Abstract
Since Nietzsche’s aphorism ‘The Madman,’ the question of embodiment has stood, albeit uneasily, on the philosophical horizon. If God is dead, what is the status of his murderer, the human subject? If God, the totality of codes that constitute Western metaphysics, no longer exists, must not the human subject, that complex of mind, body and desire, have died at the same time? To be sure, for Nietzsche, it is we who made the God that became the ideal of truth, goodness, and life-denying beauty. Yet it would be a hasty philosophical sleight of hand if we failed to note that we, the murderers of that ideal, are implicated in the subsequent, fundamental shift of all structures of meaning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Michel Foucault, The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences, (New York: Random House, 1970), p. 3 42; Martin Heidegger, The End of Philosophy,, trans. Joan Stambaugh (New York: Harper and Row, 1973), pp. 14, 15.
Rodolphe Gasché, ‘Ecce Homo, or the Written Body,’ Oxford Literary Review, 7 (1985), pp. 3–24.
Heidegger, Being and Time,, trans. Macquarrie and Robinson (New York: Harper and Row, 1962), p. 142; ‘Letter on Humanism,’ Heidegger: Basic Writings, trans. David Krell (New York: Harper and Row, 1977), pp. 189–242; Foucault, The Order of Things,, pp. 385–7.
Heidegger, Being and Time,, p. 142, Nietzsche,, vol. 1, The Will to Power as Art,, trans. David Krell (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1979), pp. 98, 99; Heracleitus Seminar 1966/67,, trans. Charles Seibert (University: University of Alabama, 1979), p. 146. It is interesting to note that Edmund Husserl, too, altered his initial, seemingly inexorable critique of philosophical anthropology in his later writings. See my ‘Husserl’s Philosophical Anthropology,’ Philosophy Today, 21 (1977), pp. 347–55, which was presented at the founding conference of the Collegium Phaenomenologicum, June, 1976.
Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra,, trans. Walter Kaufmann (New York: Viking Press, 1966), p. 34.
Ibibd.
Nietzsche, The Gay Science,, trans. Walter Kaufmann (New York: Vintage, 1974), p. 63.
Nietzsche, ‘On Truth and Lie in an Extra-Moral Sense,’ The Portable Nietzsche,, trans. Walter Kaufmann (New York: Viking Press, 1968), p. 45.
Nietzsche, The Will to Power,, trans. Walter Kaufmann and R.J. Hollingdale (New York: Vintage, 1968), pp. 266, 306.
Foucault, The Order of Things,, pp. 342, 385, 386.
Foucault , Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison,, trans. Alan Sheridan (New York: Vintage, 1979), p. 28.
Ibid., P. 136
Ibid., P. 137
Foucault, The Archaeology of Knowledge,, trans. Alan Sheridan Smith (New York: Harper and Row, 1972), pp. 12, 15
Foucault, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977,, ed. Colin Gordon (New York: Pantheon, 1980), p. 117.
Foucault, Power/Knowledge, p. 98.
Foucault, The History of Sexuality, vol. 1, An Introduction, trans. Robert Hurley (New York: Vintage, 1980), p. 159.
Foucault, Discipline and Punish, pp. 306, 307.
Foucault, Power/Knowledge, pp. 81, 82; Discipline and Punish, pp. 61, 67, 73.
Foucault, Power/Knowledge, pp. 81, 82.
Ibid., p. 84.
Ibid., p. 85.
Foucault, The Order of Things, p. 342. See also Power/Knowledge, p. 58.
Oxford English Dictionary: The Compact Edition, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971), p. 1348.
Nietzsche, The Gay Science, p. 181.
Maurice Merleau-Ponty, The Visible and the Invisible, trans. Alphonso Lingis (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1968), p. 250.
Merleau-Ponty , The Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Colin Smith (London: Routledge, Kegan and Paul, 1962), p. 150; Nietzsche, The Will to Power, p. 283.
Merleau-Ponty, The Phenomenology of Perception, p. 166.
Ibid., p. 137.
Merleau-Ponty, The Visible and the Invisible, pp. 139, 250.
Ibid., pp. 140, 137, 138.
Ibid., p. 143.
Ibid., p. 255.
Ibid.
Ibid., p. 263.
Ibid.
Merleau-Ponty T, ‘Eye and Mind,’ tr. Carleton Dallery, Primacy of Perception, (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1964), pp. 163, 170.
Merleau-Ponty, The Visible and the Invisible, pp. 263, 264.
Merleau-Ponty, ‘Eye and Mind,’ Primacy of Perception, p. 164.
Merleau-Ponty, The Visible and the Invisible, p. 264.
Ibid., pp. 246, 264.
Ibid., p. 264.
Ibid., p. 152.
Ibid., p. 179.
Ibid., p. 256. For another development of this theme see Through the Wild Region: An Essay of Phenomenological Feminism,’ Review of Existential Psychology and Psychiatry, special issue on Merleau-Ponty, 18 (1986), forthcoming, which was first presented at the Collegium Phaenomenologicum, July, 1979.
Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, p. 315.
Merleau-Ponty, The Visible and the Invisible, pp. 147, 148.
Roland Barthes, Image-Music-Text, trans. Stephen Heath (New York: Hill and Wang, 1977), p. 146.
Barthes , The Grain of the Voice: Interviews 1962–1980, trans. Linda Coverdale (New York: Hill and Wang, 1985), p. 242; Roland Barthes by oland Barthes, trans. Richard Howard (New York: Hill and Wang, 1977), p. 60.
Barthes, Roland Barthes by Roland Barthes, p. 180.
Michel-Antoine Burnier and Patrick Rambaud, Le Roland Barthes sans peine, (Paris: Ballard, 1978), p. 41. Barthes, The Pleasure of the Text, trans. Richard Miller (New York: Hill and Wang, 1975), p. 64; Le Grain de la voix, (Paris: Seuil, 1981), p. 184.
Barthes, The Pleasure of the Text, pp. 66, 72.
Ibid., p. 17.
Ibid., pp. 17,57.
Barthes, Roland Barthes by Roland Barthes, p. 90.
Barthes, The Pleasure of the Text, pp. 61, 62.
Ibid., Image-Music-Text, p. 145.
Barthes, The Pleasure of the Text, p. 62; The Responsibility of Forms, trans. Richard Howard (New York: Hill and Wang, 1985), p. 170.
Barthes, The Responsibility of Forms, p. 170.
Ibid.
Barthes, Image-Music-Text, p. 142.
Barthes, The Pleasure of the Text, p. 72.
Nietzsche, The Will to Power, pp. 253, 434; Barthes, The Pleasure of the Text, p. 16.
Barthes, S/Z: An Essay, trans. Richard Miller (New York: Hill and Wang, 1974), pp. 88, 215, 216.
Barthes, Roland Barthes by Roland Barthes, p. 112; The Pleasure of the Text, pp. 57, 62.
Barthes, The Pleasure of the Text, p. 39.
Ibid., p. 65.
Barthes, S/Z, p. 215.
Barthes, Roland Barthes by Roland Barthes, p. 49; The Pleasure of the Text, p. 23.
Barthes, Roland Barthes by Roland Barthes, p. 76.
Ibid., p. 49.
Barthes, The Responsibility of Forms, p. 171.
Umberto Eco, The Name of the Rose, trans. William Weaver (New York: Warner, 1983), pp. 149–53, 573–85.
Barthes, Roland Barthes by Roland Barthes, p. 84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Allen, J. (1988). The Economy of the Body in a Post-Nietzschean Era. In: Sallis, J.C., Moneta, G., Taminiaux, J. (eds) The Collegium Phaenomenologicum, The First Ten Years. Phaenomenologica, vol 105. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2805-3_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2805-3_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7762-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2805-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive