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organisational Behaviour, volume 3 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT).
Riel, C. B. M. van: 1995, Corporate Communication (Prentice Hall, New York).
Riel, C. B. M. van and F. A. J. van den Bosch: 1997, ‘Increasing Effectiveness of Managing Strategic Issues Affecting a Firm’s Reputation’, Corporate Reputation Review 1(1/2), 135–140.
Rindova, V. P.: 1997, ‘The Image Cascade and the Formation of Corporate Reputations’, Corporate Reputation Review 1(1/2), 188–194.
Rosenfeld, P., R. A. Giacalone and C. A. Riordan: 1995, Impression Management in Organisations (Routledge, London).
Schlenker, B. R.: 1980, Impression Management: The Self-concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations (Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Montery).
Schlenker, B. R. and M. F Weigold: 1992, ‘Interpersonal Processes Involving Impression Regulation and Management’, Annual Review of Psychology 43, 133–168.
Scott, M. B. and S. M. Lyman: 1968, ‘Accounts’, American Sociological Review 33(1), 46–62.
Staw, B. M., P. I. McKechnie and S. M. Puffer: 1983, ‘The Justification of Organisational Performance’, Administrative Science Quarterly 28(4), 582–600.
Tedeschi, J. T. and M. Riess: 1981, ‘Verbal Strategies in Impression Management’, in C. Antaki (ed.), The Psychology of Everyday Explanations of Social Behaviour (Academic Press, London).
Ullmann, A. E.: 1985, ‘Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationship’s among Social Performance, Social Disclosure and Economic Performance of US Firms’, Academy of Management Review 10(3), 540–557.
VendelØ, M. T: 1998, ‘Narrating Corporate Reputation: Becoming Legitimate Through Storytelling’, International Studies of Management and Organisation 28(3), 120–137.
Waiden, W. D. and B. N. Schwartz: 1997, ‘Environmental Disclosures and Public Policy Pressure’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16(2), 125–154.
Zadek, S., P. Pruzan and P. Evans: 1997, Building Corporate Accountability—Emerging Practices in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting (Earthscan, London).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate Communication and Impression Management — New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting. In: Sójka, J., Wempe, J. (eds) Business Challenging Business Ethics: New Instruments for Coping with Diversity in International Business. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4311-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4311-0_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-6586-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4311-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive